search for: p200

...kewed.probs ) > 200' uniform samples are generated in R-devel. R-3.5.1 behaves as expected. `epsilon` can be a lot bigger than illustrated and still the uniform distribution is produced. Chuck > set.seed(123) > > epsilon <- 1e-10 > > ## uniform to 200 then small > p200 <- prop.table( rep( c(1, epsilon), c(200, 999-200))) > ## uniform to 201 then small > p201 <- prop.table( rep( c(1, epsilon), c(201, 999-201))) > > brks <- c(0,99,199,200,201,Inf) > tab200 <- sample( length(p200), 10000, prob=p200, replace=TRUE) > tab201 <- sample...

> On Feb 24, 2016, at 09:32, David Chisnall via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > My gut feeling is that it’s not worth it. When we move from typed to untyped pointers, we’re going to change the mangling from something like p200i8 to just p200, which is already quite a bit cleaner, and actually looks cleaner to me than the version proposed in this patch. > > David +1 The prettiness of intrinsic mangling is irrelevant, especially since this will all change with typeless pointers anyway. -Matt

Hi all. I have recently signed up with a adsl supplier. I ordered static ip''s I was given a block from 153-158. I am trying to make it so that each machine gets a live ip address that is accessable on the wan. I am using floppyfw as my router on a p200. I know that I could setup the the eth0 as multiple ip''s and do nat, but I am wondering if there is another way. I just want all the machines to have there own ip and have that ip accessible to the internet with no port blocking or anything..If someone could help that would be greatly apre...

My gut feeling is that it’s not worth it. When we move from typed to untyped pointers, we’re going to change the mangling from something like p200i8 to just p200, which is already quite a bit cleaner, and actually looks cleaner to me than the version proposed in this patch. David > On 24 Feb 2016, at 17:28, Philip Reames via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > This probably needs broader discussion. We have an...

...and unsigned > pbx.c: In function `pbx_builtin_hangup': > pbx.c:4017: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault > ?? > > I had problems with SuSE 8.2 and Asterisk from cvs dated ~12July2003 > > I got it fixed by adding 128MB of memory to the 32MB on this P200 > machine. > with 300MB of swap it should not have made a difference ( except taking > forever ) but it did. > > G! > UK > -- > Uwe Klein [mailto:uwe-klein@foni.net] > KLEIN MESSGERAETE Habertwedt 1 > D-24376 Groedersby b. Kappeln, GERMANY > phone: +49 4642 920 123...

Hi 'tinc users' I'm new whit tinc and this mail-list. I like to build a vpn over the internet between two sites in Holland and Germany. Are there some experience whit the performance (turn-a-round en bandwidth) of a link. I want to use it for a 1,5Mb connection. Greetings, Fred Krom. - Tinc: Discussion list about the tinc VPN daemon Archive:

This probably needs broader discussion. We have an existing naming mechanism for polymorphic intrinsics; Elena is proposing a new one to avoid making the names for various load/store intrinsics particularly ugly. My personal take: 1) I like the cleaner naming scheme. 2) I'm not sure the additional complexity is worth it. (Not specific to the particular implementation proposed here.) 3) I

Hi, after quite some time doing nothing with asterisk I downloaded the current cvs version. Building this on a SuSE 8.2 System with gcc 3.3 i ran into an unpleasant snag: pbx.c:581: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned pbx.c: In function `pbx_substitute_variables_temp': pbx.c:765: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned pbx.c:812: warning: comparison between signed

...backup to take much longer overnight than during the day. I have now run 'top' on both systems overnight and noticed nothing unusual. A remote backup using ssh from the sparc classic to a sparcstation20, overnight, of 1GB takes about 90mins. So 2GB would take about 3hours. Why then does my P200 system to an Ultra 10 take over 8 hours? Any ideas appreciated. Here's the original message: ------- I've recently setup remote ssh backups from my work RH6.1 linux PC to one of our Sun systems. The backup occurs once a week overnight. No problem with this generally, in as much as it work...

