Displaying 20 results from an estimated 29 matches for "penman".
Did you mean:
penlan
2006 Feb 09
1
Processed: Re: Bug#352043: dovecot-imapd: logcheck rules miss some lines
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 352043 logcheck
Bug#352043: please integrate dovecot logcheck rule in the dovecot-common package
Bug reassigned from package `dovecot-common' to `logcheck'.
> retitle 352043 Please provide a backport of logcheck
Bug#352043: please integrate dovecot logcheck rule in the dovecot-common package
Changed Bug title.
>
2006 Feb 11
1
Bug#352337: please tighten permissions on /etc/logcheck
Package: logcheck
Severity: wishlist
I see no reason why /etc/logcheck should have any more permissions
than 0750. Please consider removing access rights from 'other'.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
2006 Feb 22
2
Bug#353962: integrate courier file in logcheck-database
Package: courier-imap-ssl,logcheck-database
Severity: wishlist
Please move /etc/logcheck/*/courier to the courier packages and out
of logcheck-database.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked
2005 Jul 28
2
Bug#320274: logcheck-database: Please add pop3 to dovecot
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.40
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
Please duplicate the imap-login related lines and change them to filter
out the equivalent messages emitted by pop3-login.
regards
Andrew
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel:
2005 Jun 03
2
[ttroxell@debian.org: Re: Logcheck rules from other packages]
...9;m not sure if this message ever made it to you, Jamie. I had a reverse DNS
problem shortly after it was sent.
----- Forwarded message from Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org> -----
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 01:22:18 -0400
From: Todd Troxell <ttroxell at debian.org>
To: "Jamie L. Penman-Smithson" <jamie at silverdream.org>
Subject: Re: Logcheck rules from other packages
Hey Jamie,
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 09:57:32PM +0100, Jamie L. Penman-Smithson wrote:
> Hey Todd,
>
> I'm not so sure about the policy of handing over responsibility for
> package speci...
2005 Apr 29
3
Bug#303661: logcheck: More openntpd improvements
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.39
Followup-For: Bug #303661
Attached is another entry that suppresses the adjustment messages
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.7-grsec
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages logcheck depends on:
ii
2005 May 19
3
Bug#309772: please add ignore lines for autossh
Package: logcheck-database
Severity: wishlist
Hi!
if autossh debug is enabled it logs to syslog, thus the messages go thru
logcheck, messages are in this form
May 19 14:02:55 sagara autossh[1909]: port set to 0, monitoring disabled
so this is the ignore line
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ autossh\[[0-9]+\]: .*$
thanks,
filippo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment
2005 Mar 22
3
Bug#300888: logcheck-database: database skip postgrey ignore pattern
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.35
Severity: minor
logcheck-database contain postgrey ignore file, but postgrey first
attempt is listed in logcheck report
$ dpkg -l postgrey
ii postgrey 1.18-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-C3EZRA
Locale: LANG=it_IT,
2005 Apr 28
1
Bug#306695: nagios: logcheck lines, please
On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 22:10 -0400, Steve Gran wrote:
> ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ nagios: EXTERNAL COMMAND: PROCESS_SERVICE_CHECK_RESULT
>
> (although that may be too broad)
Can you provide the log messages that this matches?
Thanks,
--
-jamie <jamie at silverdream.org> | spamtrap: spam at silverdream.org
w: http://www.silverdream.org | p: sms at silverdream.org
pgp
2004 Jul 15
5
Bug#259603: logcheck-database: postfix/lmtp rules do not match some configurations
package: logcheck-database
version: 1.2.23
severity: wishlist
The current regexp's for postfix/lmtp..
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ postfix/lmtp\[[0-9]+\]: [0-9A-F]:
to=<[^[:space:]]+>, orig_to=<[^[:space:]]+>, relay=[^[:space:]]+\],
delay=[0-9]+ status=sent \(250 2\.1\.5 Ok\)$
..doesn't catch these messages:
Jul 15 17:15:16 lorien postfix/lmtp[17151]: C1170480008B:
2005 Feb 20
1
Rename violations.ignore.d/logcheck-pureftp
<nitpickyness>
To avoid possible confusion, shouldn't this be named logcheck-pureftpd,
or logcheck-pure-ftpd (instead of logcheck-pureftp)?
