Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "participiant".
Did you mean:
participant
2009 May 31
2
Problem with reshaping of data
...... 4
...
999; 0.9; 0.6; 0.3; 0.1; 4; ... 2
1000; 0.2; 0.6; 0.7; 0.8; 1; ... 5
ID is the number of persons (here 1000 persons)
x are descriptive variables
and v1-v20 are values of satisfaction on holidays for 20 days
and now i should reshape the data such that each record contains only one participiant on one day
could somebody help me? i don't know how to do this?!
thank you
_________________________________________________________________
[[elided Hotmail spam]]
[[elided Hotmail spam]]
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2004 Aug 06
3
Server based audio merge
There's no perfect solution to the multiple client problem. Each
approach has advantages and drawbacks:
1) Mixing at the server
- Allows a constant bandwidth for every client
- Allows compatibility with regular VoIP prones
- Requires transcoding, even when only on person is talking
- Higher bit-rate required for the general case (one speaker is talking)
2) Sending multiple streams
- Possible
2004 Aug 06
2
Server based audio merge
CELP based coders perform poorly when you mix streams. Perhaps, we need
a transform code or a subband code at somewhat higher rate 12-16 kbps
that will retain the quality after transcoding and mixing. Is the speex
ultra-wideband based on subband coding?
-Devendra Jalihal
<p>On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Ulrich B. Staudinger wrote:
> Hi,
> been silent in this discussion for quite long ...
2004 Aug 06
0
Server based audio merge
Hi,
been silent in this discussion for quite long ...
Am Fr, 2003-11-21 um 08.07 schrieb Jean-Marc Valin:
> There's no perfect solution to the multiple client problem. Each
> approach has advantages and drawbacks:
>
> 1) Mixing at the server
> - Allows a constant bandwidth for every client
> - Allows compatibility with regular VoIP prones
> - Requires transcoding, even
2004 Aug 06
0
Server based audio merge
Well, i don't know if we speak of the same ... The quality is ok, but
the encoding of a PCM frame on the tested machine took 2ms, which (if
the PCM frame is 7ms in length) means the machine can only encode three
streams in realtime ...
<p><p>Am Sa, 2003-11-22 um 03.30 schrieb Devendra Jalihal:
> CELP based coders perform poorly when you mix streams. Perhaps, we need
> a
2005 May 23
17
What is going on now?
Hi,
I read the news about Tom Steps quit. I use shorewall for some days now
and as many people I ike it very much. I asked Tom in a personal mail,
what could be done to continue the project and he told me I had to
subscribe to this list.
My ideas where:
a) Mirroring the site
b) I would like to study the code and help
c) I am studying computer science and I could ask some teachers and
friends