search for: paves

Hi all, We are trying to upgrade to iptables 1.4.1+ however the ipp2p module now it is included in the xtables-addons modules. In the xtables-addons modules the commad line for ipp2p is changed and the -m ipp2p --ipp2p option is not supported anymore .... instead the maintainer requires that we use -m ipp2p --bit ... -m ipp2p --kaza for each different P2P protocol. as a result shorewall does

hello, can i authenticate samba to pam and then ldap? thank you. --David Weise OIT Rider University "The real race is not on the hot, paved road, the torturous off-road course or the smooth-surface velodrome. It is in the electrochemical pathways of your mind."--Alexi Grewal

Dear listers, I was used to package pgirmess under Windows with everything OK, but, for the first time, I had a trial this afternoon on Ubuntu 7.10 gutsy (I have a double boot computer and work more and more under unix) and R 2.7.0. Everything went OK except this: sudo R CMD check pgirmess ..... * checking examples ... ERROR Running examples in 'pgirmess-Ex.R' failed. The error most

On somewhat long-running samba AD DC instances (4.5.8-Debian, Stretch), we're seeming massive RAM utilization even with little/no clients connected: > USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND > root 9937 0.0 0.7 532004 7364 ? Ss Apr26 0:00 /usr/sbin/samba > root 9980 0.0 0.4 532004 4304 ? S Apr26 0:00

Hi List; Sorry for the OT post. However I suspect if anyone outside of RH can help with this question it would be this list. I'm starting a new contract with a shop that knows little about Linux and I'm helping pave the way. I've "inherited" an existing Linux install (RHEL4). I want to setup some tools but I find that yum is not installed. Is this normal for a RH box ? I

...Sergio Rizzi: > > By reading https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roadmap#Trust_support seems > > that trust support is not finished yet, btw in changelogs seems that in > > 4.2.* (with winbindd) interdomain trusts are now working. > > The release notes say that windindd "paves the way for support for > trusted domains in the AD DC". This does not sound like it is finished > now, more like one roadblock on the way to there has been removed. Correct. But it becomes closer each day that metze lands patches into master, so today it became that important bit cl...

On 2017-04-07 13:44, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: > In the end I just upgraded all DCs to 4.5 and remote-deleted the broken > ones. Seemed to work without a hitch, manual removal was only necessary > to remove the IPs from DNS\_msdcs.ourdomain\gc\. Apparently not, adding new DCs failed with "WERR_DS_DATABASE_ERROR". `samba-tool dbcheck --fix` solved that. With that out of

I am about to give an introduction to R to some clinical data managers used to SAS. There is already a lot of material in printed form and on the web that paves the way. What I haven't found so far are text wrapping capabilities in setting tables in raw text as in SAS PROC REPORT. At the moment i would direct them at producing HTML output from R and pipe the result through lynx. Coming from SAS they may not be prepared to walk the Unix way of choosin...

I originally brought this up in: https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/9067 Rails paved the way for Object#tap and Object#try...I''d like to propose Object#tap_if and its counterpart,Object#tap_unless. I''ve been following 37signals conventions of tapping variables in the views: <% account.owner.tap do |user| %> ... <% end %> But, I find myself having to do this

I've gotten roped into helping a local charity with some computing/infrastructure snafus. It seems their last good Samaritan installed Ubuntu all over the place and is "unavailable" now to clean up the mess. CentOS has made me somewhat lazy because everything just works out of the box for the most part and you've got the occasional "yum update". :) These are

On 03/03/2015 07:02 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 06:38:20PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: >> On 03/03/2015 05:16 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:15:06PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: >>>> On 03/03/2015 12:40 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>>>> Andrey, >>>>> >>>>>

On 03/03/2015 07:02 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 06:38:20PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: >> On 03/03/2015 05:16 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 04:15:06PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: >>>> On 03/03/2015 12:40 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>>>> Andrey, >>>>> >>>>>

Hello, I've started to do some research into the new 4G wireless standard, and there's one part of the standard that intrigues me. Apparently all data is packet based, including the phone calls. Every phone will have its own IPv6 address. This seems to pave the way for a call to go directly from a cell phone to a soft PBX like Asterisk. Is this possible under the 4G spec? If

Chandler Carruth wrote: >Alright, I'm ready to nuke it. Last chance to say stop. Stop. >For context of others, this has come up repeatedly: no one we know of is >using EdgeProfiling.cpp, PathProfiling.cpp, and the >lib/Analysis/Profile*Pass.cpp collection of tools. We've been actively using it since at least 2.8. True, we haven't been vocal about it. While I can see

On 20/05/2019 18:54, Hendrik Friedel wrote: > Hello, > >> Is btrfs becoming more common ? > In my impression: Yes. Also, this problem seems to affect also zfs and > thus all (?) file systems that support checksums and scrubbing in > linux; consequently all filesystems that are the choice of users who > need this for ensuring data consistency. Not from my experience, but,

Hi folks, I've recently replaced a RedHat EL 3.x system with a CentOS 5 system (fully yum'd as of Tuesday). This was a full-pave install, although we did copy the sendmail.mc from the original system. Now I get a lot of this in my logs: Dec 7 11:47:38 mail sendmail[20117]: lB7Gl6w0020116: timeout waiting for input from local during Draining Input The only thing even remotely

Le 30/11/2019 ? 21:50, John Pierce a ?crit?: > I strongly dislike moving removable disks between computers, > especially with differing operating systems. > > I would instead recommend getting/building a NAS aka file server and using > the network to share files, or make backups, or whatever. Hell is paved with good intentions (french saying). We already have OwnCloud running

> Il 04/07/2014 18:19, Marc Muehlfeld ha scritto: > It's on the "Roadmap" page > (https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roadmap#Trust_support). But no > timeline or planned version yet. By reading https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Roadmap#Trust_support seems that trust support is not finished yet, btw in changelogs seems that in 4.2.* (with winbindd) interdomain trusts are

> > – I noticed a typo in the server's `netbios name` setting, corrected > it, and restarted the DC Where did you change this, in smb.conf or /etc/hosts ?? By default netbios name is adapted from the hostname. If you changed the hostname you might have found the source of your problem. > > – Noticed I had problems with the LDAP SSL certificates for this node > and

In the end I just upgraded all DCs to 4.5 and remote-deleted the broken ones. Seemed to work without a hitch, manual removal was only necessary to remove the IPs from DNS\_msdcs.ourdomain\gc\. I'll try adding new DCs on a date that's not "Friday two hours before I disappear for vacation". On 2017-03-29 16:51, Sven Schwedas via samba wrote: > Situation: Trying to upgrade