search for: permision

I have one share (f.e. SYS) with mamy FOXPRO aplications in different folders. I've to gave to some people permisions to write and some people permision to readonly. share: \\samba\SYS with: drwxrwx--- root aplication1 aplication1 drwxrwx--- root aplication2 aplication2 drwxrwx--- root aplication3 aplication3 I have tree groups one for each folder in share (SYS) people within this groups have r...

...g in, peruse existing content, and make new directories. But I can not create a new file from the Mac, with one exception. The Mac is able to copy a file that already exists on the share onto the share. I am unable to copy a file from the Mac to the share. The error is that I do not have sufficient permisions. I have changed the permissions from the Debian side to be wide open on a test directory, that did not work. I have tried to change the permissions from w2k on that folder, but the changes don't seem to take. Any suggestions would be appreciated. Thank you, -Michael (Please CC me directly,...

...like group to grupo1, but when a user of group2 requires and enters directorioA, the group and the user owner changes and other users of group1 or group2 lose the access to that resource. What can I do? I think create a share for each directory, but are more than 70 directories. I try to assign permisions for group, but one user belongs to 2 groups, and dosen't work too.

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Dan > Egli via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 28 oktober 2020 9:01 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] odd issue with permisions > > On 10/27/2020 1:08 PM, Dan Egli via samba wrote: > > > >> What version of Samba ? > >> > >> Please post your smb.conf > >> > >> Rowland > >> > >> > > Sorry, Samba? version 4.11.2-13 is running on CentOS? 8.? &gt...

...06 (10.10.48.6) connect to service daten initially as user root (uid=0, gid=0) (pid 13268) [2004/08/27 16:39:17, 2] smbd/posix_acls.c:set_canon_ace_list(2415) set_canon_ace_list: sys_acl_set_file type file failed for file edv (Die Operation wird nicht unterst?tzt). as you can see i should have permision to do that. any suggestions ? -- Matthias Henze matthias@mhcsoftware.de Use PGP!! http://www.mhcsoftware.de/MatthiasHenze.asc - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MHC SoftWare GmbH voice: +49-(0)9533-92006-0 Fichtera 17 fax: +49-(0)95...

Hello! In samba 3 we used create mask , force create..?? to set file permisions. In samba 4 as I understand those options are? ignored and default acls are used instead. But, is it possible to set? by default different permisions on files and folders?? For example?? on folders rwx, and on files rw-. Because I dont want to give x? permision to file as I think it can be dangero...

...e kernel that ships with RH (2.4.20-8). The patching fails on some vm file so I got a vanila kernel 2.4.20, apply the patch and compile it. This works fine. Also RH-9.0 precompiled Samba 2.2.7 works fine with ACL. I connected to my share with WinXP and do some testing with ACLs. After setting some permisions I checked in UNIX console what happens and I got: ---- # ls -ald mydir; getfacl mydir drwxrwx--- 3 PDC\my_user PDC\Domain Users 4096 Apr 8 10:05 mydir mydir # file: mydir # owner: PDC\my_user # group: PDC\Domain Users user::rwx user:PDC\test01:rwx group::--- mask::rwx other::--- default:use...

Good evening! I have installed samba 4.3.0pre1-GIT-6bbfb09 on centos 6.6 like active directory and domain controller. It turns out that, the past wednesday I lost  the administrative permissions of theadministrator and domain admins users. When I try to make a change at Remote Server Administration tool over one domain user says this: " the access rights are insufficient to carry out this

On 10/27/2020 1:08 PM, Dan Egli via samba wrote: > >> What version of Samba ? >> >> Please post your smb.conf >> >> Rowland >> >> > Sorry, Samba? version 4.11.2-13 is running on CentOS? 8.? My smb.conf is > shown below, sans comments: > > > [global] > > ??????? workgroup = EgliFamily > ??????? server string = Samba Server Version

On 10/28/2020 2:49 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 28/10/2020 08:00, Dan Egli via samba wrote: >> It's been over 24 hours and no one has even touched this. I could really >> use a bit of help. Yes, it works when I create the files/dirs in samba >> because of the masks I set, but that's just a kludge. It shouldn't >> matter that the GROUP permissions

Mandi! Dan Egli via samba In chel di` si favelave... > I posted the getfacl output a minute or two ago. I've had missed that. > Next idea? :) No one. But plain 'POSIX' access (eg, ssh) works? Eg if you try to redo the operation that does not work with samba using plain ssh access (with the same user), they works? -- dott. Marco Gaiarin GNUPG Key ID: 240A3D66

On 28/10/2020 10:24, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hm, samba 4.11.2-13 is running on CentOS? 8. > Im not really into CentOS/RH im more Debian/Ubuntu.. > > But I suggest you try this. > > Remove [homes] ( or keep it but add a new one. ) > > Setup > [users] > Path = /home > browseable = yes > read only = no > > Test again against that

ssh supports an override for StrictModes which allows a user to use group-writable .ssh directories. Is there an easy way to make openssh do this (I didn't see options in the source)? Or is this worth adding? Rafi

Well, I've received two emails asking me for more information on how I resolved this problem. I felt bad that I didn't know anything more than I had posted. Now the problem is back for me, and I am unable to resolve it again. Has anyone made any progress on this? Thanks, -Michael http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2003-November/002395.html __________________________________ Do you

On 10/28/2020 4:14 AM, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > >> Next idea? :) > No one. But plain 'POSIX' access (eg, ssh) works? Eg if you try to redo > the operation that does not work with samba using plain ssh access > (with the same user), they works? > Yes, ssh works just fine.? Here's an example of it: [dan at jupiter2 ~]$ mkdir test3 [dan at jupiter2 ~]$ cd

...al but I don't even know where I need to look in the manual. I'm haveing a little bit of a problem getting XP to print to my linux printer. I've got the smb.conf file set up to allow xp to access the corect share and it even sees the printer but it apears it doesn't have permision to print to it. What might I need to do to give it the corect permisions to print to the linux printer? My setup is the following: One XP box, Named kim1 One Redhat 7.3 Box named jerry Network Name MSHOME Printing useing cups software printername local ip subnet 192.168....

On 10/28/2020 3:31 AM, Marco Gaiarin via samba wrote: > Mandi! Dan Egli via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > >> Why on earth would samba even CARE about group permissions when user >> permissions are perfectly fine? Help me fix this? > Consider that, if POSIX ACL are enabled on this FS, the group > permission are considered as a 'mask' for all ACL, with

I configure Samba in Share mode, I can see the files but i can't write/delete files in the directory "agenda" The directory /o/aplic/NACSEG/agenda have this permission drwxrwxr-x and the owner and group is agendaglm nobody I have all valid users in the smbpasswd and /etc/passwd This is the smb.conf...........................THANKS! [global] workgroup = GLMSA server

We are using SAMBA 3.6.6 on Centos 5 with the acl_tdb VFS module. Our share is backed by storage on a SAN devices that does not support ACLs or extended attributes ... so we're trying the acl_tdb module as a mechanism to support Windows ACLs. We have verified that samba has ACL support enabled, and ACL support works find if we export the share from the local EXT4 filesystem. When trying to

On 28/10/2020 08:00, Dan Egli via samba wrote: > It's been over 24 hours and no one has even touched this. I could really > use a bit of help. Yes, it works when I create the files/dirs in samba > because of the masks I set, but that's just a kludge. It shouldn't > matter that the GROUP permissions are if the USER permissions allow > access and the file is owned by the