search for: parsec

..., dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions.  I >> will disable the tests by default on the initial merge and test >> thoroughly on Linux and MacOS before enabling them.  May I please commit >> my changes directly to test-suite? Awesome! Can we see a patch? The PARSEC webpage mentions that the benchmark suite is quite large. Does your patch actually commit a specific version to the test-suite, or is it setup like the externals tests where the user is expected to download PARSEC on the side if they wish to test it? > I'm not convinced that the PARSEC test...

...ial merge and test >>> thoroughly on Linux and MacOS before enabling them. May I please commit >>> my changes directly to test-suite? >>> > > Awesome! Can we see a patch? > Hi! I'm the person that asked Patrick to email llvmdev about integrating PARSEC. We needed to make PARSEC work with test-suite because we use test-suite as the foundation of our testing infrastructure, and since we've gone through the trouble to make it work, we might as well let others benefit from our effort. I advised Patrick to *not* send a patch because it would...

...>> thoroughly on Linux and MacOS before enabling them.  May I please commit >>>> my changes directly to test-suite? >>>> >> >> Awesome! Can we see a patch? >> > > Hi!  I'm the person that asked Patrick to email llvmdev about integrating > PARSEC.  We needed to make PARSEC work with test-suite because we use > test-suite as the foundation of our testing infrastructure, and since we've > gone through the trouble to make it work, we might as well let others > benefit from our effort. > > I advised Patrick to *not* send a pa...

From here: http://parsec.cs.princeton.edu It is open-source and redistributable, and I have added LICENSE.TXT files to all the pieces I want to merge. These are blackscholes, canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions. I will disable the tests by default on the initial merge and test thorou...

...y I please commit >>>>> my changes directly to test-suite? >>>>> >>>>> >>> Awesome! Can we see a patch? >>> >>> >> Hi! I'm the person that asked Patrick to email llvmdev about integrating >> PARSEC. We needed to make PARSEC work with test-suite because we use >> test-suite as the foundation of our testing infrastructure, and since we've >> gone through the trouble to make it work, we might as well let others >> benefit from our effort. >> >> I advised Patric...

...> canneal, dedup, fluidanimate, freqmine, streamcluster, and swaptions. I > will disable the tests by default on the initial merge and test > thoroughly on Linux and MacOS before enabling them. May I please commit > my changes directly to test-suite? I'm not convinced that the PARSEC tests are appropriate for addition the LLVM testsuite, because they are multithreaded tests. The testsuite needs to be low-volatility in terms of performance variation, as well as easy to verify correctness, and easy for the compiler developers to debug miscompilations. I don't think PARSEC...

I have completed work merging PARSEC into the LLVM test suite infrastructure? The patch is available at [http://zion.cs.uiuc.edu/~simmon12/parsec.patch]. If there are no objections, would someone please commit this patch to test-suite? Best regards, --Patrick

Has anyone ever used pool allocation on PARSEC? If not, has anyone ever compiled PARSEC to whole-program LLVM bytecode executables? If you have done either of these things, would you please email me your .bldconf files? Thanks, --Patrick

Would someone please merge this for me? --Patrick On 08/05/10 13:43, Patrick Alexander Simmons wrote: > I have completed work merging PARSEC into the LLVM test suite > infrastructure? The patch is available at > [http://zion.cs.uiuc.edu/~simmon12/parsec.patch]. If there are no > objections, would someone please commit this patch to test-suite? > > Best regards, > --Patrick > _______________________________________...

There was some talk a year ago about a patch that merges PARSEC into the test suite. Here is a link to the thread: http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2010-August/033877.html Has this just fallen through the cracks? Any help on this subject is welcome. Thanks! -- Wonsun -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:...

