search for: partcularly

Hey, I've been reading back the thread and there's a lot of ideas flying around, I may have missed more than I should, but here's my view on it. First, I think this is a good idea. Mapping caches is certainly interesting to general architectures, but particularly important to massive operations like matrix multiply and stencils can pull a lot of data into cache and sometimes thrash

Peter, Sorry to trouble you but I have a quick question concerning your pxelinux / syslinux program. I'm having trouble creating a partcular boot configuration. I'd be grateful of you could help.... Im looking for the folowing setup: Boot a machine, by default it boots from the network card. This using tftp drags your network boot program across and presents the boot prompt (as in

Can you also post information such as: Type of phone (model Number would be idela) How is it conencted, SIP, ZAP, IAX, Channel Bank. Corresponding config files would also help. Help us help you. >>-----Original Message----- >>From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com >>[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of >>Paul A Brown >>Sent:

On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 at 15:56, David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote: > The cache interfaces are flexible enough to allow passes to answer > questions like, "how much effective cache is available for this core > (thread, etc.)?" That's a critical question to reason about the > thrashing behavior you mentioned above. > > Knowing the cache line size is important

Okay, I'm going to ask the gajillion-dollar question... I've been doing syslinux for 11 years now. From a very limited scope it has since grown and is now a very advanced boot loader. Unfortunately, it's not clear to me anymore to what extent the work I'm doing is useful. I personally dislike grub because of its monolithic design, and because the grub people have

or "How do I know my copy of FreeBSD is the same as yours?" I have recently been meditating on the issue of validating X.509 root certificates. An obvious extension to that is validating FreeBSD itself. Under "The Cutting Edge", the handbook lists 3 methods of synchronising your personal copy of FreeBSD with the Project's copy: Anonymous CVS, CTM and CVSup. There are

Hey everybody, I''ve made some progress on wxruby-swig, and have some good news and some bad news. The good news is that the MSVC version finally can run all of the samples provided in CVS. I''m using the same solve-by-ignore solution to the GC problem that wxruby uses, so there is far less crashing goin'' on. Depending on the next few weeks, we might be able to