search for: personalis

If the clients login locally and not in a domain. Then tell you users to use .\loginname Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: Alberto Maria Fiaschi [mailto:alberto.fiaschi at estar.toscana.it] > Verzonden: vrijdag 11 januari 2019 10:16 > Aan: L.P.H. van Belle > CC: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] upgrade to 4.8.3 authentication not

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland Penny via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 18 januari 2019 11:00 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Winbind, cached logons and 'user > persistency'... > > On Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:41:10 +0100 > "L.P.H. van Belle via samba"

I updated a centos 7 without changing the samba configuration. Before authentication worked even without having to specify the domain to the logon. After the update, on the other hand, it is mandatory to specify the domain. user password: not work. domain \ user password work. I have 5000 windows (xp / 7/10) clients not in domain. Client workgroups are varied. Users are not expert at all and

How about setting: map untrusted to domain = yes The default changed here. But it would still help if we could see the smb.conf as the big difference with 4.8 is that winbind needs to run now. This might also do something like this. Regards Christian Am 11.01.19 um 10:46 schrieb L.P.H. van Belle via samba: > I gave you the most simple option. > > And the difference is. >

Hi dag! Thx for your reply! So, there will be no release in the near future of centos 5 for Z? At the moment we got a realy small z/linux installation, but i love it. Keeping the TCO as low as we can was necessary to satisfy the decision-maker. So we decided to choos a free linux distribution, centos was a good decicion we thougt. (redhat / fedora was always my favorite flavor *g*) It would

put map untrusted to domain = yes in smb.conf and strarted winbind. Now work !!!  nice -n '-20'  yes 'thanks a lot' Buda Il 11/01/19 10:56, Christian Naumer via samba ha scritto: > How about setting: > > map untrusted to domain = yes > > The default changed here. But it would still help if we could see the > smb.conf as the big difference with 4.8 is that

Hai, small note here.. > > Setting up the Admin user is interesting. I will try that. > But I could as well add myself to the domain admins group. > The name is arbitrary. Yes the name is but now you are working with Admin rights. Never ever do that. Please dont, use the UAC. It's so easy to get infected if you work as admin so dont.. Personaly here, at the office, i

Hi, according to discussion on asterisk IRC, where people said, that macros will be depracated, I tried to migrate from macros to contexts and Gosub but if I try to use gosub in extensions.ael, ael compiler complains, that I shouln't use Gosub app, but I can't find ael keyword, that will be Gosub equivalent, or can I ignore this ael warnings? thanks PJ LOG: lev:3 file:pval.c

I gave you the most simple option. And the difference is. myserverdomain\username works only on that server. (myserverdomain) .\username works on any server where the loginname and password are the same. There is NO other option for you that i know off. (sorry) Yes.. the other option is, setup an AD domain. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba

When I created the User Documentation page "Configure Samba to Work Better with Mac OS X?, my intent was to help others in the same situation I am: I have a WD MyCloud (Gen1) running an old version of samba (4.3.11) with no expectation that the firmware would be upgraded for the latest & greatest samba. The device is still usable, but was not optimized for Macs, so I ssh?d into the

Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba In chel di` si favelave... > For the upgrade path. > Read: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Updating_Samba > And this text file shows some good debian specific info > http://downloads.van-belle.nl/samba4/Upgrade-info.txt > Some parts are already fixed, but its mainly making sure the smb.conf is correct for the version your upgradeing to.

Hello, Digium uses the Dell PE 2850 for their testing. This site says that 3.3V PCI slot. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+hardware We are planning on purchasing a Dell PE 2850 and putting a TE205P card on it. However, the needs a 5V PCI slot. Does Dell PE 2850 has a 5V PCI slot? A person in our group tried to call Dell's customer support but they do not seem to know.

Hello, I've found this information about asterisk and LDAP: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Asterisk+LDAP which can be out of date. I'm trying this http://www.mezzo.net/asterisk/app_ldap.html however I'm facing the same problems as this unanswered: http://forums.digium.com/viewtopic.php?p=42591&sid=05e1d00ab6f9848f4e7b6 39d66cc6d79 Does anybody know how to solve this

Of course we all know these groups would certainly not appreciate the audible distrobution of their bread and butter. However, I assume your scope is only within the U.S. , whereas personaly in Canada. Our laws governed a right to freedom of information in regards to online content. More or less, if you find it online it must be public content (unless that's been changed by now, I haven't

I'm having a weird situation with a freshly installed Samba v4.12.1 compiled from source. This is a single server with DC and fileserver, I followed all the guidelines for doing things correctly in this specific situation and I hope I haven't missed anything. The server works correctly as expected, I'm managing all the permissions from Windows. Unfortunately users occasionally

With some slight delay, we did actually manage to get all our old wonky compatibility solutions nuked (turned out there were a few more lurking in the shadows than expected?). Mail servers are no longer domain joined, and unencrypted LDAP is finally gone, together with the terrible PHP scripts that needed it. Which allowed me to finally cleanup all the samba setups:

Hello you all, we are in the process of upgrading to windows 10 on all our workstations. We see one problem with redirected folders. We redirect Appdata to a network share. [profdata] comment = Profile Data Share path = /srv/profdata csc policy = disable hide files = /?esktop.ini/ntuser.ini/NTUSER.*/?humbs.db/$RECYCLE.BIN/ This worked great (although slow) with

Dear, I've installed the following R version on HP compaq 6710 b under Fedora 8: > version _ platform i386-redhat-linux-gnu arch i386 os linux-gnu system i386, linux-gnu status major 2 minor 6.2 year 2008 month 02 day 08 svn rev 44383 language R version.string R version 2.6.2 (2008-02-08) When I try to install some R packages I receive the following message: [root at localhost

> You missed that using a DC as a fileserver isn't recommended. It was between the lines of "I followed all the guidelines for doing things correctly in this specific situation" :) > From reading the samba log, it looks like Samba logons are not working, > but ldap connections are. This means Win clients are logging in via LDAP? Can this be related to the inaccessible

Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> writes: > Well, Dirk has said to have given his last reply on this thread. > I (as a member of R-core) am glad about people like Dirk who > take some of our load and helpfully answer such > questions/reports on R-devel. I am glad too. Thank you. My ultimate goal is to ensure that R works as well on FreeBSD as it does elsewhere.