search for: philosopher

Hello, I created a Google Group http://groups.google.com/group/web-framework-architecture for discussing platform independent web-framework (or web-server) architectures. Everyone can agree that Rail''s style MVC design is not the end-all web development platform but merely a leap forward in our ideas of how to best work with HTT protocol. With tools like Ruby, Mongrel, and Rack, sitting

Hi, How about creating another mailing list to let people vent themselves? It would make it easier for everyone, since technical/troubleshooting issues and opinions target different people. This messages is a test as well. I couldn't write to the list through gmane so I corrected the address with gmane admin. Hope this works. Regards,

>> >> * I don't want to trade my time implementing stuff users will see (linker script, debug index, speed) for things users will not. > > > Don't you think that you are somehow trading your time for other people's time when they'll have to build other features on top of the codebase? > I understand you're putting the cursor toward end-users facing

Dear Sirs and madams :-) I am trying to teach myself multidimensional scaling. To that effect I have collected a survey asking people to rank 10 philosophers and politicians according to their preference. I have collected 61 answers. The data is organized in ten columns and 61 rows. the columns are "choice_1", "choice_2", "choice_3" etc. The cells is the name of the philosopher I guess I need to put the data in some other...

Im trying to run this program called Thinkboxx and wen it tryes to comunicate over the comm port it hangs. Here are som output to read. earlier on i get: Call kernel32.VirtualAlloc(43050000,00001000,00001000,00000004) ret=0058557c Ret kernel32.VirtualAlloc() retval=43050000 ret=0058557c thats from vhere the com port gets an virtual memory space, i think. and in the end i have: Call

Hi Russell, > br i32 1, label %1, label %6 if you build LLVM with checking enabled, then you would not have been able to create this bogus branch instruction: the BranchInst constructors assert if the condition does not have type i1. This does raise a philosophical question though: should the verifier try to catch mistakes that constructors would catch if assertions are turned on? Ciao,

> The former co-author contributed, so he is still author and probably copyright > holder and has to be listed among the authors, otherwise it would be a CRAN > policy violation ... It's a bit of a philosophical question right now, but at some point in a developing package's life - particularly one that starts small but is subsequently refactored in growth - there may be no code

We have been requested to insert the following email address, "samba@samba.org", in the Verba Volant Newsletter database. Through this daily service you will receive a quotation, selected from amongst the most celebrated philosophers, writers and poets of all time and translated into many languages and dialects by volunteers worldwide. If you would like to confirm your subscription to Verba Volant, please click on the following link: http://www.logos.net/owa-l/press.subscribe?lang=en&email=samba@samba.org If you do not w...

Hey everyone, I have a philosophical question here. Say I have a website that uses two models for accounts: Person and Company. Normally I would just have /accounts/new for user signup. However, the RESTful way to do it is to have /people and /companies. Unfortunately, this doesn''t account for a situation where you''d have a one-page signup form. I wouldn''t want

Hi, I'm developing a package whose API is only meant to be used in other packages via imports or pkg::foo(). There should be no need to attach this package so that its API appears on the search() path. As a maintainer, I want to avoid having it appear in search() conflicts by mistake. This means that, for instance, other packages should declare this package under 'Imports' or

Hi guys. Quite happy with mocha for testing. It''s been a bit of an eye opener for me, and I expect to begin using it heavily. One other thing I''d like to do is stub out particular class methods in development. Is there a way I can do this with mocha? Jason

Hi, I'm aware that the language definition states "R objects are often coerced to different types during computations". Two questions: 1. Is it possible to configure the R environment so that, for example, coercion from (say) numeric to integer will throw a warning or an error? I realize that in the base R code alone, there are thousands of calls to as.integer() which would

I was testing my implementation of the usual ternary function just now, and it's giving the wrong answer; I would attribute this to an error in my parser/abstract syntax tree code, but looking at the output, as far as I can see, the intermediate code is correct at the point where I hand it to LLVM's JIT. Could someone look and see if I'm doing something wrong, misunderstanding the

Hi Reid, > Instructions are members of a linked list. Consequently if you insert > some Instruction, that instruction gets changed. So, its not const. > > Simple enough? Yes, thank you. I started thinking if "mutable" is right here, but that's long philosophical issue ;-) - Volodya

Will Simon Wilkinson's GSSAPI Key Exchange patch ever be incorporated into the OpenSSH source? http://www.sxw.org.uk/computing/patches/openssh.html I'm sure I'm not the only one that uses it and would like to see it become part of the OpenSSH source. Is there something missing or is there some technical/philosophical reason for not including it?

First of all, I apologize for asking a question that has appeared recurrently in this mailing list. However, I have googled for it, have looked at the mailing list archives, and also looked at Pinheiro & Bates book (although not very thoroughly, I must confess), to no avail. Here is the question: I am trying to obtain with lme or lmer the same exact numerical results (p-values) that I obtain

Hi, I have a strange one for the group. We have a system that predicts probabilities using a fairly standard svm (e1017). We are looking at probabilities of a binary outcome. The input data is generated by a perl script that calculates a bunch of things, fetches data from a database, etc. We train the system on 30,000 examples and then test the system on an unseen set of 5,000 records.

Dear all, Consider a completely randomized block design (let's use data(Oats) irrespoctive of the split-plot design it was arranged in). Look: library(nlme) fit <- lme(yield ~ nitro, Oats, random = ~1|Block, method="ML") fit2 <- lm(yield ~ nitro + Block, Oats) anova(fit, fit2) gives this: Model df AIC BIC logLik Test L.Ratio p-value fit 1 4 624.3245

a specification will _eventually_ be used, by someone, to tell the user they are doing things "wrong", won't it? and doesn't that turn markdown's genesis upside-down? heck, next thing you know we'll be telling them to r.t.f.m. i would prefer that implementers get more sophisticated about teasing out the user's intent in "ambiguous" cases. of course,

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Rafael Espíndola via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Mehdi Amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>, "Bruce Hoult" <bruce at hoult.org> > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 8:24:16 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Need help with code