search for: pestered

Hello there! It's been a while since RC2 was released and I have been waiting patiently for the next version. I was wondering what improvements have been made to the code for the next version. Can I expect more speed, better quality etc? Also, is the CVS tree the development source, or is there a lot of interesting stuff on closed branches like it was for beta 4? I know I'm pestering,

On Wed, 28 Sep 2016 10:09:28 -0300 Gilberto Nunes via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Thanks.... I hope this is my last post with this matter! I hope it's your last post on any matter. You quit Samba very noisily. If you don't remember doing so, just look at the subject line. Don't look back. Go to your beloved Windows CIFS. You've found somebody better:

I remember a discussion to the effect that using DSA keys in sshd increases the requirement for random bits available on the system... and that this requirement (was it a 128 bit random number per connection?) presents security problems on systems that don't have a decent source of entropy? Am I misinterpreting those discussions? We are having a problem deploying sshd (no prngd) where sshd

On Mar 1, 2010, at 09:56, james woodyatt wrote: > On Mar 1, 2010, at 04:43, Duncan Sands wrote: >> >> Where exactly? I don't see it in the online version. > > See <http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#t_function> and look at the second example: > > float (i16 signext, i32 *) * > > Pointer to a function that takes an i16 that should be sign extended

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 9:28 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:45 PM, John Criswell <jtcriswel at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Dear All, >> >> Some community members have contacted me directly regarding recent >> outages of the LLVM services. While I'm no longer a University of Illinois

Add a way to disable the timer IRQ routing check via a boot option. The VMI timer code uses this to avoid triggering the pester Mingo code, which probes for some very unusual and broken motherboard routings. It fires 100% of the time when using a paravirtual delay mechanism instead of using a realtime delay, since there is no elapsed real time, and the 4 timer IRQs have not yet been delivered.

Add a way to disable the timer IRQ routing check via a boot option. The VMI timer code uses this to avoid triggering the pester Mingo code, which probes for some very unusual and broken motherboard routings. It fires 100% of the time when using a paravirtual delay mechanism instead of using a realtime delay, since there is no elapsed real time, and the 4 timer IRQs have not yet been delivered.

On Mar 1, 2010, at 20:28, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:20 PM, james woodyatt <jhw at conjury.org> wrote: >> I'm sorry to pester about this, but I was really hoping somebody could straighten me out about this. The Language Reference really does seem to be ambiguous about this, and I'm willing to compose a patch to fix it, but I need to know what the

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:09 AM, SF Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: >> FWIW, he already gained a place on my ignore list for pestering me >> offline about his patches and not stopping even when told to do so. > > How did I "pester" you "offline"? > > >> So while I won't object if you choose to apply selected

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:09 AM, SF Markus Elfring <elfring at users.sourceforge.net> wrote: >> FWIW, he already gained a place on my ignore list for pestering me >> offline about his patches and not stopping even when told to do so. > > How did I "pester" you "offline"? > > >> So while I won't object if you choose to apply selected

I'm trying to figure out a way, or if it is even possible, to use mailing list software (majordomo2) on a Postfix + Dovecot + virtual mailboxes system. And where I should be looking. The examples on the Postfix site don't seem to address a purely virtual mailboxes system and I haven't found anything about doing it with deliver. I think I'm at the wrong tree (Dovecot deliver)

Hi all Is the EventMachine website (www.rubyeventmachine.com) down? I can''t access it from South Africa, and have tried using tor as well with no luck. I''m kinda new to EventMachine, so I first have a lot of examples to work through and reading to do before I start pestering the mailing list with questions. Thanks to everyone who partook in creating the library, so far

On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 8:20 PM, james woodyatt <jhw at conjury.org> wrote: > On Mar 1, 2010, at 09:56, james woodyatt wrote: >> On Mar 1, 2010, at 04:43, Duncan Sands wrote: >>> >>> Where exactly?  I don't see it in the online version. >> >> See <http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#t_function> and look at the second example: >> >>  

Perhaps this could work: 2016-09-28 17:18 GMT-03:00 Gaiseric Vandal via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> : > I think there was a web app called SWAT. The problem I have with the > samba web app or gui config tools (I think redhat had one) is that they > might delete any fine tuning you set in smb.conf. > > > > > > > > > On 09/28/16 16:01, Steve Litt

To all or anyone: I have a very strange problem when using syslinux, and lnx-bbc. Perhaps somebody can provide some insight into Syslinux as it relates to what I'm trying to do. At Peerless, we use LNX-BBC to build a bootable USB thumbdrive. We added a script to init.d in the ram disk to execute one our scripts during LNX-BBC boot from the USB thumb drive. I have seen an apparent

I haven''t seen any mention of it in this forum yet, so FWIW you might be interested in the details of ZFS deduplication mentioned in this recently-filed case. Case log: http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2009/571/ Discussion: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=115507 Very nice -- I like the interaction with "copies", and (like a few others) I think

Hear ye! Hear ye! This is a call for testers for the 3.3 release!!! What's Expected --------------- You might be asking yourself, "Self, I would like to be an LLVM tester for the 3.3 release, but I don't know what's involved in being one." Well, ask yourself no more! Not only do I have the answers for you, but talking to yourself will cause people to avoid you. Here's

Dear all I have FAX machine connected with audiocode SIP device i am trying to send fax and when negosiation going on and i start send fax button then my after half page it got stuck in fax machine so is there any codec problem i am useing ulaw/alaw is it fine or not anybody have idea about sending fax with SIP connected device --------------------------------- Ready

On Mar 1, 2010, at 04:43, Duncan Sands wrote: > [I wrote:] >> >> Nevertheless, the LLVM Language Reference document suggests, in the examples for the Function Types section, that parameter attributes are part of function types. > > Where exactly? I don't see it in the online version. See <http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#t_function> and look at the second

Hello all: I am very much enjoying reading this list. It's great to see discussion (mostly readable by non-vorbis-developer types) on the potential of vorbis and OGG in general. But I'd like to ask about the immediate future. I am very keen to adopt OGG vorbis for a number of uses, but I am awaiting a few things. And I do not wish to pester and hassle those hard at work to make this