search for: perfectionists

What's the delay? Greetings, Aleksandar --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.

Hello, I created a table and about 10 migrations down the line I decided that I needed to add an ID column (this was actually a table for a has_many :through and I recently realized that it needs an ID column, unlike HABTM tables). I am a big perfectionist and I frequently run "SHOW COLUMNS IN table;", so I naturally expect to see the "id" column the first one listed. However,

Hello everybody and Timo. I have the next problem. With LDAP tree like ou=mail | - dc=example1.com,ou=Mail | - mail=box1 at example1.com,dc=example1.com,ou=Mail | - mail=box2 at example1.com,dc=example1.com,ou=Mail ? | - dc=example2.com,ou=Mail | - mail=box1 at example2.com,dc=example2.com,ou=Mail | - mail=box2 at example2.com,dc=example2.com,ou=Mail ? and settings in dovecot

What would be the R formulae for a two-sided test? I have a formula for a one-sided test: powertest <- function(a,m0,m1,n,s){ t1 = -qnorm(1-a) num = abs(m0-m1) * sqrt(n) t2 = num/s pow = pnorm(t1 + t2) } Would you pls let me know if you know of? Thank you, ej

Hello everyone, I'm using Samba 3.0.30 as PDC in my home-LAN, the clients are all XP Pro SP2. Everything is working as it should, although I notice an annoying and quite random login delay of 1-5 seconds for all user-machine combinations. The log lines below (log-level 2) are for example what I got about an hour ago: [2009/03/20 18:43:45, 3] smbd/open.c:open_file(240) Tester opened file

Hi all, The link contains a stingy article on AJAX and other somewhat browser dependant stuff. http://techrepublic.com.com/5254-6257-0.html?forumID=99&threadID=184332&messageID=1963135&id=2926438 Being a webdev myself and also a diehard perfectionist, I could relate to some of it. Let me state that the article does NOT represent my opinion, nor is it to fire up a discussion!! It

Ross Levis <ross@soulfm.cjb.net> wrote: > and submitted which show up problems in the LAME encoder. I thought > Velvet.wav was on the list but I just checked and couldn't find it so I > presume LAME has fixed the problem. I guess Monty has gone through the You can get velvet.wav from here: http://r3mix.50g.com/velvet.zip (2MB) Greetings, Aleksandar --- >8 ---- List

Sorry, the authentication problem still wasn't actually fixed in beta6. Now, this time I tested every possible authentication case that it really works. I'll soon create a CVS branch which is going to stabilize into the 1.0 release. I won't add new features there so it shouldn't really get broken anymore, at least because of new features.. So, two changes in this release:

Sorry, the authentication problem still wasn't actually fixed in beta6. Now, this time I tested every possible authentication case that it really works. I'll soon create a CVS branch which is going to stabilize into the 1.0 release. I won't add new features there so it shouldn't really get broken anymore, at least because of new features.. So, two changes in this release:

> The dangerous part of this is that characters are integers, so "foo" + 'x' is very likely to cause serious problems. std::string already provides such overloads though, doesn't it? So the code isn't any safer from accidental "foo" + 'x' expressions that don't include Twine/StringRef/std::string than it was before. But if the argument is that

On Jul 21, 2011, at 12:30 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >> [diff attached] > > Updated diff with test fix. (since this broke a test (printing chars > as numerical values, rather than characters) it's possible this change > is a bad idea & it could break the product code itself. Though > strangely I wasn't able to do character concatenation without my > change, so I

On Jul 21, 2011, at 12:00 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >> And for arguments, generally always use Twine as the default, it allows construction of complex things, and is still efficient when passed the equiv of a StringRef (with the toStringRef method). The only annoying thing about it is that the API to do this requires a temporary SmallVector to scribble in, which makes it more difficult to

Hi, I'm also cc'ing it to r-help. On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Kenneth Cabrera wrote: > Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 10:09:21 -0500 > From: Kenneth Cabrera <krcabrer at perseus.unalmed.edu.co> > To: kwan022 at stat.auckland.ac.nz > Subject: some questions! > > Hello Dear Ko-Kang Wang: > > I am trying to compile R v 1.6.1 . > > I am following the

Are migrations used only when you''re making changes to a database? Does it just allow the developer to avoid using raw SQL when working with databases? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

> And for arguments, generally always use Twine as the default, it allows construction of complex things, and is still efficient when passed the equiv of a StringRef (with the toStringRef method).  The only annoying thing about it is that the API to do this requires a temporary SmallVector to scribble in, which makes it more difficult to use. > > It seems that there should be a good way

Guys (and girls), I\'ve been testing Ogg Vorbis quality at home, and I thought I\'d share the results with you. For those who want the conclusion, Vorbis 1.0 RC3 sounds better than LAME 3.70 vbr/cbr (which I\'m told now that it\'s broken for VBR), at less bitrate, however, it\'s not perfect (and probably never will, since it\'s a lossy audio codec) and could use some

On Jul 22, 2011, at 2:59 PM, David Blaikie wrote: >> The dangerous part of this is that characters are integers, so "foo" + 'x' is very likely to cause serious problems. > > std::string already provides such overloads though, doesn't it? So the > code isn't any safer from accidental "foo" + 'x' expressions that > don't include

I just tried writing some controllers, etc. that would allow me to start and monitor background tasks running in new (Ruby) threads, with the idea that I''d eventually manage long-running indexing processes that way. I can kick off such threads OK (by using Thread.new in a routine called by a controller), but it seems like Rails gets huffy if those background tasks and the ordinary