Displaying 14 results from an estimated 14 matches for "peterjeremi".
Did you mean:
peterjeremy
2004 Nov 09
2
Firewall rules that discriminate by connection duration
I'm interested in crafting firewall rules that throttle connections
that have lasted more than a certain amount of time. (Most such
connections are P2P traffic, which should be given a lower priority
than other connections and may constitute network abuse.) Alas, it
doesn't appear that FreeBSD's IPFW can keep tabs on how long a
connection has been established. Is there another firewall
2004 Sep 19
2
sshd security
I had the same problem so i setup up hosts.allow to only allow access
from certain ips i require
This has the affect of killing the connection from any other ip befor
gettign to any login prompt
example below
sshd : localhost : allow
sshd : 192.168.2. : allow
sshd : 82.41.115.213 :allow
sshd : 216.123.248.219 : allow <-- public ip i wish to allow of course
i have changed it
sshd : all :
2008 Sep 02
2
Is it safe to delete /bin/[ && /usr/bin/false?
Greetings,
Well, I en devoured to install a copy of 7 as an effort to upgrade
one of our servers. After installing a few ports, I began to notice:
[: -le: argument expected messages being emitted during the configure/make
process. I've already invested a fair amount of time on this upgrade,
and /really/ don't want to wipe the disk(s) and start all over. This
issue is not new to me - see
2003 Jul 26
5
suid bit files + securing FreeBSD
Hello everybody,
I'm a newbie in this list, so I don't know if it's the appropriate place
for my question. Anyway, I'd be happy to find out the solution.
Please, has anyone simple answer for:
I'm looking for an exact list of files, which:
1. MUST have...
2. HAVE FROM BSD INSTALLATION...
3. DO NOT NEED...
4. NEVER MAY...
...the suid-bit set.
Of course, it's no problem to
2005 Oct 11
10
FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-05:21.openssl
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
=============================================================================
FreeBSD-SA-05:21.openssl Security Advisory
The FreeBSD Project
Topic: Potential SSL 2.0 rollback
Category: contrib
Module: openssl
Announced: 2005-10-11
2005 Nov 26
7
Reflections on Trusting Trust
or "How do I know my copy of FreeBSD is the same as yours?"
I have recently been meditating on the issue of validating X.509
root certificates. An obvious extension to that is validating
FreeBSD itself.
Under "The Cutting Edge", the handbook lists 3 methods of
synchronising your personal copy of FreeBSD with the Project's copy:
Anonymous CVS, CTM and CVSup. There are
2008 Aug 22
3
sun4v arch
I would also like to help as well.
As KMacy knows before i asked a lot of questions for T2 types of
servers but unfortunately i have no more access to those kind of
hardware as well.
I;m willing to participate if a team will be formated.
2008 Feb 28
14
Upgrading to 7.0 - stupid requirements
In http://www.freebsd.org/releases/7.0R/announce.html says
Updating Existing Systems
> An upgrade of any existing system to FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE constitutes
> a major version upgrade, so no matter which method you use to update
> an older system you should reinstall any ports you have installed on
> the machine. This will avoid binaries becoming linked to inconsistent
> sets
2006 May 22
12
FreeBSD Security Survey
Dear FreeBSD users and system administrators,
While the FreeBSD Security Team has traditionally been very good at
investigating and responding to security issues in FreeBSD, this only
solves half of the security problem: Unless users and administrators
of FreeBSD systems apply the security patches provided, the advisories
issued accomplish little beyond alerting potential attackers to the
2009 Feb 18
0
Pendrive 8G+CAM_REQ_CMP_ERR
[Moved to -stable as this is not relevant to -fs]
On 2009-Feb-14 10:30:45 -0200, Sylvio C?sar Teixeira Amorim <scjamorim@bsd.com.br> wrote:
>3 Pendrive, 2 are 1, 1G and 8G, I'm using FreeBSD-7.1-stable, the problem is
>when you connect to 8G, the fbsd detects the device, da0, etc, but not
>create the / dev/da0 takes us about 10min trying to create this device, only
>appears
2003 Sep 05
1
ACPI utilities
I have an Athlon system which isn't co-operating with the ACPI in
-stable (I haven't tried -current yet). I notice that the general
recommendation in -current is to provide the output of acpidump but
none of the ACPI userland has been MFC'd.
I just had a quick try and building the -current userland on -stable
and found this is non-trivial because it appears that the APIs are
2003 Apr 08
0
Panic dereferencing p->p_leader during exit1()
My wife got the following from a system running (effectively)
4.8-RELEASE (I built/installed world just before the kernel version
was updated from 4.8-RC to 4.8-RELEASE). I gather she made a few
attempts to get mozilla to start and then the system panic'd.
According to the crashdump, p->p_leader is NULL but according to
the code, this can never happen. This is a UP Athlon XP-1800
with
2008 Jun 03
2
Interrupt storm with shared interrupt on digi(4)
I have an on-going problem with DigiBoard Xem boards causing interrupt
storms (since 4.x days). The FreeBSD driver polls the board and
doesn't have a functional interrupt handler (and Linux behaves in the
same way). It seems that under some conditions, the board will assert
its interrupt line and, since there's no interrupt handler to clear
whatever triggered the interrupt, the IRQ is
2003 Sep 03
0
System hanging in acpi during shutdown
This morning, I upgraded my main system to an up-to-date -STABLE
including acpi and it now hangs during shutdown after reporting:
Waiting (max 60 seconds) for system process `vnlru' to stop...stopped
If I set hw.acpi.disable_on_poweroff=0 then the shutdown completes but
poweroff fails with (hand copied):
ACPI-1287: ***Error: Method execution failed [\_PTS] (Node 0xc21ed450),