search for: pcix

Hi all, I have two HP DL145 G1 machines, running centos4 (2.6.9-22.0.2.ELsmp). Nics are recognized as: eth0: Tigon3 [partno(BCM95704) rev 2002 PHY(5704)] (PCIX:100MHz:64-bit) 10/100/1000BaseT Ethernet 00:00:1a:19:f1:05 eth0: RXcsums[1] LinkChgREG[0] MIirq[0] ASF[0] Split[0] WireSpeed[1] TSOcap [1] eth1: Tigon3 [partno(BCM95704) rev 2002 PHY(5704)] (PCIX:100MHz:64-bit) 10/100/1000BaseT Ethernet 00:00:1a:19:f1:04 eth1: RXcsums[1] LinkChgREG[0] MIirq[0] AS...

...of you guys faced this issue. So I am having an issue of no connectivity with my NICs. I have manually configured and I have tried dhcp. The OS sees the NICs loads the drivers, but I cannout ping anything on the lan. The only card that works out of the box is my only PCIE intel dual 1000 nic. my PCIX based intel pro 1000 nor my realk r8169 nics work, yet debian sees the NIC. I can bring them up and configure no errors. I just cannot ping anything on my lan any help would be appericated Thanks

We are implementing a ZFS storage server (NAS) to replace a NetApp box. I have a Sun server with two dual Ultra320 PCIX cards connected to 4 shelves of 12 500GB disks each, yielding a total of 24TB of raw storage. I''m kicking around the different ways to carve this space up, balancing storage space with data integrity. The layout that I have come to think is the best for me is to create a raidz2 pool for...

Just curious: has anyone seen or heard about a USB-based T1/E1 interface device? I've seen some serious T1/E1 testing equipment that is USB-based, but I was wondering if there was something more generic, like a Zaptel-ish T1/E1 that used USB instead of PCI/PCIx. Thanks! -MC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070502/7146b4cc/attachment.htm

...n-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com [mailto:xen-users-bounces@lists.xensource.com] On Behalf Of Jamie J. Begin Sent: June 10, 2008 1:12 PM To: xen-users@lists.xensource.com Subject: [Xen-users] Missed interrupt. Increasing latency to 5 ms in orderto compensate. I am using pciback to pass a Digium PCIX analog telephony card to an Asterisk domU. Seemingly at random times, the card wigs out with the following appended to my /var/log/messages: Jun 10 12:17:19 asterisk01 kernel: wctdm24xxp0: Missed interrupt. Increasing latency to 4 ms in order to compensate. Jun 10 14:01:01 asterisk01 kernel: wct...

...ered protocol family 2 IP: routing cache hash table of 2048 buckets, 112Kbytes TCP: Hash tables configured (established 524288 bind 37449) Initializing IPsec netlink socket NET: Registered protocol family 1 NET: Registered protocol family 17 ACPI: (supports S0 S1 S5) ACPI wakeup devices: PCE0 PCE1 PCIX PCIB USB1 USB2 USBE KBC0 MSE0 Freeing unused kernel memory: 164k freed SCSI subsystem initialized libata version 1.10 loaded. ata_piix version 1.03 ACPI: PCI interrupt 0000:00:1f.2[A] -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 193 ata: 0x1f0 IDE port busy PCI: Setting latency timer of device 0000:00:1f.2...

Hello all, I compiled the kernel with the xen patch and I seam to have trouble with some kernel modules, like ATI''s proprietary driver. The system seams considerably slower than before, this might be because of the video drivers, or maybe the RAM alocated to dom0 (512Mb instead of it''s usual 1Gb). When I try to run xend, it dies with a SIG 15. I attached the log file. Anyone

Hi- I have an upcoming order for a bunch of asterisk boxes, and I'm considering using an "assembled" package for the server, instead of building them from components as I usually do. Does anyone have experience with the Dell PowerEdge 750 server, or any other 1U rackmount server for use with asterisk? Thanks in advance Scott Stingel Scott M. Stingel President, Emerging Voice

On 06/13/2015 05:26 AM, Rafeal Stewart wrote: > The only card that works out of the box is my only PCIE intel dual 1000 > nic. my PCIX based intel pro 1000 nor my realk r8169 nics work, yet > debian sees the NIC. I can bring them up and configure no errors. I just > cannot ping anything on my lan Are you connecting all of the Ethernet adapters to the same LAN, with different addresses in the same IP subnet? You might have...

