search for: pavell

On Fri 2018-05-25 10:00:04, Thomas Garnier wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 2:14 AM Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz> wrote: > > > On Thu 2018-05-24 09:35:42, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:03 AM Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz> wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:03, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > > > >

On Thu 2018-05-24 09:35:42, Thomas Garnier wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:03 AM Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz> wrote: > > > On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:03, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > > Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for > the > > > kernel to be PIE compatible. > > > > > > Position Independent Executable

On Thu 2018-05-24 09:35:42, Thomas Garnier wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 4:03 AM Pavel Machek <pavel at ucw.cz> wrote: > > > On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:03, Thomas Garnier wrote: > > > Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for > the > > > kernel to be PIE compatible. > > > > > > Position Independent Executable

Ok, thank you, I will implement it then. As far as I see this optimization should be done in AArch64LoadStoreOptimizer, is it right? From: Eli Friedman [mailto:efriedma at quicinc.com] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 11:55 PM To: Kosov Pavel <kosov.pavel at huawei.com>; LLVM Dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] [ARM] Peephole optimization ( instructions tst +

hello! this is a question, how can i specify the random part in the GLMM-call (of the lme4 library) for compound matrices just in the the same way as they defined in the lme-Call (of the nlme library). For example i would just need random=list(my.Subject=pdBlocked(list(pdIdent(~... , ...),pdIdent(~... , ...)))) this specification , if i also attach library(nlme) , is not

hello! this is a question, how can i specify the random part in the GLMM-call (of the lme4 library) for compound matrices just in the the same way as they defined in the lme-Call (of the nlme library). For example i would just need random=list(my.Subject=pdBlocked(list(pdIdent(~... , ...),pdIdent(~... , ...)))) this specification , if i also attach library(nlme) , is not

Hi, Is there a way to execute next priority in the dialplan if you have called agi:async? I want to play warning message if adhearsion is down. Currently I wasn't able to make it work. The dialplan execution ends after the first priority. [incomming] exten => _X.,1,AGI(agi:async) exten => _X.,2,Answer exten => _X.,3,Playback(some-message) exten => _X.,4,Hangup Regards, Pavel

Hi Pavel, We (the Native Client team) are also interested in helping you get these reviewed and in, especially the x86 backend stuff. Native Client's x86-64 ABI is similar to x32 so we could probably share a good portion of the code if it's structured the right way. -Derek On 1404316081542, Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Pavel

Hi. I have a problem with the association methods which passed to a model through a belongs_to declaration. Here''s an illustration of the issue: GIVEN: # migration class CreateArticlesAndAuthorsTables < ActiveRecord::Migration   def self.up     create_table :articles do |t|       t.text     :title       t.integer :author_id     end     create_table :authors do |t|       t.text

Really? Me? Oh Pavel! I would be inestimably honoured. On 04/27/2012 01:55 AM, Pavel Ismailov wrote: > Hello! > > My name is Pavel Ismailov > and I`m CEO of www.flashphoner.com project. > > We noticed that you quite active in Asterisk-user > mail list, and would like to offer you buy signature > in your messages for some monthly price. > > Is it interested for

Hallo phorum, i have custom rest action. routes.rb: map.resources :schools, :collection => { :graduations => :get } SchoolsController: def graduations @schools = School.graduation(true) end link somewhere in navigation: <%= link_to ''Schools with graduation'', graduations_schools_path %> All works OK for me, but Rails needs (of course) a template for controller

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/temp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/temp.c index b9703c0..adb1deb 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/temp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/therm/temp.c @@ -120,6 +120,11 @@ nvkm_therm_sensor_event(struct nvkm_therm *therm, enum nvkm_therm_thrs thrs, struct work_struct *work; work =

Hi, according to discussion on asterisk IRC, where people said, that macros will be depracated, I tried to migrate from macros to contexts and Gosub but if I try to use gosub in extensions.ael, ael compiler complains, that I shouln't use Gosub app, but I can't find ael keyword, that will be Gosub equivalent, or can I ignore this ael warnings? thanks PJ LOG: lev:3 file:pval.c

Gandalf, SIGKILL (killall -9 glusterfsd) did not stop I/O after few minutes. SIGTERM on the other hand causes crash, but this time it is not read-only remount, but around 10 IOPS tops and 2 IOPS on average. -ps On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Diego Remolina <dijuremo at gmail.com> wrote: > I currently only have a Windows 2012 R2 server VM in testing on top of > the gluster storage,

On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:05, Thomas Garnier wrote: > Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for the > kernel to be PIE compatible. > > Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extended the > KASLR randomization range below the -2G memory limit. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie at google.com> Again, was this

On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:05, Thomas Garnier wrote: > Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for the > kernel to be PIE compatible. > > Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extended the > KASLR randomization range below the -2G memory limit. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie at google.com> Again, was this

On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:03, Thomas Garnier wrote: > Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for the > kernel to be PIE compatible. > > Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extended the > KASLR randomization range below the -2G memory limit. What testing did this get? > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S

On Wed 2018-05-23 12:54:03, Thomas Garnier wrote: > Change the assembly code to use only relative references of symbols for the > kernel to be PIE compatible. > > Position Independent Executable (PIE) support will allow to extended the > KASLR randomization range below the -2G memory limit. What testing did this get? > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/wakeup_64.S

Hi. I have successfully installed ovirt. Boot 2 nodex throught PXE boot, and added to pool. Whe i try to create NFS storage, they in state: pending setup. How to add NFS storage? taskomatic.log INFO Wed Sep 30 16:59:09 +0300 2009 (1991) starting task_refresh_pool INFO Wed Sep 30 16:59:09 +0300 2009 (1991) storage_find_suitable_host: host node3.ovirt.priv uuid 30303234-3144-3832-4638-3931FF

Hi, when mounting an intentionally corrupted btrfs filesystem i get the following warning and bug message. The image can be found here www.cccmz.de/~snakebyte/btrfs.2.img.bck.bz2 [ 297.406152] device fsid e14cf01de423381a-4bd40b603870018a <6>devid 2147483649 transid 9 /dev/loop0 [ 297.411937] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 297.412207] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:805