search for: packetized

What might be causing this error? I see it once in 2-3 days and it goes away when I restart backgroundrb. Quoted below is my backgroundrb_server_11007.log file. Can I do anything to avoid this? Thanks, Raghu ================================================================================== /usr/lib/ruby/1.8/monitor.rb:224:in `mon_exit'': stack level too deep (SystemStackError) from

Hi, I''m brand new to BackgrounDRb and trying to figure out the setup. I cloned the git repository today as listed on the BackgrounDRb website. Starting out with a very basic worker, but BackgroundDRb is crashing on a NameError. Any help to resolve this issue would be greatly appreciated! Thank you in advance!! I am also attaching a text file with the output below since it might be

Found an error or two from my logwatch report from yesterday, thought I would share this in hopes this is just first time run of the problem I noticed in the Kernel report section... Also not sure why there's an issue with automount either.... but I guess I could ask on that issue as well. I am not worried about the NAMED error, this is something that happens due to one of the services that

Hello, I''ve been using backgroundrb successfully for months now, but suddenly I''m getting the error below when trying to start it up. I did some searching and I see that someone posted about it last month: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/backgroundrb-devel/2008-April/001685.html Anyone have any idea what could have happened? I made no changes to the code or configs, but I did

Hello! I have encountered a bug using tincd with Microsoft Windows: Below you'll find my Setup and my Logs. In short, i do the following: 1. office running tincd 1.0.7 and waiting for connections (no ConnectTo, but this does not resolve the issue) 2. the supporter starts up tincd 1.0.7 on windows (native) 3. ping from windows ("support") to the office: Here the error occours:

Hi! I have two identical SIP accounts on Asterisk 1.4.22. One account is registered with eyebeam, the other one is registered with a SNOM phone. When using the eyebeam client DMTF detection works fine, when using the SNOM phone many digits are missing in the DTMF detection. I analyzed with wireshark and both phones uses RFC 2833 and the trace looks pretty the same. Also the rtp debug log

Hi all, I''m new to this list (and pretty new to backgroundrb). I''d like to jump in with a question, I hope you don''t mind. I''m trying to get my site working with backgroundrb to sent mail. It''s pretty basic stuff and I got it working pretty fast on my local machine (os x leopard). Unfortunately, when I try to deploy to my production machine I

Hi, I am using the JitterBuffer. Since there is not so much documentation I think I dont use it in a correct way. All the packets are recieved (I control the sequence numbers) but the JitterBuffer often tells me he has no packet. I am using it in the following way: I am not sure if I use the ticks correctly but I think it can be set to 20(msec). It is set as a Member in my class and i

Hi, I have a question regarding the Asterisk Packet Time for SIP Calls. It is hardcoded at 20ms but when I do an RTP Analysis on a stream it is clear that these packets are not spaced out at 20ms. In general you see something like: Packet 50 - Delay 50ms Packet 51 - Delay 5ms Packet 52 - Delay 5ms Packet 53 - Delay 50ms Packet 54 - Delay 5ms Packet 55 - Delay 5ms Is there anyway to space

Thanks for your reply Jean-Marc! this was what I had before. But I decided to restructure it since the thread that plays the sound is a callback from the sound hardware, more or less an interrupt handler. For me it seems more reasonable to waste some memory for to save the decompressed Packet. While I write this I begin to think that it is possible I decompress Packets that are never used

My BackgrounDRb server intermittently bails out with the following exception in the middle of a long running task running on a Worker sub classed from BackgrounDRb::MetaWorker (the point at which it raises this exception is different each time it runs) /opt/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/packet-0.1.5/lib/packet/packet_core.rb:145:in `schedule_write'': You have a nil object when you

Hello, we have a Linux box running Samba 2.2.7a and several clients running Windows NT 4 WS (last service pack) and Windows 95 (last service pack too). All clients are running a program made in ACU-Cobol for Windows and sometimes the NT machines abort the execution reporting a cobol blocking error. This usually results in broken indexes... We have traced the execution and haven't found the

Thanks for replying so quickly Guus. I will try increasing the re-keying time to 86400, and am now running the servers in debug 5 mode logging to a file, so will get all output. Its interesting what you say about UDP being given lower priority, the two end points of this VPN are actually within the same data center, but are being routed within the DC's core routers (because its going

Hi, I''ve setup a box with xen. For the root machine, it''s ok, it see the network card: alian@yoda:~> /sbin/lspci ... 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8053 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 19) alian@yoda:~> lsmod .... sk98lin 208748 1 alian@yoda:~> /sbin/ifconfig eth0 Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:15:F2:39:D4:DF

Hi, I am using tinc 1.0.23 in router mode and am having trouble with intermittent TCP connect timeouts that do not occur when routing the TCP over the internet directly. I am using a pure IPv6 setup (i.e direct IPv6 connections, and tunneled IPv6 subnets). My configs are as follows: Site 1: ----------------------- tinc.conf: Name = rsukmhb AddressFamily = ipv6 BindToAddress =

Hi, im using a Asterisk Server which is not behind NAT. First i had problems with the fax detection. But this is now solved after adding a wait(2) at the correct place. But i'm still unable to receive a fax due to res_rtp_asterisk.c:3548 ast_rtp_read: RTP Read too short after the Fax session has started. My sip.conf includes [general] allowguest=no alwaysauthreject=yes sendrpid=rpid

Hello, this morning I apparently had tinc crash on me. In 2 independent tinc clusters of 3 nodes each (but located in the same datacenter), one tinc process crashed in each of the clusters. One process apparently with `status=6/ABRT`, the other with `status=11/SEGV`. Interestingly, they crashed with only 5 minutes difference. The only thing I can come up with that might explain this correlation

This mornings activity log shows this: . . . From 23.102.132.99 - 2 packets to tcp(3389) From 23.102.133.164 - 1 packet to tcp(3389) From 23.102.134.239 - 2 packets to tcp(3389) From 23.102.136.210 - 3 packets to tcp(3389) From 23.102.136.222 - 2 packets to tcp(3389) From 23.102.137.62 - 3 packets to tcp(3389) From 23.102.137.101 - 2 packets to tcp(3389) From

dear list, i am trying to write a small program which reads an ogg file and writes it to another ogg file (and changes serial number, granulepos etc on the fly). reading the ogg file is ok (ogg_sync_pageout, ogg_stream_pagein, ogg_stream_packetout). but writing the file doesn't work - the granulepos and page structures don't match with the original file. here's what i am doing.

Sorry if this comes through twice. I already sent this once, before joining the mailing list. I''m attempting to use Backgroundrb to handle asynchronous pdf creation, but in doing so, I''ve run into a very strange problem. Below is a method that''s called from the controller which creates a new worker, then grabs the worker and calls the ''build_pdf''