...tor Files: create: usr/src/uts/common/io/pci_cap.c create: usr/src/uts/common/sys/pci_cap.h update: usr/src/uts/common/Makefile.files update: usr/src/uts/common/io/pci_intr_lib.c update: usr/src/uts/common/io/pcie.c update: usr/src/uts/sun4u/io/pci/pci_pci.c update: usr/src/uts/sun4u/io/pci/pcix.c

...6404990 Cleanup dead code in pci cap library Files: update: usr/src/uts/common/io/pci_cap.c update: usr/src/uts/common/io/pci_intr_lib.c update: usr/src/uts/common/io/pcie.c update: usr/src/uts/common/sys/pci_cap.h update: usr/src/uts/sun4u/io/pci/pci_pci.c update: usr/src/uts/sun4u/io/pci/pcix.c

...straightforward to add the driver built for 32-bit x86 kernels as well. You can find the driver disk and instructions here: http://www.bodgit-n-scarper.com/code.html#centos (By all means stick this into the forums too if it''s of any use) Matt [0] http://www.areca.com.tw/products/html/pcix-sata.htm -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.caosity.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20050320/23db6ebb/attachment.bin

Hello, I am desperately trying to get pci-passthrough to working. I want to pass a tg3 nic to domU. when booting domU I get a lot of messages: pcifront pci-0: pciback not responding!!! in domU, "ifconfig eth... adress up" hangs for 2 minutes, finally ifconfig -a shows a correct setting with no data transmitted rx/tx The IP Adress is being assigned, but there is no data transmission

Hi Centos Users What are the advantages of 64 Bit and respective 32 Bit installation of Centos? With PAE 32 Bit installation can address huge amount of RAM. As a desktop system, I prefer 32 Bit installation because of teething troubles in 64 Bit Linux world. When would you choose 64 Bit and when 32 Bit? We are running mostly application and web services. Is this true that with 32 Bit

Hi, I'm looking at setting up a small production system - predominantly for voice mail and IVR (with a few extensions and hold music MP3's). I've found a couple of IBM X330 servers, with dual 1.13Ghz P3 processors. My question is; is a dual 1.13Ghz P3 server sufficient to run for real-life demands? I come from a Unix/Mac background, so I'm not swayed by the '3Ghz'

Hi all! We use pxelinux for booting a diskless Linux from whitch we install all our systems. But we discovered some Problems: - With v1.75 the Kernel is fetched from the TFTP-Server with no problem, but it gets not started on Broadcom NetXtreme with newer PXE-Bioses - With v2.04, pxelinux even seems not to be able to fetch the kernel from the TFTP-Server. This affects also Intel's

I have an old server (old hardware) that's been running 6.4 with kernel 2.6.32-279.19.1.el6.i686, no problem. Except, any kernel update after that causes it not to boot anymore. All I get is a blinking cursor on the screen, nothing else. Is this the end of this hardware, no more kernel updates after this? For reference, these are all the options that kernel is booting up with (lines

Hi folks: At work, I have an R510, and R610 and an R710 - all with the H700 PERC controller. Based on experiments, it seems like there is no way to bypass the PERC controller - it seems like one can only access the individual disks if they are set up in RAID0 each. This brings me to ask some questions: a. Is it fine (in terms of an intelligent controller coming in the way of ZFS) to have the

...root at xentwo ~]# cat /etc/issue CentOS release 5.5 (Final) Kernel \r on an \m [root at xentwo ~]# uname -a Linux xentwo 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5xen #1 SMP Wed Jan 5 19:32:33 EST 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root at xentwo ~]# dmesg | grep eth0 eth0: Tigon3 [partno(BCM95704A6) rev 2002 PHY(5704)] (PCIX:133MHz:64-bit) 10/100/1000Base-T Ethernet 00:11:43:59:7c:ed eth0: RXcsums[1] LinkChgREG[0] MIirq[0] ASF[0] WireSpeed[1] TSOcap[1] eth0: dma_rwctrl[769f4000] dma_mask[64-bit] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready tg3: eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, half duplex. tg3: eth0: Flow control is off f...

All, I've got a machine running CentOS 5.3 and this machine has got 2 - built-in 1 Gig NICs and a expansion card with 4 - 100 Meg NICs. For whatever reason at install time, it made the expansion card eth0 through eth3 and the internal ports eth4 and eth5. And by default the 'machine' is known on the network by the eth0 NIC, so my throughput is limited to 100 Mb. How can I force