search for: paricularly

Any expert suggestions most welcome , I am really stuck .. thnx -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Fr?n: Ashish Garg Skickat: to 2003-05-08 09:04 Till: Jair; John H Terpstra Kopia: samba@lists.samba.org ?mne: Samba Installation help for a domain HI Guys, I need some help regarding Samba Installation for a domain. My Windows 2000 clients connect to a paricular doamin. My Samba

hello, I wanna use some mathematics formula and to do this I tried several way in paricular using strsplit textconnection scan setdiff but I think that it's a lil hard the data frame that I'm working on is as follow > donCalcara2 Id_Cara Form_C 1 743

I am using htmlParse from XML library on a paricular website. Sometimes code fails, sometimes it works, most of the time id doesn't and i cannot see why. The file i am trying to parse is  http://www.londonstockexchange.com/exchange/prices-and-markets/international-markets/indices/home/sp-500.html?page=0 Sometimes the following code works n<-readHTMLTable(htmlParse(url)) But most of the

I have library in development with a function that works when called from the top level, but fails under R CMD check. The paricular line of failure is rsum <- rowSums(kmat>0) where kmat is a dsCMatrix object. I'm currently stumped and looking for some ideas. I've created a stripped down library "ktest" that has only 3 functions: pedigree.R to create a pedigree or

Hi, Thank you for you input! We tried that already. That, however, doesn't do the same thing. It is then simply a DFS server and not the "magical" msdfs proxy - yes the user can now click on a link to get to the desired spot, but the proxy function _automagically_ sends the user, when they access the msdfs share, to the netapp's readonly share without the extra click. And it

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Bruce Stephens <bruce.r.stephens at gmail.com> wrote: > Jochen Wilhelmy <j.wilhelmy-KvP5wT2u2U0 at public.gmane.org> writes: > > [...] > >> So my question: Is there a paricular reason why the standard stream >> interprets signed char and >> unsigned char as characters instead of numbers? > > That seems to me to be the

Hi, There''s something really bizarre in ZFS snaphot specs : "Uses no separate backing store." . Hum...if I want to mutualize one physical volume somewhere in my SAN as THE snaphots backing-store...it becomes impossible to do ! Really bad. Is there any chance to have a "backing-store-file" option in a future release ? In the same idea, it would be great to

Hey, thanks for the input! I am looking into that. It is however a bit complicated due to the authentication lines and share connect lines being only related due to proximity in the log. It would probably work for most of the instances, but it would not be 100% viable, meaning we would be getting compaints and questions from our user "I ain't got that share?! WTF!!" I was going to

Trying to set up UEFI Syslinux boot on an ArchLinux USB 4GB stick. - Host system: 64-bit Ubuntu 14.10 on 56 GB hard drive - Hardware: ASUS P8H77-I, Bios v1101, i7-3770 at 3.40 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 - ArchLinux Instructions followed: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Syslinux#UEFI_Systems > ? ? 2. UEFI Systems > 2.2 Installation - Arch syslinux v.6.03 196352 Oct 13 22:25 /usr/sbin/syslinux

This is a post I sent by mistake directly to Ady without a reply to all (i.e., to the thread "Fail to set up UEFI syslinux on ArchLinux USB Flash Drive") It should go between Ady's post of Sun Mar 15 13:23:26 PDT 2015 and Ady's post of Mon Mar 16 06:03:58 PDT 2015 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: alex lupu <alupu01 at gmail.com> Date: Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 7:07

Well, this doesn't fix the preexec issue, but you might scan through the samba logs finding connections to the RO share, identify that IP address there, track back to Hostname and/or user who authenticated to that share and the use that as the basis for the email address. On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Greg Enlow <grenlow at hk.mailbox.de> wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for you

@Alex, please next time use "Reply All" (instead of the simple "Reply") for the mailing list emails; that way the emails will get to the Syslinux Mailing List (instead of arriving to particular members). Now, to the matter in question... (snip) > > Just a minor detail (but it helps for understanding each other)... > > You probably mean "in UEFI

Thanks, but I am still having the same problem -- I made sure to reference the correct passwd file, but WinXP is still forcing me to logon as AGAMEMNON\Guest. Tim -----Original Message----- From: miles123@gmx.de [mailto:miles123@gmx.de] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2004 6:11 AM To: tbbooher@cox.net Subject: SOME Suggestions on [Samba] Can't the very basic stuff to work Hello Tim, I have read

On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 03:31:55PM +0200, Greg Enlow wrote: > Hi, > > The Server to which the msdfs is pointing is a netapp. Though we theoretically can access the shell on it then begin to mess around there, we would really like to avoid that. Warranty and such make it a bit of a legal issue. That is the reason we went with a separate instance in the first place and now wonder why the

Dear all, When I compared the performance of some application on both a Xen domU and a standard linux machine (where domU runs on a similar physical mahine), I notice the application runs faster on the domU than on the physical machine. Instrumenting the application code shows the application spends more time on popen() calls on domU than on the physical machine. I wonder if xenlinux does some

Hi, This is the Xen implementation for the paravirt_ops interface. The series is based on 2.6.22-rc1-mm1, and I think its ready to be cooked in -mm with a view to being merged in 2.6.23. The first part of the series is some small changes to the core kernel. Apart from the new code added in "Allocate and free vmalloc areas" (posted many times before), they are simply a few one-liners

Hi, This is the Xen implementation for the paravirt_ops interface. The series is based on 2.6.22-rc1-mm1, and I think its ready to be cooked in -mm with a view to being merged in 2.6.23. The first part of the series is some small changes to the core kernel. Apart from the new code added in "Allocate and free vmalloc areas" (posted many times before), they are simply a few one-liners

Hi, This is the Xen implementation for the paravirt_ops interface. The series is based on 2.6.22-rc1-mm1, and I think its ready to be cooked in -mm with a view to being merged in 2.6.23. The first part of the series is some small changes to the core kernel. Apart from the new code added in "Allocate and free vmalloc areas" (posted many times before), they are simply a few one-liners