...set, all other values are zero. With the mi command i managed to make it back to directory, now i only have to find out which blocks this inode pointed to before it went fubar. Any idea on how to do that? I really want to know what happened really with this inode ... Background: HW: old faithful p200, single ide disks, partitions hda1 on /boot and hda3 on /, both ext3, redhat 7.2. ~/.opera is a symlink pointing to /boot/gold/.opera (/boot was on a raid1 once in the history of that box, with gold dir for 'important' stuff like browser settings, bookmarks and mail). What was happenning w...

Hi Couple months ago I started to have a strange problem with HTB. My setup is Fedora Core 2 + Pentium 2 233 + 128 MB of ram and its serving as a router. For some time since going to kernel 2.6 my HTB QoS Stalls for couple seconds, every couple minutes. If the connection load is bigger the stalling is more frequent and takes longer. I isolated the problem to be with HTB (CBQ works fine). The

hi all, i have applied all patches and compiled the kernel (2.4.21), iptables (1.2.9) and iproute2 (2.4.7-now-ss020116) however when i run "modprobe imq numdevs=1", the system returns - imq.o: init_module: Device or resource busy the transcript is below - [root@vmlinux project]# modprobe imq numdevs=1 /lib/modules/2.4.21-BW/kernel/drivers/net/imq.o: init_module: Device or resource busy

I posted earlier when I noticed that htb was releasing packets in pairs, even though my burst/quantums were 1 pkt. To fix I set HTB_HYSTERESIS 0 in net/sched/sch_htb.c . This gives a noticable gain in upstream worst case latency, for me with 256kbit/s up I used to see +90 sometimes, now it''s +45. For the many who have 128 up it should limit them to +90 rather than +180. Andy.

I am quite new to Linux and have moved (almost) from a windoze NT4 environment. My present configuration is running SuSE V 8.0 with KDE3.0.5 desktop on two machines, connecting with Samba to an NT4 PC, and an occasional laptop or other PC that connects locally to the network. After a deal of searching, researching, and seeking advice I have decided to use Shorewall as my firewall.

Got some solutions myself. LAG is caused by : NETDEV WATCHDOG eth0 timeout this is caused bacause of problems with rtl8139 network card in kernel 2.6.x Solutions : 1.add in lilo.conf : append="noapic" 2.turn apic off in bios 3.if u have 2 rtl8139 cards, then exchange one with some other card type (chipset) btw. all above was found in various polish forums, but none has worked for

Just a quick congrats to John for repling to this email constructivly. Too often do people fire out the ole RTFM speel. More people within the OpenSource community could do with taking a leaf out of his book. On topic for a second, do not discount being able to lower the spec of the below machine due to careful implementation and installation. You may wish to take a look at the kernel

Hello, I have a problem with the latency of the packets passing a Linux router, and I thought perhaps you could put some light on it. It''s quite simple. I have one ADSL connection, and a LAN. The gateway is the Linux machine or a Windows XP machine. When the wXP is routing, for a host inside the LAN, the latency of, for example, the Counter Strike game to a given server is around 20 to 30

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 7:17 AM, James Aylett <james-xapian at tartarus.org> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 10:58:43PM +0530, Richhiey Thomas wrote: > > K-Means or something related certainly seems like a viable approach, > so what you'll need to do is to come up with a proposal of how you'd > implement this in Xapian (either with reference to the previous work, >

...subject area would create. There's some discussion of how you might evaluate this in Introduction to Information Retrieval, section 16.3 p356 (or online at http://nlp.stanford.edu/IR-book/html/htmledition/evaluation-of-clustering-1.html). It's perhaps worth pointing out that Hearst (2009, p200) suggests that monothetic clusters 'may be easier for users to understand', although it doesn't cite any specific work to back up this claim. But that may argue that a K-means based approach isn't necessarily going to be the most helpful in all cases; there may be other approaches w...