search for: paywalled

On 05/10/2019 14:10, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 05/10/2019 13:41, lejeczek via samba wrote: >> hi everyone, >> >> I believe a resolution is there - >> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4367771 > Which is behind a paywall ;-) >> >> But what I'm hoping for is an expert would comment how >> would this apply >> to Samba with LDAP

hi everyone, I believe a resolution is there - https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4367771 But what I'm hoping for is an expert would comment how would this apply to Samba with LDAP backend? many thanks, L.

On Nov 18, 2015, at 9:49 PM, Devin Reade <gdr at gno.org> wrote: > > The one thing I would point out regarding the above link is that despite > conventional UNIX wisdom, *don't* put /usr on a separate filesystem > in CentOS 7. <sarcasm>Thank you RedHat</sarcasm> > > Flames to /dev/null. Sorry, you don?t get to throw that grenade and then run away. The

Hello, My team and I have recently published an LLVM-based tool at “Cryptography and Security in Computing Systems 2016” (CS2), and we would like to add it on the list of LLVM related publications. The goal of our tool is to automatically protect the code being compiled against fault injection attacks *Title:* Compilation of a Countermeasure Against Instruction-Skip Fault Attacks Available

...ARP or the small local system drive, then attach to a server?s disk to complete the boot process. > The main message is that while CentOS 6 and before *could* have > / and /usr on different filesystems, don't do it with CentOS 7 > per <https://access.redhat.com/solutions/53005> (paywalled). I don?t need to pierce the paywall to know it?s a bad idea. This is enough of a clue: $ ls -l /bin lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 7 Jul 7 2014 /bin -> usr/bin [1]: See page 4-8 in the SVR3.2 sysadmin?s guide: http://goo.gl/E9quko

On 05/10/2019 15:20, lejeczek via samba wrote: > > On 05/10/2019 14:10, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 05/10/2019 13:41, lejeczek via samba wrote: >>> hi everyone, >>> >>> I believe a resolution is there - >>> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4367771 >> Which is behind a paywall ;-) >>> But what I'm hoping for is an expert

Hello all- First off I'm not a dev, just a small business owner trying to start up. I don't have a budget for much of anything & wind up doing most everything myself, which for the last year includes evaluating virtual infrastructure offerings. It's quite discouraging to see just how much doesn't "just work" for someone like me- unfortunately oVirt included (no

Hi Chad, On Aug 6, 2013, at 7:46 AM, Chad Rosier <chad.rosier at gmail.com> wrote: > All, > I have some code that looks like the following: > > { > double a, b, c; > for (...) { > ... > a = lots of FP math; > b = lots of FP math; > c = lots of FP math; > if (cond) { > a = 0.0; > b = 0.1; > c = 0.2; >

Thanks, Mark. I will give the paper a look. On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Mark Lacey <mark.lacey at apple.com> wrote: > Hi Chad, > > On Aug 6, 2013, at 7:46 AM, Chad Rosier <chad.rosier at gmail.com> wrote: > > > All, > > I have some code that looks like the following: > > > > { > > double a, b, c; > > for (...) { > >

All, I have some code that looks like the following: { double a, b, c; for (...) { ... a = lots of FP math; b = lots of FP math; c = lots of FP math; if (cond) { a = 0.0; b = 0.1; c = 0.2; } ... } } Could we not convert the hammock into a diamond and move the initial computation of a, b, and c into the else block. Something like this: {

On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 1:18 AM David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > I think it would be useful for the discussion to have a clear threat model that this intends to defend against and a rough analysis of the security benefits that this is believed to bring. I view this as being even more about a ROP defense. Dealing with spill slots is, IMO, a separate issue, more

On Tue, March 31, 2015 16:18, Frank Cox wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 16:11:38 -0400 > James B. Byrne wrote: > >> Does anyone have any idea what has happened and why I might be >> getting that message? > > I don't use that but have you checked to see if you now have a > "rpmsave" file left after installing the update? If so, that's your > old

...ves. Beyond that, I don't really want to get into a flame war on stuff that has been hashed through before. The main message is that while CentOS 6 and before *could* have / and /usr on different filesystems, don't do it with CentOS 7 per <https://access.redhat.com/solutions/53005> (paywalled). TL;DR: you'll have trouble booting some configurations including those using iSCSI. Devin

Fwiw we pay for Google Workspace. I think there is a pricing issue though, but I guess changing it would affect their income from their bigger customers. We just have 5 servers, and don't want any personal support. We'd be fine to pay what we'd consider a reasonable fee I think. I contacted Redhat to ask about their licensing and if we could fit somehow into it (i.e the personal

I seem to have run into https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855640, because when I tried the fix/work-around at the end (comment 11), ethtool -K eth0 gro off, my download speed by speedtest went from undetectable to ~150Mb/s. However, it was not able to connect for the upload test, and so something may still be off. Non-virtual machines can do the upload test, so it's not just a

The latest version seems to have a bug. One of my users went to look at a paper in Phy Rev E, and the firefox pdf view looked fine... but what printed had garbage for scales on the graphs. Then I had him use the firefox print preview... and it was garbage. Looked at it on my system, ditto, and firefox was updated yesterday on all our systems. Save as (why isn't there an "open"?) a

Where did you read 2k IOPS? Each disk is able to do about 75iops as I'm using SATA disk, getting even closer to 2000 it's impossible Il 13 ott 2017 9:42 AM, "Szymon Miotk" <szymon.miotk at gmail.com> ha scritto: > Depends what you need. > 2K iops for small file writes is not a bad result. > In my case I had a system that was just poorly written and it was >

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 3:34 AM David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > Thanks, > > On 07/08/2020 23:28, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 1:18 AM David Chisnall > > <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > >> I think it would be useful for the discussion to have a clear threat model that this intends to defend against and

...3-space by plotting the points and then constructing the Pareto frontier. Moreover is is straightforward to generate this frontier using the 'rgl' package. And this is what I do. LITERATURE Three-dimensional Pareto frontier visualization is reported in the literature. For instance (not paywalled -- thanks guys!): Madetoja, Elina, Henri Ruotsalainen, Veli-Matti M?nkk?nen, Jari H?m?l?inen, and Kalyanmoy Deb. 2008. Visualizing multi-dimensional Pareto-optimal fronts with a 3D virtual reality system. IEEE Proceedings. ISBN-13 978-83-60810-14-9. Madetoja etal (2008) also...