search for: perms

...include/linux/moduleparam.h [] > @@ -188,6 +188,9 @@ struct kparam_array > /* Default value instead of permissions? */ \ > static int __param_perm_check_##name __attribute__((unused)) = \ > BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perm) < 0 || (perm) > 0777 || ((perm) & 2)) \ > + /* User perms >= group perms >= other perms. */ \ > + + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(((perm) >> 6) < (((perm) >> 3) & 7)) \ > + + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((((perm) >> 3) & 7) < ((perm) & 7)) \ > + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(sizeof(""prefix) > MAX_PARAM_PREFIX_LEN); \ &gt...

...include/linux/moduleparam.h [] > @@ -188,6 +188,9 @@ struct kparam_array > /* Default value instead of permissions? */ \ > static int __param_perm_check_##name __attribute__((unused)) = \ > BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perm) < 0 || (perm) > 0777 || ((perm) & 2)) \ > + /* User perms >= group perms >= other perms. */ \ > + + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(((perm) >> 6) < (((perm) >> 3) & 7)) \ > + + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((((perm) >> 3) & 7) < ((perm) & 7)) \ > + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(sizeof(""prefix) > MAX_PARAM_PREFIX_LEN); \ &gt...

...@@ -188,6 +188,9 @@ struct kparam_array >> > /* Default value instead of permissions? */ \ >> > static int __param_perm_check_##name __attribute__((unused)) = \ >> > BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perm) < 0 || (perm) > 0777 || ((perm) & 2)) \ >> > + /* User perms >= group perms >= other perms. */ \ >> > + + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(((perm) >> 6) < (((perm) >> 3) & 7)) \ >> > + + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((((perm) >> 3) & 7) < ((perm) & 7)) \ >> > + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(sizeof(""prefix) > M...

...@@ -188,6 +188,9 @@ struct kparam_array >> > /* Default value instead of permissions? */ \ >> > static int __param_perm_check_##name __attribute__((unused)) = \ >> > BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perm) < 0 || (perm) > 0777 || ((perm) & 2)) \ >> > + /* User perms >= group perms >= other perms. */ \ >> > + + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(((perm) >> 6) < (((perm) >> 3) & 7)) \ >> > + + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((((perm) >> 3) & 7) < ((perm) & 7)) \ >> > + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(sizeof(""prefix) > M...

...>>> > /* Default value instead of permissions? */ \ >>> > static int __param_perm_check_##name __attribute__((unused)) = \ >>> > BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perm) < 0 || (perm) > 0777 || ((perm) & 2)) \ >>> > + /* User perms >= group perms >= other perms. */ \ >>> > + + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(((perm) >> 6) < (((perm) >> 3) & 7)) \ >>> > + + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((((perm) >> 3) & 7) < ((perm) & 7)) \ >>> > + BUILD_BU...

...t; [] > > @@ -188,6 +188,9 @@ struct kparam_array > > /* Default value instead of permissions? */ \ > > static int __param_perm_check_##name __attribute__((unused)) = \ > > BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((perm) < 0 || (perm) > 0777 || ((perm) & 2)) \ > > + /* User perms >= group perms >= other perms. */ \ > > + + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(((perm) >> 6) < (((perm) >> 3) & 7)) \ > > + + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO((((perm) >> 3) & 7) < ((perm) & 7)) \ > > + BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(sizeof(""prefix) > MAX_PARAM_PRE...

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:38:40AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > +static int queue_depth = 64; > > +module_param(queue_depth, int, 444); > > 444? Really Ted? Oops, *blush*. Thanks for catching that. - Ted

On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 10:38:40AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > +static int queue_depth = 64; > > +module_param(queue_depth, int, 444); > > 444? Really Ted? Oops, *blush*. Thanks for catching that. - Ted

Hi all, Suppose we have the following matrix m <- matrix(c(1,2,3,2,1,3,3,1,2), ncol = 3, byrow=T) where in each row each number occurs only once. I'd like to define a permutation, e.g. 1 -> 2, 2 -> 1, 3 -> 3 and apply it to the matrix. Thus, the following matrix should result: m.perm <- matrix(c(2,1,3,1,2,3,3,2,1), ncol = 3, byrow=T) i.e. each 1 should map to 2 and vice

