Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "parsetype".
Did you mean:
parse_type
2012 Jul 03
3
[LLVMdev] bug in tablegen?
Not sure what you mean.
I.OutOperandList == (outs CPU16Regs:$rx)
I.InOperandList == (ins CPU16Regs:$ry, CPU16Regs:$rz)
On 07/02/2012 09:26 PM, Sean Silva wrote:
> I think you're missing the template args for `FRRR16_ins` in the first
> argument. The switch in TGParser::ParseType() doesn't cover the case
> of types with template args though... which makes me wonder what is
> going on inside of TableGen to make `I.f` and `I.AsmString` valid...
>
> --Sean Silva
>
> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:07 PM, reed kotler<rkotler at mips.com> wrote:
>> I&...
2012 Jul 04
0
[LLVMdev] bug in tablegen?
...andList == (outs CPU16Regs:$rx)
>
> I.InOperandList == (ins CPU16Regs:$ry, CPU16Regs:$rz)
>
>
>
>
> On 07/02/2012 09:26 PM, Sean Silva wrote:
>>
>> I think you're missing the template args for `FRRR16_ins` in the first
>> argument. The switch in TGParser::ParseType() doesn't cover the case
>> of types with template args though... which makes me wonder what is
>> going on inside of TableGen to make `I.f` and `I.AsmString` valid...
>>
>> --Sean Silva
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:07 PM, reed kotler<rkotler at mips.com...
2012 Jul 03
0
[LLVMdev] bug in tablegen?
I think you're missing the template args for `FRRR16_ins` in the first
argument. The switch in TGParser::ParseType() doesn't cover the case
of types with template args though... which makes me wonder what is
going on inside of TableGen to make `I.f` and `I.AsmString` valid...
--Sean Silva
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:07 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote:
> I've filed the following bug....
2012 Jul 03
2
[LLVMdev] bug in tablegen?
I've filed the following bug. Maybe I'm doing something stupid here or
maybe someone knows of a workaround.
The following fragment from mips16 (not yet checked into main source).
The problem is that I should be able to pass parameters:
I.OutOperandList, I.InOperandList
But instead, I must back substitute what I know the values of these are.
(outs CPU16Regs:$rx), (ins CPU16Regs:$ry,
2012 Jul 05
2
[LLVMdev] bug in tablegen?
...:$rx)
>>
>> I.InOperandList == (ins CPU16Regs:$ry, CPU16Regs:$rz)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 07/02/2012 09:26 PM, Sean Silva wrote:
>>> I think you're missing the template args for `FRRR16_ins` in the first
>>> argument. The switch in TGParser::ParseType() doesn't cover the case
>>> of types with template args though... which makes me wonder what is
>>> going on inside of TableGen to make `I.f` and `I.AsmString` valid...
>>>
>>> --Sean Silva
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 8:07 PM, reed kotle...
2012 Jul 05
0
[LLVMdev] bug in tablegen?
...OperandList == (ins CPU16Regs:$ry, CPU16Regs:$rz)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07/02/2012 09:26 PM, Sean Silva wrote:
>>>> I think you're missing the template args for `FRRR16_ins` in the first
>>>> argument. The switch in TGParser::ParseType() doesn't cover the case
>>>> of types with template args though... which makes me wonder what is
>>>> going on inside of TableGen to make `I.f` and `I.AsmString` valid...
>>>>
>>>> --Sean Silva
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 2, 201...
2006 May 09
1
[LLVMdev] Memory leaks in LLVM
...nst*) ( Type.cpp:857)
==10132== by 0x84B6CC6:
llvm::PointerType::refineAbstractType(llvm::DerivedType const*, llvm::Type
const*) (Type.cpp:1395)
==10132== by 0x84B6A83:
llvm::DerivedType::refineAbstractTypeTo(llvm::Type const*) ( Type.cpp:1306)
==10132== by 0x83E1DDB:
llvm::BytecodeReader::ParseTypes(std::vector<llvm::PATypeHolder,
std::allocator<llvm::PATypeHolder> >&, unsigned) (Reader.cpp:1408)
==10132== by 0x83E5446: llvm::BytecodeReader::ParseGlobalTypes() (
Reader.cpp:1997)
==10132== by 0x83E67E9: llvm::BytecodeReader::ParseModule() (Reader.cpp
:2339)
==10132== b...