search for: peek

...xenvif *vif = netdev_priv(dev); + unsigned int ring_slots_required; BUG_ON(skb->dev != dev); if (vif->netbk == NULL) goto drop; + ring_slots_required = xen_netbk_count_skb_slots(vif, skb); + + /* Reserve ring slots for the worst-case number of fragments. */ + vif->rx_req_cons_peek += ring_slots_required; + /* Drop the packet if the target domain has no receive buffers. */ - if (!xenvif_rx_schedulable(vif)) + if (!xenvif_rx_schedulable(vif)) { + vif->rx_req_cons_peek -= ring_slots_required; goto drop; + } - /* Reserve ring slots for the worst-case number of fragmen...

Am 04.05.2015 um 21:04 schrieb Santiago Vila: > Greetings. > > Thanks to Jelmer Vernooij, who has just uploaded version 2.2.16 for > Debian unstable, I can confirm that this bug may still be reproduced > in version 2.2.16, so it has *not* been fixed yet. > > Several months ago I was told "I can't reproduce it in dovecot hg", or > something like that. Well,

...nscript: Source Destination Info c.c.c.c s.s.s.s Request: DONE s.s.s.s c.c.c.c Response: 20 OK Idle completed. c.c.c.c s.s.s.s Request: 21 uid store 1:20 -Flags (\Seen) s.s.s.s c.c.c.c Response: * 1 FETCH (UID 1 FLAGS (\Recent NonJunk)) c.c.c.c s.s.s.s Request: 22 UID fetch 2 (UID RFC822.SIZE BODY.PEEK[]) s.s.s.s c.c.c.c Response: * 2 FETCH (UID 2 RFC822.SIZE 1339 BODY[] {1339} c.c.c.c s.s.s.s Request: 23 UID fetch 3 (UID RFC822.SIZE BODY.PEEK[]) s.s.s.s c.c.c.c Response: * 3 FETCH (UID 3 RFC822.SIZE 1342 BODY[] {1342} c.c.c.c s.s.s.s Request: 24 UID fetch 5 (UID RFC822.SIZE BODY.PEEK[]) s.s.s.s...

...dure: > > telnet localhost 143 > > and then type this: > > A0001 CAPABILITY > A0002 LOGIN "bluser" "bluser" > A0003 SELECT "inbox-b" > A0004 EXPUNGE > A0005 FETCH 1:12 RFC822.SIZE > A0006 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER > A0007 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[TEXT] > A0008 STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted) > A0009 EXPUNGE > A0010 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER > A0011 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[TEXT] > A0012 STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted) > A0013 EXPUNGE > A0014 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER > A0015 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[TEXT] > A0016 STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen...

I have just verified with IMAP commands. This is the procedure: telnet localhost 143 and then type this: A0001 CAPABILITY A0002 LOGIN "bluser" "bluser" A0003 SELECT "inbox-b" A0004 EXPUNGE A0005 FETCH 1:12 RFC822.SIZE A0006 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER A0007 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[TEXT] A0008 STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted) A0009 EXPUNGE A0010 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER A0011 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[TEXT] A0012 STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted) A0013 EXPUNGE A0014 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER A0015 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[TEXT] A0016 STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted) A0017 EXPUNGE A0018 FETCH 1 RFC822....

...>> >> and then type this: >> >> A0001 CAPABILITY >> A0002 LOGIN "bluser" "bluser" >> A0003 SELECT "inbox-b" >> A0004 EXPUNGE >> A0005 FETCH 1:12 RFC822.SIZE >> A0006 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER >> A0007 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[TEXT] >> A0008 STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted) >> A0009 EXPUNGE >> A0010 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER >> A0011 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[TEXT] >> A0012 STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted) >> A0013 EXPUNGE >> A0014 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER >> A0015 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[TEXT] &...

Hi, On 05/04/15 10:59, Timo Sirainen wrote: > On 28 Apr 2015, at 23:49, Nagy, Attila <bra at fsn.hu> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. >> >> I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively handle boundless fetches (like a list with all wanted UIDs, or simply 1:* if all are needed), do...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Usingt ./sbin/dovecot --version 2.2.rc2 (7a08461c5559) with Maildir, 2 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[ALL] dumps core, bt full is: #0 0x00007fa166e721b5 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #1 0x00007fa166e74fc0 in abort () from /lib/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x00007fa16721ac47 in default_fatal_finish (type=LOG_TYPE_PANIC, status=0) at failures.c:...