Recently we updated a Gluster replicated setup from 3.6 to 3.12 (stepping through 3.8 first before going to 3.12). Afterwards I noticed the brick logs were filling at an alarming rate on the server we have the NFS service running from: $ sudo tail -20 /var/log/glusterfs/bricks/export-gluster-shared.log [2018-05-23 06:22:12.405240] I [MSGID: 139001] [posix-acl.c:269:posix_acl_log_permit_denied]

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Hi all I noticed a pretty strange behaviour regarding file permissions that sometimes change without any reason. I need to share the following two directories: /home/public (owner=root, group=root, perms=0777) /home/users (owner=root, group=users, perms=0770) the /home directory is owned by root, the group is root and permissions are set in this way: 0755. The above dirs are shared using these instructions in smb.conf: [grp] comment = Folder for group [%g] path = /home/%g guest o...

This is a proposed patch to enhance FileSystem.h to add functionality (getting and setting permission bits and mapping an unmapping files). This implementation follows the N3365 proposal regarding permission bits. This functionality is needed for my next patch which will implement llvm/include/Support/FileOutputBuffer.h which is needed by lld. -------------- next part -------------- A

...but not the 'group' SID. It gives no errors but it just doesn't change them. A snippet of the profile in question is below: furnsrv:/data/samba/profiles/jon # profiles NTUSER.DAT |grep S-1-5 Owner SID: S-1-5-32-544 Group SID: S-1-5-21-2127521184-1604012920-1887927527-513 Perms: 000F003F, SID: S-1-5-18 Perms: 000F003F, SID: S-1-5-32-544 Perms: 10000000, SID: S-1-5-18 Perms: 10000000, SID: S-1-5-32-544 Owner SID: S-1-5-32-544 Group SID: S-1-5-21-1505131970-119759924-475665672-513 Perms: 000F003F, SID: S-1-5-18 Perms: 000F003F, SID: S-1-5-3...

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Michael Spencer <bigcheesegs at gmail.com> wrote: > >> +  error_code ec = sys::fs::status(filePathTwine, stat); > > stat is undefined if ec isn't success. ec will be success even in the case of > file_not_found. Actually I was wrong. The Windows and UNIX implementation disagree on this point. I'm going to change it to match

Maybe I'm doing somthing really stupid, but while copying some windows share onto a samba server, on some random subdirectory robocopy says ERROR 87 (0x00000057) Copying NTFS Security to Destination Directory... The samba logfile has lots of these lines. modules/vfs_posixacl.c:349(smb_acl_to_posix) smb_acl_to_posix: ACL is invalid for set (Das Argument ist ung?ltig) The strange thing is

Hi list, I tried to load the package SAGx and failed because it complains it's looking for the Biobass which is not there. Then I looked up the package list and Biobass is not found. I'm trying to run the Jonckheere-Terpstra test and from what I see in the R archive, SAGx is the only place it's been implemented. > library(SAGx) Loading required package: multtest Loading required

Couple more bikesheddy things: Is there ever a reason to use a non __builtin_const_p(perms)? Maybe that should be a BUILD_BUG_ON too BUILD_BUG_ON(!builtin_const_p_perms) My brain of little size gets confused by the BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(foo) + vs BUILD_BUG_ON(foo); as it just seems like more text for the same content. Is there any value on the "_ZERO(foo) +" I don't under...

Couple more bikesheddy things: Is there ever a reason to use a non __builtin_const_p(perms)? Maybe that should be a BUILD_BUG_ON too BUILD_BUG_ON(!builtin_const_p_perms) My brain of little size gets confused by the BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO(foo) + vs BUILD_BUG_ON(foo); as it just seems like more text for the same content. Is there any value on the "_ZERO(foo) +" I don't under...

...hashtable, they overwrite eachother to leave only unique permutations. Here's the algorithm in Java:" ----------------------------- JAVA CODE -------------------------------- import java.util.*; public class Test { public static void PermutationsRecursive(char[] s, String p, Hashtable perms){ for(int x=0; x<s.length; x++){ String np = new String(p); char[] ns = new char[s.length-1]; int y = 0; for(int z=0; z<s.length; z++){ if(z != x) ns[y++] = s[z]; } np = np + s[x]; if(ns.length == 0) perms.put(np, new Boolean(true)); else PermutationsRecursive(ns...