search for: passses

Hi all, I first create a matrix/data frame called "d2" if another matrix accomplishes some restrictions "dacc2" da2<-da1[colSums(dacc2)>9,] da2<-da2[(da2[,13]=24),] write.csv(da2, file =paste('hggi', i,'.csv',sep = '')) The thing is if finally da2 cannot get/passs the filters, it cannot writte a csv because there is no any true condition.

The implementation of an float ordered <= looks buggy, but maybe I'm not reading the assembly right. This is lesf2vfp.S in compiler-rt, and it has this code: // extern int __lesf2vfp(float a, float b); // // Returns one iff a <= b and neither is NaN. // Uses Darwin calling convention where single precision arguments are passsed // like 32-bit ints //

Hi, I think I need to make a small change to the MCJit interface, and would like some feedback on what the most appropriate option would be. I'm working on LLILC (a jit for the CoreCLR built on MCJit, which creates one module for each MSIL method, containing the main function and zero or more EH handler functions extracted from the MSIL method). The CoreCLR requires the jit to notify it of

Hey Joseph, What Lang said made me wonder. Is it the right time for us (LLILC) to move to ORC? The long term plan was to go there but this could be our forcing function. -R From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Lang Hames Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 2:23 PM To: Joseph Tremoulet Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] MCJit interface

Hi Joseph, There are several reasons that a client might want to access the object before it's loaded, so a general API like #2 seems like the way to go. To support this in MCJIT you can add this to the event listener API. Orc clients can already do this by adding a custom object-file layer. - Lang. On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Joseph Tremoulet <jotrem at microsoft.com> wrote:

Larry, On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Larry Gritz <lg at larrygritz.com> wrote: > I have a whole slew of questions about optimization passes. Answers to any > or all would be extremely helpful: > > How important are doInitialization/doFinalization? Most of the passes do not use them. > I can't detect any difference if I use them or not. Say, if you are writing

On 8 April 2010 02:28, Rodolph Perfetta <rodolph.perfetta at arm.com> wrote: > movhi means mov if unsigned Higher > > movls means mov if unsigned Lower or Same > > > > so depending on the comparison result r0 holds 1 or 0 > Thanks. Now that I understand the assembly, I think there's another problem. libgcc's definition of lesf2 is actually

If a call comes into my Asterisk server on a DiD provided by an ITSP and the dialplan sends that call to another external number throught the same ITSP's network, I don't want the RTP packets to pass through my server once the call is bridged. I have had great success getting this to work using IAX, but I have not been able to get this to work with SIP. The call is bridged OK (media at

...ss object; looking at the code for 'opt' utility, it seems we need a PassInfo object, using which we create a new pass object. I tried the following code (which I wrote after looking at the code for bugpoint), but the list of passes seems to be empty: // Create a list of all the registered passses static cl::list<const PassInfo*, bool, PassNameParser> PassList(cl::desc("Passes available:"), cl::ZeroOrMore); mem2reg_pass = NULL; for(It i = PassList.begin(); i != PassList.end(); i++) { std::cout << (*i)->getPassName() << endl; if(string("mem2reg&quot...

Hi all, So I’m also working on LLILC. Specifically, I have been working on a JITEventListener to pass debug line info to the CoreCLR EE. With Joe’s change, I’ve lost the ability (or as far as I can tell) to attach an event listener. Is there a way within Orc to do the sorts of things that the JITEventListeners do in MCJIT? How would I go about adding a layer to add debugging support? Thanks,

Agreed, that sounds like the best plan. I'll look into moving LLILC to ORC. Thanks -Joseph From: Russell Hadley Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 8:13 PM To: Lang Hames; Joseph Tremoulet Cc: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] MCJit interface question Hey Joseph, What Lang said made me wonder. Is it the right time for us (LLILC) to move to ORC? The long term plan was to go there but

I have a case where I am abstracting the creation of models. After a fair bit of indirection, I eventually get around to making a .new call. I need to be able to pass params to that .new call. I know I can''t use def initialize() in an AR model (rather frustrating). So, I have found some references to after_initialize, but that doesn''t work either. I see several threads on

When we were using MCJIT, I could do this: // Attach the event listener Context.EE->RegisterJITEventListener( LLILCJitEventListener::createLLILCJitEventListener( new LLILCJitEventWrapper(&Context))); The event listeners listened for when an object is emitted (NotifyObjectEmitted), and that’s when we’d go through and extract debug info from the ObjectFile. Now, I imagine

Hello, I try to write parts of my code in C to accelerate the for-loops. But basic operations I want to do in R (e.g. start cluster). My R code looks something like this: library(Rmpi) mpi.spawn.Rslaves() mpi.remote.exec(....) dyn.load("test.so") erg <- .Call("test", ....) .... mpi.close.Rslaves() mpi.quit() And my C function looks something like this: #include

I have a whole slew of questions about optimization passes. Answers to any or all would be extremely helpful: How important are doInitialization/doFinalization? I can't detect any difference if I use them or not. Why does the function pass manager have doInitialization/doFinalization, but the global pass manager doesn't? If I am applying the function passes to many functions, do I

I have modified scaffolding code slightly to get three edit actions and three update actions. The requirement: to allow users to edit attributes for the same model from seperate forms instead of one form, while using the given scaffolding code and performing model validations. I am using restful_authentication with the login email password validations defined. class users_controller

Hello everybody! Obviously Samba as a PDC and Fileserver for w2k clients is not as easy as I first thought. Soon after setup and integration in a network a problem with the shares and MS Word appeared. Any time a file is opened with M$ Word directly from a share and edited it can't be saved. The M$ user gets the msg that the file is write-protected and on the samba side the file

caveat: I haven't either read actionscript language spec nor really got through swfdec context, frame and such. This is fully based on blocky.swf code inspection. thanks to flare, i can extract the below beautiful code. You don't need to understand the whole thing but there is one thing to notice: border[XY]start are initialized in on(press) and get used in on(release). Currently swfdec

I run large piece of code in JIT and it runs only marginallty faster with optimization levels 1,2,3. I think differences are within the margin or error. level user time 0 17339ms 1 16913ms 2 16891ms 3 16898ms Level is set with builder->setOptLevel(olev); Compilation time is excluded by taking the only top-level function address before the run

Hi all, After I converted my Linux desktop from Mandriva 2008.1 with Samba 3.0.28a to Ubuntu 9.04 with Samba 3.3.2, my Windows 98 box could no longer connect to my Linux desktop via Samba. The symptom was that Windows kept asking for the IPC$ password. Linux clients have no problem with the Ubuntu Samba server. My machine is called "mydesk", and on every Linux box in the house, the