Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "packsswb".
Did you mean:
packssdw
2009 Jun 09
3
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Fix SSE2 packing intrinsics return type
Hi all,
Please consider committing the attached patch. I believe the SSE2 packsswb,
packssdw and packuswb intrinsics have an incorrect return type.
Thanks,
Nicolas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090609/85ed0b5e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part ---------...
2009 Jun 10
0
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Fix SSE2 packing intrinsics return type
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Nicolas Capens<nicolas at capens.net> wrote:
> Please consider committing the attached patch. I believe the SSE2 packsswb,
> packssdw and packuswb intrinsics have an incorrect return type.
If we really wanted to do this, an AutoUpgrade patch would be
necessary for backwards-compatibility. I'm not sure it's worth
bothering.
-Eli
2009 Jun 10
1
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Fix SSE2 packing intrinsics return type
On Jun 9, 2009, at 5:56 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Nicolas Capens<nicolas at capens.net>
> wrote:
>> Please consider committing the attached patch. I believe the SSE2
>> packsswb,
>> packssdw and packuswb intrinsics have an incorrect return type.
>
> If we really wanted to do this, an AutoUpgrade patch would be
> necessary for backwards-compatibility. I'm not sure it's worth
> bothering.
Did they work before with llvm-gcc? If not, then don't...
2009 Jun 10
1
[LLVMdev] [Patch] Fix SSE2 packing intrinsics return type
...riedman
Sent: woensdag 10 juni 2009 2:57
To: LLVM Developers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] [Patch] Fix SSE2 packing intrinsics return type
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Nicolas Capens<nicolas at capens.net> wrote:
> Please consider committing the attached patch. I believe the SSE2
packsswb,
> packssdw and packuswb intrinsics have an incorrect return type.
If we really wanted to do this, an AutoUpgrade patch would be
necessary for backwards-compatibility. I'm not sure it's worth
bothering.
-Eli
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list...
2004 Aug 24
5
MMX/mmxext optimisations
quite some speed improvement indeed.
attached the updated patch to apply to svn/trunk.
j
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: theora-mmx.patch.gz
Type: application/x-gzip
Size: 8648 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/theora-dev/attachments/20040824/5a5f2731/theora-mmx.patch-0001.bin