...dure: > > telnet localhost 143 > > and then type this: > > A0001 CAPABILITY > A0002 LOGIN "bluser" "bluser" > A0003 SELECT "inbox-b" > A0004 EXPUNGE > A0005 FETCH 1:12 RFC822.SIZE > A0006 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER > A0007 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[TEXT] > A0008 STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted) > A0009 EXPUNGE > A0010 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER > A0011 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[TEXT] > A0012 STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen \Deleted) > A0013 EXPUNGE > A0014 FETCH 1 RFC822.HEADER > A0015 FETCH 1 BODY.PEEK[TEXT] > A0016 STORE 1 +FLAGS (\Seen...

Hi, imapc does a lot of UID FETCH $UID (BODY.PEEK[]), which is nice, because it works even with the dumbest IMAP server, altough it really kills performance, especially on high latency lines. I wonder: if IMAP servers can effectively handle boundless fetches (like a list with all wanted UIDs, or simply 1:* if all are needed), do you see this...

...g all contents of the calling environments if the object to be saved is *not* evaluated, although it is not that simple either. After many hours of troubleshooting, I'm still confused. Here is a reproducible example (also attached) with output. I let the code and the output talk for itself: peek <- function(file, from=1, to=500) { cat("--------------------------------------\n") cat(sprintf("%s: %d bytes\n", file, file.info(file)$size)) bfr <- suppressWarnings(readBin(file, what="character", n=to)) bfr <- gsub("(\001|\002|\003|\004|\005|\0...

ERROR: Connection dropped by IMAP server. Query: FETCH 1 (FLAGS UID RFC822.SIZE INTERNALDATE BODY.PEEK[HEADER.FIELDS (Date To Cc From Subject X-Priority Importance Priority Content-Type)]) Will try an update just now. -- Kind Regards, Gavin Henry. Managing Director. T +44 (0) 1224 279484 M +44 (0) 7930 323266 F +44 (0) 1224 824887 E ghenry at suretecsystems.com Open Source. Open Solutions(tm)....

...ot;Other users currently active:" piece of information. I could track it myself in the database based on login/logout, but that doesn''t really count for people just leaving the computer logged in and never coming back. Does Rails have an API for me to monitor sessions and take a peek at their info? I''m googling as best I can but I have to sift through all the references to developer conferences with "ruby sessions" :) D -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

...ain up to 50 MB of attachments, we risk to download 5000MB from IMAP for every page. An option might be to perform two FETCH for each message: - one fetch with just the BODYSTRUCTURE (where we can get the attachments name and size and the text/html parts). - one fetch with the body parts (BODY.PEEK[]) we need to build the preview (text + html). We are wondering if there is a single FETCH command to get the text and html parts (needed to build the preview) with only the name and the size of the attachments without downloading the entire message. Thanks. -- Alessio Cecchi Postmaster @ ht...

...in to a Windows XP box, I get the complaint that the roaming profile cannot be downloaded because it is not owned by the user that is logging in (it is, and all permissions are correct), and in the samba log file there is a successful connection to the profiles share followed by: Could not peek rid out of sid <correct-SID-value> (twice) User <username> with invalid SID <same-SID-value> in passdb (3 times) followed by a successful connection to the home directory share, which is fully useable from the Windows client at this point. If I replace the "server.domai...

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26980 Summary: GT230M/nouveau: X server hangs spontaneously Product: xorg Version: 7.5 Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

Hi, Has anyone had any luck getting Peek-a-Booty (http://www.peekabooty.org/) working under Wine? It starts up OK and its web interface works at first but when I try to establish a connection to another node (hitting "Connect" in the node manager page) the web interface stops responding. Stephen

Hi, All of a sudden, my samba logs are filling up with errors like: Could not peek rid out of sid S-1-5-21-3203556629-3307610231-1688239997-3018 Now it appears that I'm no longer authenticating because I cannot get to private-by-user directories. Anyone know how to fix this? Thanks. -- James

...to out; > > a_op = mapping->a_op; > if (!aop) > goto out; > if (a_op->isolate_page) > ret = 1; > out: > return ret; > > } > > It works under PG_lock but with this, we need trylock_page to peek > whether it's movable non-lru or not for scanning pfn. Hm I hoped that with READ_ONCE() we could do the peek safely without trylock_page, if we use it only as a heuristic. But I guess it would require at least RCU-level protection of the page->mapping->a_op->isolate_page chain....

...to out; > > a_op = mapping->a_op; > if (!aop) > goto out; > if (a_op->isolate_page) > ret = 1; > out: > return ret; > > } > > It works under PG_lock but with this, we need trylock_page to peek > whether it's movable non-lru or not for scanning pfn. Hm I hoped that with READ_ONCE() we could do the peek safely without trylock_page, if we use it only as a heuristic. But I guess it would require at least RCU-level protection of the page->mapping->a_op->isolate_page chain....