search for: passs

...t create a matrix/data frame called "d2" if another matrix accomplishes some restrictions "dacc2" da2<-da1[colSums(dacc2)>9,] da2<-da2[(da2[,13]=24),] write.csv(da2, file =paste('hggi', i,'.csv',sep = '')) The thing is if finally da2 cannot get/passs the filters, it cannot writte a csv because there is no any true condition. How can I create anyway a csv with zeros of one row and "n" columns (being n the number of columns of da2? I need a loop? [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

...ered <= looks buggy, but maybe I'm not reading the assembly right. This is lesf2vfp.S in compiler-rt, and it has this code: // extern int __lesf2vfp(float a, float b); // // Returns one iff a <= b and neither is NaN. // Uses Darwin calling convention where single precision arguments are passsed // like 32-bit ints // DEFINE_COMPILERRT_FUNCTION(__lesf2vfp) fmsr s14, r0 // move from GPR 0 to float register fmsr s15, r1 // move from GPR 1 to float register fcmps s14, s15 fmstat movls r0, #1 // set result register to 1 if equal movhi r0, #0 bx lr If I read this right, t...

...ld.loadObject. Something like NotifyObjectPreLoaded. The LLILC-specific MemoryManager could use this hook to scan the object::ObjectFile and pass whatever it needs to the CoreCLR. This seems like a decent option to me, but I don't know if it would be considered a bad loss of encapsulation to passs out the object::ObjectFile in the state where it's been 'created' but not yet 'loaded'. 3. Similar to #2, the existing reserveAllocationSpace callback on MemoryManager could simply take an additional parameter which is the object::ObjectFile. This would be a more minimal...

...ld.loadObject. Something like NotifyObjectPreLoaded. The LLILC-specific MemoryManager could use this hook to scan the object::ObjectFile and pass whatever it needs to the CoreCLR. This seems like a decent option to me, but I don't know if it would be considered a bad loss of encapsulation to passs out the object::ObjectFile in the state where it's been 'created' but not yet 'loaded'. 3. Similar to #2, the existing reserveAllocationSpace callback on MemoryManager could simply take an additional parameter which is the object::ObjectFile. This would be a more minimal...

...thing like > NotifyObjectPreLoaded. The LLILC-specific MemoryManager could use this > hook to scan the object::ObjectFile and pass whatever it needs to the > CoreCLR. This seems like a decent option to me, but I don't know if it > would be considered a bad loss of encapsulation to passs out the > object::ObjectFile in the state where it's been 'created' but not yet > 'loaded'. > > 3. Similar to #2, the existing reserveAllocationSpace callback on > MemoryManager could simply take an additional parameter which is the > object::ObjectFile....

...unctionPass and it is designed to operate on one function at a time. If you want to prepare the stage or collect some information from the module (which contains all the functions) before you modify any function using your pass then you use doInitialization hook. This is useful because the function passs's runOnFunction only gives you access to the function and not the module surrounding the function. Typically, if your function pass MyFP is operating on a Module M1 with two functions F1 ad F2 in it then execution sequence will be MyFP->doInitialization(M1); MyFP->runOnFunction(F1)...

...bly right. This is lesf2vfp.S in compiler-rt, and it has > this code: > > > > > > // extern int __lesf2vfp(float a, float b); > > // > > // Returns one iff a <= b and neither is NaN. > > // Uses Darwin calling convention where single precision arguments are passsed > > // like 32-bit ints > > // > > DEFINE_COMPILERRT_FUNCTION(__lesf2vfp) > > fmsr s14, r0 // move from GPR 0 to float register > > fmsr s15, r1 // move from GPR 1 to float register > > fcmps s14, s15 > > fmstat...

...y Authentication required" just after the INVITE to the callee. Could that be part of the problem? If so what's the fix? I thought it had something to do with the "auth" parameter. I am: - Behind a NAT, - Running Red Hat 9.0 - Running Asterisk 1.2.14 How do I stop the media passsing through my Asterisk server after a call between two external parties has been bridged? My sip.conf and the dial command I use are below. Thanks, Hugh ;*********************** Dial Command ******************************* exten => _6136930630,n,Dial(SIP/6137451576@6135551234) ;*************...

...ss object; looking at the code for 'opt' utility, it seems we need a PassInfo object, using which we create a new pass object. I tried the following code (which I wrote after looking at the code for bugpoint), but the list of passes seems to be empty: // Create a list of all the registered passses static cl::list<const PassInfo*, bool, PassNameParser> PassList(cl::desc("Passes available:"), cl::ZeroOrMore); mem2reg_pass = NULL; for(It i = PassList.begin(); i != PassList.end(); i++) { std::cout << (*i)->getPassName() << endl; if(string("mem2reg&qu...

