search for: paranoids

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.13 Severity: normal The rule for SSH ignoring "Bad protocol version identification" assumes there are no single quotes inside the version string ('[^']'). I am however getting mails including those lines: Mar 25 22:57:04 Debian-60-squeeze-64-minimal sshd[12144]: Bad protocol version identification

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.8 Severity: wishlist HI, can you please create a rule/some rules for amavis(d-new). I get for every mail this mesage: May 25 19:55:40 data amavis[9603]: (09603-15) Passed CLEAN, [::1] [213.165.64.22] <xxx at yyy.zz> -> \ <aaa at localhost>, Message-ID: <20100525175015.29677page1 at mx002.bbb.ccc>, mail_id: MM7upJv6se1Z, \ Hits:

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.23 Severity: normal Hello, I have: # /bin/cat ignore.d.server/cron ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ crontab\[[0-9]+\]: \([[:alnum:]-]+\) LIST \([[:alnum:]-]+\)$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ crontab\[[0-9]+\]: \([[:alnum:]-]+\) REPLACE \([[:alnum:]-]+\)$ and: # /bin/cat ignore.d.paranoid/cron ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+

Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.3.13 Severity: normal Tags: patch After upgrading to debian squeeze I get several messages a day in the form of: Jul 2 15:05:15 hostname spamd[21286]: spamd: handled cleanup of child pid [28609] due to SIGCHLD: exit 0 This is due to an update in spamd, that makes the message more detailed (includes exit code)[1]. Therefore messages including exit code 0

Hello, I was bored this weekend so I hacked up online dedup for Btrfs. It''s working quite well so I think it can be more widely tested. There are two ways to use it 1) Compatible mode - this is a bit slower but will handle being used by older kernels. We use the csum tree to find duplicate blocks. Since it is relatively easy to have crc32c collisions this also involves reading the

Hello, I am using acts as paranoid which works great. But I have the following problem. I have table a which has a has_many :tableb, :dependent => false relationship with table b. If I delete something in a and then try to edit a field in table b I get an error because it says the data does not exist so it doesn''t allow the update. I understand of course why this happens but I

On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > >> >> Yes, /etc/shadow would have always been readable only by root by >> default. The interesting question here is whether an intruder did >> it, clumsily leaving evidence behind, or whether it is just a local >> change from following some bad advice about things that

Guys, I am trying to figure out what exactly does this line do at the end of "acts_as_paranoid" plugin? ActiveRecord::Base.send :include, Caboose::Acts::Paranoid::ActiveRecord My problem: I have some classes that I use acts_as_paranoid, and others with tagging support. Classes declared as taggable, throw error, which appears to be in the acts_as_paranoid version of the

Hi All, I want to know thoughts on if I am being to paranoid/security conscious. CentOS 5.6, Apache, MySQL, running an Firewall in front of everything and obviously the built-in firewall on the box. I have ssh on a different port and starting to use Keys instead of password authentication. I host an intensive website and I am getting about 150 unique visitors per day. What I am seeing is

By default, sendmail only listens on the localloop: DAEMON_OPTIONS(`Port=smtp,Addr=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA')dnl But by default to allow sendmail to even work the iptables entry is: -A RH-Firewall-1-INPUT -m state --state NEW -m tcp -p tcp --dport 25 -j ACCEPT Without this, sendmail can't even connect to localloop. But should I handedit this line to something like: -A

Hi I couldn''t figure out, how to create a drop-down list with Markaby. How would I create something like this: <select name="character"> <option value="marvin">Marvin the paranoid Android</option> <option value="arthur">Arthur Dent</option> <option value="zaphod">Zaphod

The attached patch provides an additional check for the checksumming mode to ensure that a file that is actually written out to disk can be read back and has the same MD4 sum as the file on at the originating location. Regards, Nick. -------------- next part -------------- *** rsync-2.6.6pre1/receiver.c 2005-04-14 02:42:13.000000000 +0100 --- rsync-new/receiver.c 2005-07-26

I wish to sync a bunch of flac files that reside in various subfolders to the root of a folder on a destination. An example of the directory structure on the source is: source> tree Music/ Music/ ??? R ? ??? Radiohead ? ? ??? OK Computer ? ? ??? 01 - Radiohead - Airbag.flac ? ? ??? 02 - Radiohead - Paranoid Android.flac ? ??? Red Hot Chilli Peppers ? ??? Greatest

Anyone wanting their AAC/HE-AAC/aacPlus stream(s) listed on Tuner2, please send request(s) with relevant information to me directly. This is free and does not require an Orban Opticodec-PC Encoder. This will also help lighten the load for Xiph. -greg. ORBAN. At 01:45 2006-06-19, Michael Smith wrote: >On 6/19/06, paranoid <paranoid@dds.nl> wrote: > >>To me, that would not be

Hello, I am working on a backup script using rsync and have a question. Rather than doing a single rsync of /home/ I have set my script up to loop over /etc/passwd and do a seperate rsync of each user home dir (/home/user1, /home/user2) etc. In the end, I should have the exact same backup either way. However I feel safest doing it as multiple rsyncs (one for each user). I am doing this

I am interested in opinions regarding the use of xinetd versus the use of tcp wrappers. The two programs have similar functionality, but I find xinetd suits my needs better. The biggest problem is the age of xinetd, and AFAIK it is no longer being kept up. Are there any known security issues with xinetd? Another issue is that xinetd makes use of a non-standard inetd.conf layout, but

Can anyone recommend a commercial off site remote backup service with a client (preferably FOSS) for CentOS 5, preferably that allows encryption of the data being backed up? Small scale, I'm primarily looking to just back up my mail folder on my server. I've been backing it up to local hd via rsync but that drive just died, I'd prefer to have it backed up to somewhere more stable

This zfs looks great! I really hope this gets put into solaris soon since I don''t think I could live with Solaris express on a production machine. The easy of adding disk and moving directories looks like a life saver, especially for me who deals with trying to store digital media which piles up a couple of gig a day! This message posted from opensolaris.org

On Mon, 19 Jun 2006, Dennis Heerema wrote: > The nice thing of dir.xiph.org [http://dir.xiph.org/] was the fact that it > supported more or less all formats, this way we were able to send out > different formats, where the listener was able to choose his appriciated > format from and listen to it, also the way it all got listed made it very > easy for a listener to see all te

Redhat in centos? I type help and the first line says redhat. Are we paranoid about red..t? Clayton You can tell the caliber of a man by his gun--c. kirkwood