search for: pan0

...; ovirtbr0 active yes > > [root at localhost network-scripts]# sudo create-ovirt-network > Currently active bridges: > ------------------------- > bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces > ovirtbr0 8000.000000000000 no > pan0 8000.000000000000 no > virbr0 8000.000000000000 yes > > Currently defined libvirt networks: > ----------------------------------- > Name State Autostart > ----------------------------------------- > default ac...

...0) (dom0-cpus 0) (vncpasswd '''') So, I ''ve got this interfaces showing up. Vif x.x should appear after xm create Virtual-guest.cfg, I guess (which in my case is MArie-DHCP) root@debian:/home/dorian# brctl show bridge name    bridge id        STP enabled    interfaces pan0        8000.000000000000    no        xenbr0        8000.002655c46159    no        eth0 Now, when I try to boot my DomU guest here is the error, which many research on the web didn''t show up thje solution. however: Step 1: root@debian:/dev# xm create Marie-DHCP.cfg Using config file &quo...

Has anyone got a Bluetooth PAN up and running? PAN::= Personal Area Network -> TCP/IP over bluetooth. If so how did you configure it? Like getting a ifcfg-pan0 or some such configured.

...      collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000           RX bytes:8619142 (8.2 MiB)  TX bytes:16630155 (15.8 MiB)           Interrupt:16 Memory:d6000000-d6012700 [root@Server1-FC11 init.d]# brctl show bridge name    bridge id        STP enabled    interfaces eth0        8000.001e4f3a72b1    yes        peth0 pan0        8000.000000000000    no        Now I want to install paravirt xen guests. PFA, a screen shot of virt-manager status while creating a VM. But the paravirt option is disabled and i am unable to select  it. Why is that so? It shows that error and failed to install VM. How can i install a para...

Next question:- eth0            8000.001c2596e32b       no              peth0 pan0            8000.000000000000       no virbr0          8000.000000000000       yes Presence virbr0 in report seems strange. Direct port  Xen 3.4.2  to F11 doesn''t install daemon libvirtd ( bridge virbr0 ) , unless you wrote xen-3.4.2-(x).fc12.src.rpm  yourself. So , from where bridge vi...

...thernet HWaddr 00:06:7b:09:b9:4d inet6 addr: fe80::206:7bff:fe09:b94d/64 Scope:Link .. brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.00067b09b94d no eth0 eth1 pan0 8000.000000000000 no Thanks Alessandro ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security easier or more d...

On 02/14/2012 11:01 AM, Jun Koi wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:47 PM, Alex Jia <ajia at redhat.com> wrote: >> Hi Jun, >> I assume you haven't changed libvirt default URI, it may be a issue, >> I want to know whether it works for you if you explicitly specify >> --connect qemu:///system with virt-install? I think a root reason >> probably is your disk

Hi All, I am new to xen community. I am trying to setup Xen3.4.2 +FC11 Dom0 environs for lennovo T400. I have installed all prerequisite component for running xen and booted it. while I am trying to create DomU I am getting following error. I tried doing googling but none of suggested solution is working for me. Please guide me through my first experience with xen.for more details please see

...lib80211_crypt_tkip???? 9470? 0 wl?????????????????? 4176734? 0 cfg80211????????????? 619515? 0 lib80211??????????????? 5127? 2 lib80211_crypt_tkip,wl vfat?????????????????? 10584? 1 [root at localhost hybrid_wl]# iwconfig lo??????? no wireless extensions. p1p1????? no wireless extensions. pan0????? no wireless extensions. eth0????? IEEE 802.11? ESSID:""? Nickname:"" ????????? Mode:Managed? Frequency:2.462 GHz? Access Point: Not-Associated?? ????????? Bit Rate:72 Mb/s?? Tx-Power:24 dBm?? ????????? Retry min limit:7?? RTS thr:off?? Fragment thr:off ????????? Encrypti...

...see below, I have highlighted few details in bold color just for better & quick visibility. I feel this is issue with 3.4.2. [root@localhost rules.d]# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces eth0 8000.001c2596e32b no peth0 pan0 8000.000000000000 no virbr0 8000.000000000000 yes [root@localhost xen]# cat test|grep -i vif vif = [ ''type=ioemu, bridge=eth0'' ] root@localhost xen]# xm create test Using config file "./test". Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connec...

...see below, I have highlighted few details in bold color just for better & quick visibility. I feel this is issue with 3.4.2. [root@localhost rules.d]# brctl show bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces eth0 8000.001c2596e32b no peth0 pan0 8000.000000000000 no virbr0 8000.000000000000 yes [root@localhost xen]# cat test|grep -i vif vif = [ ''type=ioemu, bridge=eth0'' ] root@localhost xen]# xm create test Using config file "./test". Error: Device 0 (vif) could not be connec...

...istered May 20 19:31:17 wildfire xinetd[2450]: xinetd Version 2.3.14 started with libwrap loadavg labeled-networking options compiled in. May 20 19:31:17 wildfire xinetd[2450]: Started working: 0 available services May 20 19:31:17 wildfire NetworkManager[2188]: <warn> /sys/devices/virtual/net/pan0: couldn't determine device driver; ignoring... May 20 19:31:18 wildfire abrtd: Init complete, entering main loop May 20 19:31:18 wildfire abrtd: Directory 'oops-2012-05-20-19:31:18-2583-0' creation detected May 20 19:31:18 wildfire abrt-dump-oops: Reported 1 kernel oopses to Abrt May 20...

Anyone can help me with this problem I''ve described here: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612006 I''ve had XEN4.0 working on CentOS 5.4 platform without these problems.  I''m trying to do the same now with a newer laptop and CentOS didn''t recognise half hte drivers.  The latest opensuse 11.3 does have these drivers and specifically nouveau

Now that x86-64 has directly accessible percpu variables, it can also implement the direct versions of these operations, which operate on a vcpu_info structure directly embedded in the percpu area. In fact, the 64-bit versions are more or less identical, and so can be shared. The only two differences are: 1. xen_restore_fl_direct takes its argument in eax on 32-bit, and rdi on 64-bit.