search for: patch1

...e kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.centos.plus will be erased ---> Package kernel-devel.x86_64 0:2.6.32-431.23.3.el6.centos.plus will be erased ---> Package mpich2.x86_64 0:1.2.1-2.3.el6 will be obsoleted --> Processing Dependency: libmpich.so.1.2()(64bit) for package: hdf5-mpich2-1.8.5.patch1-7.el6.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libmpichf90.so.1.2()(64bit) for package: hdf5-mpich2-1.8.5.patch1-7.el6.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: mpich2 for package: hdf5-mpich2-1.8.5.patch1-7.el6.x86_64 Package mpich2 is obsoleted by mpich, but obsoleting package does not provide for require...

...tly load it. But when I try to load my file: * require(hdf5) rm(list=ls()) ls() hdf5load("my_file.h5", verbosity=3) *I get this error message: * Errore in hdf5load("my_file.h5", verbosity = 1) : unable to open HDF file: my_file.h5 > HDF5-DIAG: Error detected in HDF5 (1.8.4-patch1) thread 0: #000: /Builds/unix/hdf5-1.8.4-patch1/src/H5F.c line 1514 in H5Fopen(): unable to open file major: File accessability minor: Unable to open file #001: /Builds/unix/hdf5-1.8.4-patch1/src/H5F.c line 1218 in H5F_open(): unable to open file major: File accessability minor...

I've loaded R-0.50-a1 but when I try to apply the patches it cannot find the files to apply patches to. [9] gilp/R0.50 : patch <R-0.50-a1.patch1 Looks like a new-style context diff. File to patch: [10] gilp/R0.50 : [10] gilp/R0.50 : [10] gilp/R0.50 : cd R-0.50-a1 [11] gilp/R0.50/R-0.50-a1 : ls CHANGES RESOURCES configure.mac* COPYING TASKS configure.win* COPYRIGHTS TASKS.OLD data/ INSTALL VERSION_DATE demos/ MIRROR-SITES b...

Known bug for 32-bit. Workaround is on the net. http://mulps.wordpress.com/2009/05/29/compiling-xen-kernel-2-6-29-2/ Boris ________________________________ From: Mehdi Sheikhalishahi <mehdi.alishahi@gmail.com> To: bderzhavets@yahoo.com Sent: Sun, January 3, 2010 4:25:00 PM Subject: Xenified linux kernel Hi Dear: I am refering to the

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24830 Summary: Some characters are not drawn well, missing vertical lines with NVIDIA NV18 Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> part 1: fixes >> >> part 2: new code >> >> Any comments? > > Applied cpu_part2.patch. Thanks! Thanks. I hope that this code will help to avoid "bug" reports such as http://sourceforge.net/p/flac/bugs/409/ (it seems that the author of this report compiled FLAC without --enable-sse option). OTOH, SSE support is

...;& "Ptr must have pointer type.") in llvm::StroreInst::init and llvm::LoadInst::init functions This is requared including llvm/Type.h or moving init function definitions to iMemory.cpp. I don't known more acceptable variant and then sending as attachment both versions: iMemory.patch1 and iMemory.patch2 . Vladimir -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: iMemory.patch2 Type: application/octet-stream Size: 2072 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20040701/3dba11c4/attachment.obj> --...

...sequence will teach llvm-mca how to use method > `resolveVariantSchedClass()` to resolve variant classes. llvm-mca will generate an error if the variant scheduling class cannot be resolved. > > Review https://reviews.llvm.org/D46697 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D46697> is the union of patch1 and patch2 only. > It is not meant to be reviewed at this stage, since it contains the code > changes related to patch1. > > The third patch is available here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46698 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D46698>. > D46698 requires patch1 and patch2. > > Bo...

I have some questions in terms of how to use puppet of configuration management for software patches. My previous approach was it to create a puppet module for each patch ... Like Patch1 includes (FileA, FileB, FileC), Patch2 includes (FileD, FileE)... So far so good and that works but now i have to create a Patch3 with lets say FileF and FileA included. As you can see there will be a puppet conflict as i can''t deploy the same files within different modules. What is th...

...thod resolveVariantSchedClass(). The last patch of the sequence will teach llvm-mca how to use method `resolveVariantSchedClass()` to resolve variant classes. llvm-mca will generate an error if the variant scheduling class cannot be resolved. Review https://reviews.llvm.org/D46697 is the union of patch1 and patch2 only. It is not meant to be reviewed at this stage, since it contains the code changes related to patch1. The third patch is available here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46698. D46698 requires patch1 and patch2. Bonus (optional) patches: 1) [X86] Teach scheduling models how to recognize...

Hi all, I am ricardo galli, I've juscribed just a couple of days ago. I wanted to stay as a lurker for a longer period, but this list has almost no traffic, so I wake up due to the silence. The point is, is this list related to icecast2 development? I made some changes to the server and sent a patch to Jack Moffitt, but I'm not sure he's still mainaining the server. If he

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23212 Summary: oops on rmmod nouveau with nv31m Product: xorg Version: git Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

...gards, -- ricardo galli gallir@uib.es http://m3d.uib.es/~gallir/ "I just stopped using Windows and now you tell me to use Mirrors?" - said Aunt Tillie, just before downloading 2.5.3 kernel. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: patch1.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 12896 bytes Desc: patch1.diff Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast-dev/attachments/20030117/00e3ce79/patch1.bin

...idea. In fact its probably even beter to reverse the logic so the enable-sse is the default which can be disabled with --disable-sse. > About part 1:does it have any problems? I can split it into several patches > (1 fix = 1 patch) or explain the changes in it in detail. I didn't apply patch1 because I mis-read your comment here: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2014-March/004582.html So, for the patches in this email: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2014-March/004577.html Should I apply patch2? Should I revert patch1 which has already been applied? Cheers...

Hi, Recently some security issues with bind have come up. NetBSD patched it's version of 9.3.0: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2005/01/27/0009.html Is the version in RELENG_5 not affected? (ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind/9.3.0/9.3.0-patch1) Bye, Mipam.

...ed down the gconf/option bug (gdb makes it clear that addScreenBinding is being called with really weird values sometimes) here's a patch though to fix a bug in adding/removing plugins that was crashing compiz -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: patch1.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 535 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/compiz/attachments/20060711/7588f893/patch1.bin

I''m currently working on moving storage services into their own domain and I''ve been looking at blktap2. I''ve been trying to get an image mounted with blktap2 and for some odd reason and tapdisk2 keeps hanging instead of quitting at the end. I haven''t removed any of the storage startup code at this point so everything should be as it normally is in xen-unstable.

...egards, --   ricardo galli   gallir@uib.es   http://m3d.uib.es/~gallir/ "I just stopped using Windows and now you tell me to use Mirrors?"     - said Aunt Tillie, just before downloading 2.5.3 kernel. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: patch1.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 9489 bytes Desc: patch1.diff Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast-dev/attachments/20020219/b99eab65/patch1.bin

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> About part 1:does it have any problems? I can split it into several patches >> (1 fix = 1 patch) or explain the changes in it in detail. > > I didn't apply patch1 because I mis-read your comment here: > > http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2014-March/004582.html > > So, for the patches in this email: > > http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2014-March/004577.html > > Should I apply patch2? > > Should I revert p...

A set of patches for R-0.50-a1 is now available as ftp://stat.auckland.ac.nz/pub/R/R-0.50-a1.patch1.gz The patches mainly fix problems reported since R-0.50-a1 but some older problems are also fixed. Here is the list of changes. Ross o Many subsetting and mutation problems with the new "expression" type have now been fixed. o When ask=T is set in par() the user is instructed...