...s he'd be willing to make any fixes that are needed, if they are simple. --Vikram Professor, Computer Science University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign http://llvm.org/ http://llvm.cs.illinois.edu/~vadve On Aug 4, 2011, at 3:53 PM, Chad Rosier wrote: > Patrick, > Your patch to add PARSEC to the llvm test-suite recently came up as a topic on the LLVMDev mailing list. What is the current status of this work? I'm interested in helping. > > Regards, > Chad Rosier

...cripts or a large number of #defines or #includes that would indicate to me that this has been, at some point, ported to VMS. Can someone set me straight? Where is this code or is it already in some branch of the VCS ? Thanks in advance to all. Thanks, Swift -- Swift Griggs <sgriggs at parsec.com> Senior Consultant The PARSEC Group PARSEC Group is proud to be recognized through both the Colorado Department of Higher Education and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs as an authorized training organization and is now accepting GI Bill funding. Follow @PARSECgroup on Twitter F...

Hello, I'm testing the performance of Samba share when a windows client copy a directory that contains many small files (8-18KB). From the windows client during the transfer the speed goes up and down to 0KB/sec, so it's not stable. I have run the same test on a Windows server share (on the same hardware as the Samba share) and the transfer speed is stable, about 404KB/sec which is

Hello, I'm trying to add some tests from PARSEC to MultiSource, and I can't figure out how to disable the lli and cbe backends. Because the code uses inline assembly, only the llc backend works. Does anyone know how to do this? Thanks, --Patrick -- If I'm not here, I've gone out to find myself. If I get back before I return,...

...rt, hopefully others have decent suggestions there. However, another thing to consider is using a streaming archiver to transfer the files. Ie.. tar into a pipe over netcat works very quickly. That only works if you are doing a full send every time. Otherwise, see my first suggestion. -Swift PARSEC Group is proud to be recognized through both the Colorado Department of Higher Education and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs as an authorized training organization and is now accepting GI Bill funding. Follow @PARSECgroup on Twitter Find PARSEC Group on Facebook http://www.facebook.com...

I've recently played with the GCC implementation of pointer checker on a real hardware, my recent impressions are here: https://github.com/google/sanitizers/wiki/AddressSanitizerIntelMemoryProtectionExtensions (there is also some old pre-hardware content). In short, I totally agree with what David says above: MPX is a disaster. (Usual disclaimer: my opinion here is too biased) I am glad

...arc source ---------------------> .bc ------------------> .s -----------------> sparc executable. Is this correct? Or did you manage to build the llvm-gcc source on a sparc machine? Also, does your flow work correctly for programs with C++ constructs (take any standard benchmark...e.g. PARSEC's streamcluster.cpp as an example program)? The reason I am asking this is because I partly succeeded in building the llvm-gcc frontend on a SPARC machine..which works fine for C programs. However, programs which involve C++ constructs do not succeed. Although I am yet to figure out the reason,...

...mp;y=16&entry=entry160521-083131 Interesting. If someone else can do it, perhaps so can I. Problem is that I'm a dyed-in-the-wool Unix guy and I'm clumsy and slow in VMS, but that's okay. > All the best for your search! Thanks for your time and information, Andrew. -Swift PARSEC Group is proud to be recognized through both the Colorado Department of Higher Education and the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs as an authorized training organization and is now accepting GI Bill funding. Follow @PARSECgroup on Twitter Find PARSEC Group on Facebook http://www.facebook.com...

If you disable them at configure time, they won't be run. You probably want: --enable-targets=host --disable-jit Reid On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Patrick Simmons <simmon12 at illinois.edu> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to add some tests from PARSEC to MultiSource, and I can't > figure out how to disable the lli and cbe backends.  Because the code > uses inline assembly, only the llc backend works.  Does anyone know how > to do this? > > Thanks, > --Patrick > > -- > If I'm not here, I've gone out to find...

I've just released an early version of a Markdown implementation in Haskell (using the Parsec parser combinator library). pandoc converts Markdown to HTML, LaTeX, reStructuredText, rich text format, and S5 HTML slide shows. It partially converts HTML, LaTeX, and reStructuredText to Markdown. It also makes it easy to include LaTeX math on HTML pages, using Peter Jipsen's ASCIIMathML.j...