search for: perriers

I think that there are no qdiscs that permit to drop the oldest frame of a queue when this queue is full, but I would like to be wrong: bfifo drops arriving frames when the max queue length is reached. red also drops arriving frames in a more elaborate fashion, with a drop probability that increases above a limit and becomes a drop certitude when the max queue length is reached. sfq drops

I''d like to implement something like SFQ, but with a cap of a rate per flow. Essentially, I''d like to be able to limit citrix connections to 30KBps without having an overall traffic flow cap for all citrix connections. Slightly preferable to this would be something that would actually work per flow instead of the stochastic algorithm. Is this possible? Thanks, Bill --

Hello list, I''m currently a bit planless so perhaps someone here could give me a point in the right direction. History: I wrote a shaper web tool (http://shaper.netshadow.at) and now got several feature requests if it would be possible to graph "what''s going on" (this mean per IP address, tcp/udp ports or protocols) in a specific chain. A chain represents a specific

After several months of testing in the "experimental" branch of Debian, samba 3.2.0 was uploaded to Debian "unstable" as of July 20th 2008 and entered the "testing" branch of the distribution as of August 1st. As the "testing" branch is the future stable release of the Debian distribution, this means that Samba 3.2.0 will be in the upcoming release of

Hello, The qdisc spy has evolved, the new version can spy on udp and tcp connections, the results are displayed upon command. There is no gui for this tool yet, but I will try to make one. If you want to try: http://rawsoft.org Vincent Perrier

HTB versus HFSC, both qdisc offer the same kind of service, if you want to see comparative test results, go to http://www.rawsoft.org at the line "TEST RESULTS" you will find the results for a sharing test and a burst test. You will see that both qdisc are good. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

Hello, I am interrested in the monitoring of the qos qdiscs parameters such as size of the queue, enqueues, dequeues, delay in queue, I made a tool to have those results availlable at http://rawsoft.org, but it will probably not work anymore because of the kernel evolutions (the file sch_red.c is patched for the tool to work). I would like to have all the necessary data coming from the kernel

The day after Karolin announced the release of 3.2.0-pre3, the Debian packaging team was able to upload .deb packages for it in Debian *experimental*. To use them, you need to already use Debian testing or unstable, then add this to /etc/apt/sources.list: deb http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian experimental main contrib non-free (replace "fr" by your favorite mirror country code) If you

About two months ago our sysadmin upgraded to samba 2.2.7 and we have not had any oplock problems since. A heartfelt thanks from the University of Wisconsin in Madison to the Samba team for all their hard work. If our hundreds of users understood what was going on behind the scenes, they'd be thanking you too. --- Sam Barasch Computer Systems Support Department of Biostatistics

Well, things seem to be going really well with tbf, prio and sfq. But I''m a nosey bugger. :-) I''d love to be able to audit what''s going through each of the prio bands. The super ideal solution would be to be able to attach tcpdump to each band and see what''s going through it with the benefit of tcpdump''s filtering so that I can examine and filter

Hi, i visited wiki.samba.org and read the "Release Planning for Samba 3.2" information and the "Release Planning for Samba 3.3" information. So my question is: Is samba 3.2 development stopped and all concentration given to Samba 3.3 ? Because there isnt any further release note available for 3.2, but instead there are some notes for 3.3 ? Bye and thanks for your

Pam_SMB allows Linux clients to validate their passwords against an NT PDC, so the only thing you have to do is set up the accounts on the Linux side with an '*' in the /etc/passwd entry. This can be done using a list of users: #!/bin/bash for i in `cat myuserlist`; do /usr/sbin/adduser -p '*' $i with various other command line options, such as "-s

samba@samba.org "Chris" <chrisv@satl.com> "Chris" <chrisv@satl.com> thomas.heiligenmann@t-online.de (Thomas Heiligenmann) thomas.heiligenmann@t-online.de (Thomas Heiligenmann) Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com> Jeremy Allison <jeremy@valinux.com> David Collier-Brown - Sun Canada <davecb@scot.canada.sun.com> Subba Rao

(please note that this mail is crossposted to 3 lists. No need to CC me to answers, I read the 3 of them...) Some users (including me with my professionnal hat) want to use 3.5 versions of samba on production servers running Debian. Of course, most of the time, these production servers are running Debian lenny (the stable version of the distribution). Debian lenny ships with samba 3.2.5, so

Folks, We're experiencing intermittent problems with Microsoft Word 2000 under Microsoft Windows XP Professional. Here's one of the more common error messages we get when trying to save: Microsoft Word for Windows has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience. Other errors include files being opened read-only without apparent cause. These

> Can anyone confirm a bug here or offer any suggestions as to where to go > next? Well, if this is reproducible safely and downgrading to samba 3.0.24 removes the bug, I'd suggest reporting this in the Debian BTS, along with your smb.conf file, as many details as possible about your setup and the level 10 log file you mentioned. We'll investigate this and, if necessary, pass it

-----Original message----- From: Jeremy Allison jra at samba.org Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:09:31 -0600 To: dale at briannassaladdressing.com Subject: Re: [Samba] ads_sasl_spnego_krb5_bind failed: Program lackssupportfor encryption type [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 01:35:12PM -0600, dale at briannassaladdressing.com wrote: > > Alex, > > > > I've been a

I have recurrent issue with ACLs on a server that's running samba 3.2.15 (this is a Debian lenny server and we're not ready, yet, to upgrade it...we just upgraded samba from 3.2.5 to 3.2.15+security fixes). If a "foo" directory, owned by "joe", has "joe and "jim" authorized to write to it through the filesystem's ACLs (and both in "foo"

I'm currently building a Samba3-based domain (DomA) that has a trust relationship with an existing production NT4 domain (DomB). DomA uses an LDAP backend. The LDAP server is local on the PDC and is dedicated to such use. DomA runs Samba 3.5.6 on Debian 6.0. DomB is an old-timer: NT4 domain that's running for ages. The trust relationship has been established: DomA trusts DomB. Clients

apt-cache policy samba cups cups: Install? : 1.4.4-7 Candidat : 1.4.4-7 Table de version : *** 1.4.4-7 0 500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/ squeeze/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status samba: Install? : 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze5 Candidat : 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze5 Table de version : *** 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze5 0 500 http://security.debian.org/