Or is there a reason (that I've missed) it's this way?
</nitpickyness>
-j
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This
2005 May 03
1
Re: [Logcheck-commits] CVS logcheck/docs
On Tue, 2005-05-03 at 07:20 +0000, CVS User maks-guest wrote:
> Modified Files:
> logcheck.sgml
> Log Message:
>
> minor addition describe 3 layers.
> remove the url tag not recognized by docbook2man.
> +
> + <para>The reported messages are sorted in three different layers.
> + The system events verbosity is governed by aboves level choice.
> + The
2005 May 15
1
Bug#191637: New rules for qpopper
.... \[pop_get_command.c:152\]$
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ in.qpopper\[[0-9]+\]:
\(v[.[:digit:]]+\) Unable to get canonical name of client [.[:digit:]]+:
Name or service not known \(-2\) \[pop_init.c:1196\]$
If there are any further messages that should be ignored, let us know.
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <jamie at silverdream.org>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: oubliette.z at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application...
2006 Feb 12
1
Bug#338732: logcheck-database: ignore rule for package cvs
...of cvs a note.
I've added the following rule to cvs, which matches the messages you
provided:
^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ cvs-pserver\[[0-9]+\]: connect
from [._[:alnum:]-]+ \([0-9.]{7,15}\)$
This'll be included in the next release.
Thanks for your bug report,
--
-Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <jamie at silverdream.org>
t: +44 1273 424795; f: +44 1273 424795
PGP: C0A7 955E EED6 A309 23D7 863B C76A 26A3 F0DC FCA8
never send mail to: oubliette.z at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/...
2006 Jul 03
0
Re: postfix logcheck
also sprach Jamie L. Penman-Smithson <lists at silverdream.org> [2006.07.02.0012 +0200]:
> >As far as I can tell, Postfix adds extended status codes, so instead
> >of "250", you now get "250 2.0.0".
>
> Most of the rules have been updated to include these. If you find
> any whi...
2006 Mar 29
2
Bug#359878: logcheck: extend exim rules to cope with multiple recipients
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.43a
Severity: normal
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8
Versions of packages logcheck depends on:
ii adduser 3.77 Add and remove
2006 Feb 06
1
Bug#351669: logcheck: [manual] the sudo(1) is missing from EXAMPLES
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.35
Severity: minor
Current manual reads:
EXAMPLES
logcheck can be invoked directly thanks to su(8) or sudo(8), which
change the user ID:
logcheck -o -t Check the logfiles without updating the offset. Print
everything to STDOUT
I believe this shuold be formatted as:
EXAMPLES
logcheck can be invoked directly thanks
2006 Jan 03
1
Bug#344832: (fwd) Re: Bug#344832: correct subject header
----- Forwarded message from General Stone <generalstone at gmx.net> -----
X-Original-To: maks at sternwelten.at
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 14:59:03 +0100
From: General Stone <generalstone at gmx.net>
To: maximilian attems <maks at sternwelten.at>
Subject: Re: [Logcheck-devel] Bug#344832: correct subject header
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 02:09:48PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
>
2006 Feb 21
2
Bug#353868: logcheck-database: no longer ignores "spamd: checking message ..."
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.43a
Severity: minor
Since last weekend's upgrade of logcheck-database from 1.2.42 to
1.2.43a, logcheck stopped ignoring routine SpamAssassin messages of
the form
Feb 20 21:36:16 tux64 spamd[4665]: spamd: checking message <20060220190721.0E0B41C5207 at llwb563.servidoresdns.net> for amu:7286
Could you please edit the second pattern in
2006 Feb 21
2
Bug#353815: logcheck: Ignore Pocket PC/synce/USB messages, please
Package: logcheck
Version: 1.2.42
Severity: wishlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Here are some more messages that can be safely ignored:
localhost kernel: drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial Driver core
localhost kernel: drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial.c: USB Serial support registered for PocketPC PDA
localhost kernel: drivers/usb/serial/ipaq.c: USB PocketPC PDA driver