search for: pacthed

hello is there any one who lnow what is the signification of ''@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@'' in the patch file htb2-2.4.17.diff thanks ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com

FAT doesn't support file ownership, so show warning instead of error. Fixes RHBZ#1196101 Maros Zatko (1): customize: fix --upload to FAT partition (RHBZ#1196101) customize/customize_run.ml | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 1.9.3

FAT doesn't support file ownership, so show info instead of error. --- customize/customize_run.ml | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/customize/customize_run.ml b/customize/customize_run.ml index dbb77df..40d19ac 100644 --- a/customize/customize_run.ml +++ b/customize/customize_run.ml @@ -289,8 +289,20 @@ exec >>%s 2>&1 let

What was wrong with detecting ENOTSUP and turning it into a warning then? For reference see: https://github.com/libguestfs/libguestfs/blob/master/sparsify/in_place.ml#L38-L46 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program

hi everyone I have dovecot 1.0.rc15-2, postfix 2.3.8 and virtual users and domains installed in debian sarge, the users quota are not working. I have applied the pacth VDA and didn't work, if a I sent a mail to another user which exceeds his quota this user can receive the mail without problem, this said to me that the quota doesn't work. I use maildir in mi configuration. Please help

On 2018?09?28? 01:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 08:22:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> The access of vsock is not protected by vhost_vsock_lock. This may >> lead to use after free since vhost_vsock_dev_release() may free the >> pointer at the same time. >> >> Fix this by holding the lock during the access. >> >>

On 2018?09?28? 01:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 08:22:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: >> The access of vsock is not protected by vhost_vsock_lock. This may >> lead to use after free since vhost_vsock_dev_release() may free the >> pointer at the same time. >> >> Fix this by holding the lock during the access. >> >>

Hello! New version of R has came out and I would like to thank to all developers on this matter. So I should probably upgrade. Fine and no problem. For windows I just grab the latest precompiled binnaries and install them. Then I see a report on a bug, which is or will be fixed in pacthed version. So I need to get binnaries from patched build and install them, right? How often do you people upgrade R on windows? For every patch? I know that it depends on the bug, but I would just like to hear what are your habits. I suppose Debian packages of "base R" are updated accordi...

Hello! New version of R has came out and I would like to thank to all developers on this matter. So I should probably upgrade. Fine and no problem. For windows I just grab the latest precompiled binnaries and install them. Then I see a report on a bug, which is or will be fixed in pacthed version. So I need to get binnaries from patched build and install them, right? How often do you people upgrade R on windows? For every patch? I know that it depends on the bug, but I would just like to hear what are your habits. I suppose Debian packages of "base R" are updated accordi...

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Linus, > Just making sure nothing's wrong with this pull request. > If there's an issue, pls let me know! It was just pulled because I wasn't 100% sure I wanted the extra indirection. Oh well, pulled now. One question: - the arch/sh/ part of the pacth looks dubious. Why does it do

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Linus, > Just making sure nothing's wrong with this pull request. > If there's an issue, pls let me know! It was just pulled because I wasn't 100% sure I wanted the extra indirection. Oh well, pulled now. One question: - the arch/sh/ part of the pacth looks dubious. Why does it do

The following patch is just a cleaned up version from http://research.vovoid.com/smbssh/ which also includes a nice explanation of what the patch is trying to achieve. Full credits should go to them for this pacth, I have simply got it wokring on 3.6.1p2 and I am submitting it here to see if people believe it should be included in the general distribution. Cheers, Mark. -------------- next

Hi all, The R version 2.14.0 Pacthed build from today, including patches up to 2011-11-20, is showing the following when started up : R version 2.14.0 Patched (2006-00-00 r00000) ... Isn't something missing here, like a correct date and a release number? On the page http://cran.r-project.org/bin/windows/base/rpatched.html the rel...

Hi all! I saw TODO comment in nv50_vbo.c and decided to look at similar file, nvc0_vbo.c. I copied those two lines into nv50 with slight name change (nvc0->nv50) and apparently it doesn't fix any OpenGL app I have, but does not broke them further (I have compute pacthes currently applied, so some breakage expected). diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_vbo.c

Hello! Does R core find the following pacth usefull - I created methods for levels for list and data.frame, which can be usefull to get a list of levels for entries in a list or columns in a data.frame. Patch is attached and shown bellow example # Example > tmp <- list() > tmp$a <- factor(letters[1:10]) > tmp$b <- factor(letters[5:14]) > tmp$c <- 1:10 > tmp1 <-

Moin, attached is a patch, which adds a new configuration option "PreferAskpass" to the ssh config. ssh{,-add,-keygen,-agent} will use ssh-askpass to prompt for passwords, if this option is set to "yes", and if ssh-askpass is available. Default for "PreferAskpass" is "no". Pacth is against current CVS. Sebastian -- signature intentionally left blank.

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 6:58 PM, David Newall <openssh at davidnewall.com> wrote: > I remember, when Sun first released NFS they used UDP for transport because > "performance", and then, not so very long later, had to implement TCP > transport because "reliability". network reliability has changed quite a bit since the 80's. see eg QUIC

On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 07:37:37AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > On 2018?09?28? 01:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 08:22:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > > The access of vsock is not protected by vhost_vsock_lock. This may > > > lead to use after free since vhost_vsock_dev_release() may free the > > > pointer at the same time.

Am 26.12.18 um 17:28 schrieb Dmitry Katsubo via samba: > On 2018-12-26 17:10, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Windows 6.1] Server=[Samba 4.2.14-Debian] >> >> Comes from the servers Samba version, you cannot change this. >> >> The 'server string' parameter controls what is shown in browse lists >> etc. This can be changed, but

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=566 Summary: Snapshot does not contain any file Product: netfilter/iptables Version: patch-o-matic-ng Platform: All URL: http://ftp.netfilter.org/pub/patch-o-matic-ng/snapshot/ OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P1 Component: