search for: pacthes

hello is there any one who lnow what is the signification of ''@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@'' in the patch file htb2-2.4.17.diff thanks ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com

FAT doesn't support file ownership, so show warning instead of error. Fixes RHBZ#1196101 Maros Zatko (1): customize: fix --upload to FAT partition (RHBZ#1196101) customize/customize_run.ml | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 1.9.3

FAT doesn't support file ownership, so show info instead of error. --- customize/customize_run.ml | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/customize/customize_run.ml b/customize/customize_run.ml index dbb77df..40d19ac 100644 --- a/customize/customize_run.ml +++ b/customize/customize_run.ml @@ -289,8 +289,20 @@ exec >>%s 2>&1 let

What was wrong with detecting ENOTSUP and turning it into a warning then? For reference see: https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/blob/master/sparsify/in_place.ml#L38-L46 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program

hi everyone I have dovecot 1.0.rc15-2, postfix 2.3.8 and virtual users and domains installed in debian sarge, the users quota are not working. I have applied the pacth VDA and didn't work, if a I sent a mail to another user which exceeds his quota this user can receive the mail without problem, this said to me that the quota doesn't work. I use maildir in mi configuration. Please help

On 2018?09?28? 01:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 08:22:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> The access of vsock is not protected by vhost_vsock_lock. This may >> lead to use after free since vhost_vsock_dev_release() may free the >> pointer at the same time. >> >> Fix this by holding the lock during the access. >> >>

On 2018?09?28? 01:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 08:22:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> The access of vsock is not protected by vhost_vsock_lock. This may >> lead to use after free since vhost_vsock_dev_release() may free the >> pointer at the same time. >> >> Fix this by holding the lock during the access. >> >>

Hello! New version of R has came out and I would like to thank to all developers on this matter. So I should probably upgrade. Fine and no problem. For windows I just grab the latest precompiled binnaries and install them. Then I see a report on a bug, which is or will be fixed in pacthed version. So I need to get binnaries from patched build and install them, right? How often do you people

Hello! New version of R has came out and I would like to thank to all developers on this matter. So I should probably upgrade. Fine and no problem. For windows I just grab the latest precompiled binnaries and install them. Then I see a report on a bug, which is or will be fixed in pacthed version. So I need to get binnaries from patched build and install them, right? How often do you people

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Linus, > Just making sure nothing's wrong with this pull request. > If there's an issue, pls let me know! It was just pulled because I wasn't 100% sure I wanted the extra indirection. Oh well, pulled now. One question: - the arch/sh/ part of the pacth looks dubious. Why does it do

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Linus, > Just making sure nothing's wrong with this pull request. > If there's an issue, pls let me know! It was just pulled because I wasn't 100% sure I wanted the extra indirection. Oh well, pulled now. One question: - the arch/sh/ part of the pacth looks dubious. Why does it do

The following patch is just a cleaned up version from http://research.vovoid.com/smbssh/ which also includes a nice explanation of what the patch is trying to achieve. Full credits should go to them for this pacth, I have simply got it wokring on 3.6.1p2 and I am submitting it here to see if people believe it should be included in the general distribution. Cheers, Mark. -------------- next

Hi all, The R version 2.14.0 Pacthed build from today, including patches up to 2011-11-20, is showing the following when started up : R version 2.14.0 Patched (2006-00-00 r00000) ... Isn't something missing here, like a correct date and a release number? On the page http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/rpatched.html the release number is r00000 as well. Cheers Joris -- Joris Meys

Hi all! I saw TODO comment in nv50_vbo.c and decided to look at similar file, nvc0_vbo.c. I copied those two lines into nv50 with slight name change (nvc0->nv50) and apparently it doesn't fix any OpenGL app I have, but does not broke them further (I have compute pacthes currently applied, so some breakage expected). diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_vbo.c b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_vbo.c index 8d1c8c7665b..29b63a525aa 100644 --- a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_vbo.c +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_vbo.c @@ -189,8...

Hello! Does R core find the following pacth usefull - I created methods for levels for list and data.frame, which can be usefull to get a list of levels for entries in a list or columns in a data.frame. Patch is attached and shown bellow example # Example > tmp <- list() > tmp$a <- factor(letters[1:10]) > tmp$b <- factor(letters[5:14]) > tmp$c <- 1:10 > tmp1 <-

Moin, attached is a patch, which adds a new configuration option "PreferAskpass" to the ssh config. ssh{,-add,-keygen,-agent} will use ssh-askpass to prompt for passwords, if this option is set to "yes", and if ssh-askpass is available. Default for "PreferAskpass" is "no". Pacth is against current CVS. Sebastian -- signature intentionally left blank.

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 6:58 PM, David Newall <openssh at davidnewall.com> wrote: > I remember, when Sun first released NFS they used UDP for transport because > "performance", and then, not so very long later, had to implement TCP > transport because "reliability". network reliability has changed quite a bit since the 80's. see eg QUIC

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 07:37:37AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?09?28? 01:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 08:22:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > The access of vsock is not protected by vhost_vsock_lock. This may > > > lead to use after free since vhost_vsock_dev_release() may free the > > > pointer at the same time.

...n of attack on Samba server > (as attacker knows the operating system and version of the server)? surely, and sadly most of the stuff was diesgned with no awareness of that fact - you can't supress the version in ssh because it#s part of the proctol, the sme for mysql and httpd even refuses pacthes where you simply can remove the sevrer header because no client needs to know what type of webserver there is running at all in other world: most developers don't care otherwise this would not exist or at least not leak exact versions

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566 Summary: Snapshot does not contain any file Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic-ng Platform: All URL: http://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/patch-o-matic-ng/snapshot/ OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: