search for: parris

The vhost_scsi.ko code used several atomic variables at one point. Later they were dropped or converted to regular ints protected by a mutex. The commit that made these changes left an unused smp_mb__after_atomic() in vhost_scsi_set_endpoint(). It was previously used after incrementing vhost_scsi->vhost_ref_cnt but this field has been dropped: - atomic_inc(&vs->vhost_ref_cnt);

The vhost_scsi.ko code used several atomic variables at one point. Later they were dropped or converted to regular ints protected by a mutex. The commit that made these changes left an unused smp_mb__after_atomic() in vhost_scsi_set_endpoint(). It was previously used after incrementing vhost_scsi->vhost_ref_cnt but this field has been dropped: - atomic_inc(&vs->vhost_ref_cnt);

You described it well; I?m afraid that?s what it is. They want documents of an organization that doesn?t fit the description, and only then will they test it. That sounds great. I?ll reach out to Jeremy and see if he can help me get the IDs the USAF wants. It sounds like Joshua predates my time here. That?s a really good idea. Thanks very much! Doug From: Josiah Parry

At this point, vs_tpg is not public at all; tv_tpg_vhost_count is accessed under tpg->tv_tpg_mutex; tpg->vhost_scsi is accessed under vhost_scsi_mutex. Therefor there are no atomic operations involved at all here, just remove the barrier. Reported-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri at amarulasolutions.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini at redhat.com> ---

I found a plugin for dSPAM on this mailing list (http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.imap.dovecot/4632/focus=4632) that was very useful to me. I just modified the code to work for SpamAssassin instead. The purpose of this plugin is to watch the mail that is in the user's spam folder. If the user manually moves a piece of mail into the spam folder then the mail must have been spam that was

Hi, We recently made the switch to 1.9 for our large rails 2.3.14 project and ran into some strange behavior from the unicorns where encoding problem would cause blank 500 pages to be "randomly" served to users (we run ~10 x 5 unicorn workers behind our load balancer). We found that unicorn workers were dying when someone requested a url with utf-8 in it, and died in such a way that

Hello, I'm building a couple of mixed models using the lmer function. The actual modelling is going well, but doing some reading on the use of crossed random effects and the comparison of models with and without random effects it is clear that I need to generate some Markov Chain Monte Carlo samples. However, I'm struggling because everyone time I go to generate a sample I get the

...every google entry and searched this list to no avail, the only solution i found was a patch that would solve the problem if you were using an ldap backend. I am using a straight up tdbsam backend a fear this patch will not solve the problem. Does anyone know how to solve this problem? thanks Edd Parris .'' ` . Edward Parris : http://www.communecation.net/ : :' : Social Engineer : http://socialengineer.communecation.net/ `. `'` Debian Linux : http://www.debian.org : How Gnu are You? `- ___________________________________________________________ All new Yahoo! M...

Hey Doug, R is not a product that is provided by a company or any vendor that can be procured through a vendor e.g. something on a GSA schedule. Seems like you're caught in the bureaucracy hell hole. I used to help the USAF, and other DoD members use R when I was at RStudio (now Posit). I recommend you find someone in your organization who is doing Data Science. They'll likely have

Hello, over the last few days I've been attempting to compile openssh-3.4p1 on a HP j5000 (hpux 10.20) but have run into some problems. I had found the paper from Kevin Steves and have been following his suggested steps. Perl, zlib, prngd, tcp_wrappers and openssl all compiled more or less as he described. The configure script runs without protest but make gets hung up in

On 2019/4/16 ??6:47, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > The vhost_scsi.ko code used several atomic variables at one point. > Later they were dropped or converted to regular ints protected by a > mutex. > > The commit that made these changes left an unused smp_mb__after_atomic() > in vhost_scsi_set_endpoint(). It was previously used after incrementing > vhost_scsi->vhost_ref_cnt but

does an api (or a draft for one) exist for speex 1.1? are there a lot of important changes from 1.0.x to 1.1.x apart from the use of short int instead of floats? thanks lucas parry --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'speex-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the

On 10/13/24 19:30, Josiah Parry wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm new to contributing to r-devel. The trunk of r-devel right now includes > a `check_rust()` function for adherence to CRAN's evolving rust policy (see > commit > https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/commit/6114d4126434c056b476cbc5db2657536c153d9a > ). > > As it stands R 4.4.2 will codify CRAN policy on Rust as

I'm having a few issues with firewalld on a CentOS 7 install, in particular when using systemctl to start/check the status of the daemon: Checking the firewalld daemon status ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ # systemctl status firewalld firewalld.service - firewalld - dynamic firewall daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/firewalld.service; enabled) Active: failed

...h I > understand may be equivalent. So it is just something to be aware of. > > Best Regards, > > Stuart Marsden > > Tactical Communications Consultant > FinMars Consulting Ltd > UK: +441865589833 > Finland: +358453046287 > > > On 20 December 2013 17:20, Cliff Parris <cliff at espico.co.uk> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> What would be interesting would be a plot of complexity versus subjective >> or >> object audio quality. >> >> I've not had a chance to look at the new analysis code in 1.1 so maybe in >>...

...would be a plot of complexity versus subjective or object audio quality. I've not had a chance to look at the new analysis code in 1.1 so maybe in the case of a 6kbps compression you could clarify what decisions would it be making that would justify the extra complexity? Best Regards Cliff Parris -----Original Message----- From: opus-request at xiph.org Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2013 6:07 PM To: opus at xiph.org Subject: opus Digest, Vol 59, Issue 21 Send opus mailing list submissions to opus at xiph.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.xiph.org/...

...ess you compare old complexity 10 with new complexity 5 which I understand may be equivalent. So it is just something to be aware of. Best Regards, Stuart Marsden Tactical Communications Consultant FinMars Consulting Ltd UK: +441865589833 Finland: +358453046287 On 20 December 2013 17:20, Cliff Parris <cliff at espico.co.uk> wrote: > Hi All, > > What would be interesting would be a plot of complexity versus subjective > or > object audio quality. > > I've not had a chance to look at the new analysis code in 1.1 so maybe in > the case of a 6kbps compression you...

...h I understand may be equivalent. So it is just something to be aware of. > > Best Regards, > > Stuart Marsden > > Tactical Communications Consultant > FinMars Consulting Ltd > UK: +441865589833 > Finland: +358453046287 > > > On 20 December 2013 17:20, Cliff Parris <cliff at espico.co.uk> wrote: > Hi All, > > What would be interesting would be a plot of complexity versus subjective or > object audio quality. > > I've not had a chance to look at the new analysis code in 1.1 so maybe in > the case of a 6kbps compression you coul...

Hi all, I'm new to contributing to r-devel. The trunk of r-devel right now includes a `check_rust()` function for adherence to CRAN's evolving rust policy (see commit https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/commit/6114d4126434c056b476cbc5db2657536c153d9a ). As it stands R 4.4.2 will codify CRAN policy on Rust as the R language's policy and will have deep implications for the language moving

Dear R folk: Perhaps I'm just dense today, but I am having trouble reproducing the principal components plotted and summarized by clusplot. Here is a brief example using the pluton dataset. clusplot reports that the first two principal components explain 99.7% of the variability. But this is not what princomp is reporting. I would greatly appreciate any advice. With best regards, -- Tom