search for: participiant

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "participiant".

Did you mean: participant
2009 May 31
2
Problem with reshaping of data
...... 4 ... 999; 0.9; 0.6; 0.3; 0.1; 4; ... 2 1000; 0.2; 0.6; 0.7; 0.8; 1; ... 5 ID is the number of persons (here 1000 persons) x are descriptive variables and v1-v20 are values of satisfaction on holidays for 20 days and now i should reshape the data such that each record contains only one participiant on one day could somebody help me? i don't know how to do this?! thank you _________________________________________________________________ [[elided Hotmail spam]] [[elided Hotmail spam]] [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2004 Aug 06
3
Server based audio merge
There's no perfect solution to the multiple client problem. Each approach has advantages and drawbacks: 1) Mixing at the server - Allows a constant bandwidth for every client - Allows compatibility with regular VoIP prones - Requires transcoding, even when only on person is talking - Higher bit-rate required for the general case (one speaker is talking) 2) Sending multiple streams - Possible
2004 Aug 06
2
Server based audio merge
CELP based coders perform poorly when you mix streams. Perhaps, we need a transform code or a subband code at somewhat higher rate 12-16 kbps that will retain the quality after transcoding and mixing. Is the speex ultra-wideband based on subband coding? -Devendra Jalihal <p>On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Ulrich B. Staudinger wrote: > Hi, > been silent in this discussion for quite long ...
2004 Aug 06
0
Server based audio merge
Hi, been silent in this discussion for quite long ... Am Fr, 2003-11-21 um 08.07 schrieb Jean-Marc Valin: > There's no perfect solution to the multiple client problem. Each > approach has advantages and drawbacks: > > 1) Mixing at the server > - Allows a constant bandwidth for every client > - Allows compatibility with regular VoIP prones > - Requires transcoding, even
2004 Aug 06
0
Server based audio merge
Well, i don't know if we speak of the same ... The quality is ok, but the encoding of a PCM frame on the tested machine took 2ms, which (if the PCM frame is 7ms in length) means the machine can only encode three streams in realtime ... <p><p>Am Sa, 2003-11-22 um 03.30 schrieb Devendra Jalihal: > CELP based coders perform poorly when you mix streams. Perhaps, we need > a
2005 May 23
17
What is going on now?
Hi, I read the news about Tom Steps quit. I use shorewall for some days now and as many people I ike it very much. I asked Tom in a personal mail, what could be done to continue the project and he told me I had to subscribe to this list. My ideas where: a) Mirroring the site b) I would like to study the code and help c) I am studying computer science and I could ask some teachers and friends