search for: paritcularly

On Wednesday 30 January 2008 02:02, Evan Cheng wrote: > AFAIK std::upper_bound() would not return end(), right? Yes, it can return end(). In fact that's exactly what I'm seeing. std::upper_bound is just binary search and returns where the element should be inserted to retain ordering. So for example, if my iterator range is over: 1 2 3 4 5 and I call std::upper_bound(begin(),

...od signature, what kind of variables the method takes? This is one instance where I miss static typing...if this were Java code I would''ve known in two seconds what the method expected. I''m honestly seeking your advice here...how do you keep the various different ways methods, paritcularly ActionView helpers, can be called straight? Compounding the problem (and confusing me) was this method further down in the call stack: ---- module ActionView::Helpers class InstanceTag def to_country_select_tag(priority_countries, options, html_options) html_options =...

Dear R Users; I have been using the space-time K-function analysis to detect the existence of clustering in both space and time. I wish to ask and know what the minimum number of cases should be for such analyses to be valid. I have data with 23 cases and don't know how careful i should be in the interpreting the results. Secondly, i wish to find out if there is any bond between the

AFAIK std::upper_bound() would not return end(), right? Evan On Jan 29, 2008, at 3:08 PM, David Greene wrote: > I just ran into a problem here. I'm in SimpleRegisterCoalescing at > the point > where EXTRACT_SUBREG coalescing updates live ranges of aliased > registers (around line 473 of SimpleRegisterCoalescing.cpp). > > There's a call to MergeValueInAsValue at line

Hrm, I see a bug here. Let's say the liverange in question is [13,20) and the interval it's being merged to is something like this: [1, 4), [10, 15) IP = std::upper_bound(IP, end(), Start); if (IP != begin() && IP[-1].end > Start) { if (IP->valno != LHSValNo) { ReplacedValNos.push_back(IP->valno); IP->valno = LHSValNo; //

I just ran into a problem here. I'm in SimpleRegisterCoalescing at the point where EXTRACT_SUBREG coalescing updates live ranges of aliased registers (around line 473 of SimpleRegisterCoalescing.cpp). There's a call to MergeValueInAsValue at line 50. MergeValueInAsValue has this code: void LiveInterval::MergeValueInAsValue(const LiveInterval &RHS,

Not directly Dovecot, but a configuration problem. We have a working set-up with Dovecot+Procmail+Sendmail, using POP-before-SMTP. We want to be able to offer email accounts to some local schools, using SquirrelMail (keeps their costs & maintenance down). The whole arrangement is working, but we don't want to have to have 300+ School children as users of our Red Hat Enterprise server,