search for: perfectionist

What's the delay? Greetings, Aleksandar --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be ignored/filtered.

Hello, I created a table and about 10 migrations down the line I decided that I needed to add an ID column (this was actually a table for a has_many :through and I recently realized that it needs an ID column, unlike HABTM tables). I am a big perfectionist and I frequently run "SHOW COLUMNS IN table;", so I naturally expect to see the "id" column the first one listed. However, if I just do a standard add_column() migration, the column will appear on the bottom. Is there any way to re-arrange this? The Rails docs says that there is...

...t}, \ =userdb_home=/var/vmail/%Ld/%Ln, \ =userdb_quota_rule=*:storage=%{ldap:mailQuota}M pass_filter = (&(objectClass=mailUser)(accountStatus=active)(mail=%u)) iterate_attrs = mail=user iterate_filter = (&(objectClass=mailUser)(accountStatus=active)) all works fine. But my soul of perfectionist do not like this configuration because in every mailbox record duplicated information about domain: mail=box1 at example2.com and dc=example2.com I want to set next LDAP tree ou=mail | - dc=example1.com,ou=Mail | - mail=box1,dc=example1.com,ou=Mail | - mail=box2,dc=example1.com,ou=Mail...

What would be the R formulae for a two-sided test? I have a formula for a one-sided test: powertest <- function(a,m0,m1,n,s){ t1 = -qnorm(1-a) num = abs(m0-m1) * sqrt(n) t2 = num/s pow = pnorm(t1 + t2) } Would you pls let me know if you know of? Thank you, ej

...ese two files are around 2MB together and should not cause a four second delay on my 100MBit link. I guess there is some problematic setting in the registry hive that causes that delay. Has anyone around here ever noticed that "problem"? I know a few seconds are no big deal, but I'm a perfectionist anyway. :) Greets, Eric

Hi all, The link contains a stingy article on AJAX and other somewhat browser dependant stuff. http://techrepublic.com.com/5254-6257-0.html?forumID=99&threadID=184332&messageID=1963135&id=2926438 Being a webdev myself and also a diehard perfectionist, I could relate to some of it. Let me state that the article does NOT represent my opinion, nor is it to fire up a discussion!! It is merely an FYI. Kind regards, Gerard. -- "Who cares if it doesn''t do anything? It was made with our new Triple-Iso-Bifurcated-Krypton-Gate-MOS...

Ross Levis <ross@soulfm.cjb.net> wrote: > and submitted which show up problems in the LAME encoder. I thought > Velvet.wav was on the list but I just checked and couldn't find it so I > presume LAME has fixed the problem. I guess Monty has gone through the You can get velvet.wav from here: http://r3mix.50g.com/velvet.zip (2MB) Greetings, Aleksandar --- >8 ---- List

Sorry, the authentication problem still wasn't actually fixed in beta6. Now, this time I tested every possible authentication case that it really works. I'll soon create a CVS branch which is going to stabilize into the 1.0 release. I won't add new features there so it shouldn't really get broken anymore, at least because of new features.. So, two changes in this release:

Sorry, the authentication problem still wasn't actually fixed in beta6. Now, this time I tested every possible authentication case that it really works. I'll soon create a CVS branch which is going to stabilize into the 1.0 release. I won't add new features there so it shouldn't really get broken anymore, at least because of new features.. So, two changes in this release:

> The dangerous part of this is that characters are integers, so "foo" + 'x' is very likely to cause serious problems. std::string already provides such overloads though, doesn't it? So the code isn't any safer from accidental "foo" + 'x' expressions that don't include Twine/StringRef/std::string than it was before. But if the argument is that

On Jul 21, 2011, at 12:30 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >> [diff attached] > > Updated diff with test fix. (since this broke a test (printing chars > as numerical values, rather than characters) it's possible this change > is a bad idea & it could break the product code itself. Though > strangely I wasn't able to do character concatenation without my > change, so I

On Jul 21, 2011, at 12:00 AM, David Blaikie wrote: >> And for arguments, generally always use Twine as the default, it allows construction of complex things, and is still efficient when passed the equiv of a StringRef (with the toStringRef method). The only annoying thing about it is that the API to do this requires a temporary SmallVector to scribble in, which makes it more difficult to

Hi, I'm also cc'ing it to r-help. On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, Kenneth Cabrera wrote: > Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2002 10:09:21 -0500 > From: Kenneth Cabrera <krcabrer at perseus.unalmed.edu.co> > To: kwan022 at stat.auckland.ac.nz > Subject: some questions! > > Hello Dear Ko-Kang Wang: > > I am trying to compile R v 1.6.1 . > > I am following the

Are migrations used only when you''re making changes to a database? Does it just allow the developer to avoid using raw SQL when working with databases? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to

> And for arguments, generally always use Twine as the default, it allows construction of complex things, and is still efficient when passed the equiv of a StringRef (with the toStringRef method).  The only annoying thing about it is that the API to do this requires a temporary SmallVector to scribble in, which makes it more difficult to use. > > It seems that there should be a good way

...tiny lack of attack on the string instrument, but no difference on the ambience forest sound. It\'s not perfect though. It beats LAME hands down, at 133 kbps it sounds extremely better than an MP3. I could archive at this quality and be happy, but I can tell the difference, and I\'m perfectionist. Oggenc Q5 I told an average 7 out of 10 times (6/10,8/10,6/10) getting dangerously close to the \"toss a coin\" statistics (barring Murphy\'s laws of course). Which makes Q5 a decent choice, except for the bitrate (170 kbps). Why does it need that much space on such a small qua...

...callers might use your API. From the perspective of a > caller, a Twine argument is at least as expressive as a StringRef > (since all StringRefs can be Twined implicitly), but it takes that > extra step to write the implementation. > > Perhaps I'm aiming for some kind of purist/perfectionist argument that > isn't necessary or practical, but I hope I've been clear in explaining > my uncertainty/issue here. Yes, I'm deeply unhappy about this aspect of our string api's. -Chris

I just tried writing some controllers, etc. that would allow me to start and monitor background tasks running in new (Ruby) threads, with the idea that I''d eventually manage long-running indexing processes that way. I can kick off such threads OK (by using Thread.new in a routine called by a controller), but it seems like Rails gets huffy if those background tasks and the ordinary