...ld.loadObject. Something like NotifyObjectPreLoaded. The LLILC-specific MemoryManager could use this hook to scan the object::ObjectFile and pass whatever it needs to the CoreCLR. This seems like a decent option to me, but I don't know if it would be considered a bad loss of encapsulation to passs out the object::ObjectFile in the state where it's been 'created' but not yet 'loaded'. 3. Similar to #2, the existing reserveAllocationSpace callback on MemoryManager could simply take an additional parameter which is the object::ObjectFile. This would be a more minimal...

...ld.loadObject. Something like NotifyObjectPreLoaded. The LLILC-specific MemoryManager could use this hook to scan the object::ObjectFile and pass whatever it needs to the CoreCLR. This seems like a decent option to me, but I don't know if it would be considered a bad loss of encapsulation to passs out the object::ObjectFile in the state where it's been 'created' but not yet 'loaded'. 3. Similar to #2, the existing reserveAllocationSpace callback on MemoryManager could simply take an additional parameter which is the object::ObjectFile. This would be a more minimal...

I have a case where I am abstracting the creation of models. After a fair bit of indirection, I eventually get around to making a .new call. I need to be able to pass params to that .new call. I know I can''t use def initialize() in an AR model (rather frustrating). So, I have found some references to after_initialize, but that doesn''t work either. I see several threads on

...ld.loadObject. Something like NotifyObjectPreLoaded. The LLILC-specific MemoryManager could use this hook to scan the object::ObjectFile and pass whatever it needs to the CoreCLR. This seems like a decent option to me, but I don't know if it would be considered a bad loss of encapsulation to passs out the object::ObjectFile in the state where it's been 'created' but not yet 'loaded'. 3. Similar to #2, the existing reserveAllocationSpace callback on MemoryManager could simply take an additional parameter which is the object::ObjectFile. This would be a more minimal...

Hello, I try to write parts of my code in C to accelerate the for-loops. But basic operations I want to do in R (e.g. start cluster). My R code looks something like this: library(Rmpi) mpi.spawn.Rslaves() mpi.remote.exec(....) dyn.load("test.so") erg <- .Call("test", ....) .... mpi.close.Rslaves() mpi.quit() And my C function looks something like this: #include

I have a whole slew of questions about optimization passes. Answers to any or all would be extremely helpful: How important are doInitialization/doFinalization? I can't detect any difference if I use them or not. Why does the function pass manager have doInitialization/doFinalization, but the global pass manager doesn't? If I am applying the function passes to many functions, do I

...gin email password validations defined. class users_controller edit_email edit_login edit_password update_email if update_attr save else render => edit_email update_login if update_attr save else render => edit_login update_password @curr_pass = params[:curr+passs] if update_attr save else render => edit_password end i have made routes edit_email_path edit_login_path edit_password_path update_email_path update_login_path update_password_path I can get the update_email and update_login to work if I avoid setting password validations on update. When i...

Hello everybody! Obviously Samba as a PDC and Fileserver for w2k clients is not as easy as I first thought. Soon after setup and integration in a network a problem with the shares and MS Word appeared. Any time a file is opened with M$ Word directly from a share and edited it can't be saved. The M$ user gets the msg that the file is write-protected and on the samba side the file

caveat: I haven't either read actionscript language spec nor really got through swfdec context, frame and such. This is fully based on blocky.swf code inspection. thanks to flare, i can extract the below beautiful code. You don't need to understand the whole thing but there is one thing to notice: border[XY]start are initialized in on(press) and get used in on(release). Currently swfdec

I run large piece of code in JIT and it runs only marginallty faster with optimization levels 1,2,3. I think differences are within the margin or error. level user time 0 17339ms 1 16913ms 2 16891ms 3 16898ms Level is set with builder->setOptLevel(olev); Compilation time is excluded by taking the only top-level function address before the run

...chine is called "mydesk", and on every Linux box in the house, the following did what they were supposed to: smbclient -NL mydesk smbclient //mydesk/tmp -Uslitt I opened ports 137, 138, 139 and 445 to both udp and tcp, no change on the Windows box. I set the firewall (temporarily) to passs all, no change on the Windows box. I installed Mandriva 2008.1 on an experimental machine, created a tiny Samba with a share for /tmp, and verified that the same Windows computer could browse the /tmp directory. I moved the smb.conf file from the mandriva 2008 box to the Ubuntu 9.04 box, chang...