search for: overo

...iling tests manually on my arm board and can now categorize most of the thirteen unexpected CodeGen failures in four categories: 1. llvm don't lower MVT::i64 properly on arm errors http://labb.zafena.se/shark-testing/llvmARMCodeGenFailures200904/i64armLoweringRelatedErrors/ example: root at overo:/home/xerxes/llvm-test/fail/CodeGen/notnativelysupported# llvm-as < 2008-02-04-ExtractSubvector.ll | llc llc: /usr/src/openembedded/overo/tmp/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/llvm2.6-2.6-r0/llvm-2.6/include/llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h:158: llvm::TargetRegisterClass* llvm::TargetLowering::get...

Hi Xerxes, > 4. softfloat related errors > http://labb.zafena.se/shark-testing/llvmARMCodeGenFailures200904/softenfloat_Do_not_know_how_to_soften_the_result_of_this_operator/ > example: > > root at overo:/home/xerxes/llvm-test/fail/CodeGen/softenfloat# llvm-as < 2007-11-19-VectorSplitting.ll | llc > SoftenFloatResult #0: 0x614e00: f32 = undef > llc: /usr/src/openembedded/overo/tmp/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/llvm2.6-2.6-r0/llvm-2.6/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeFloatTypes.cpp:5...

LLVM ARM v6 backend is in fairly good shape. Even the JIT passes nearly the entire llvm test suite. There are some known missing bits: 1. Exception handling 2. Atomic Not sure: 3. Debugging support (should be trivial to hook up if it's not done) Also the thumb backend is not awesome. Its performance is not great. Evan On Apr 1, 2009, at 6:34 AM, Robert Schuster wrote: > Hi, > the

Hi, the ARM backend lacks some stuff like support for atomic intrinsics. I learned the hard way (crash). Lately I was told that the ARM backend of LLVM is generally in its early stages of development. I would like to know more about this. Which stuff is missing, known to be unstable and the like. Thanks in advance for taking the time. Regards Robert -------------- next part -------------- A

Duncan Sands skrev: > Hi Xerxes, > > >> 4. softfloat related errors >> http://labb.zafena.se/shark-testing/llvmARMCodeGenFailures200904/softenfloat_Do_not_know_how_to_soften_the_result_of_this_operator/ >> example: >> >> root at overo:/home/xerxes/llvm-test/fail/CodeGen/softenfloat# llvm-as < 2007-11-19-VectorSplitting.ll | llc >> SoftenFloatResult #0: 0x614e00: f32 = undef >> llc: /usr/src/openembedded/overo/tmp/work/armv7a-angstrom-linux-gnueabi/llvm2.6-2.6-r0/llvm-2.6/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/LegalizeFloatTyp...

On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Joe Abbey <jabbey at arxan.com> wrote: > LLVM Supports: > ARMv4T  -> ARM7TDMI > ARMv5TE -> ARM926EJ-S >         -> XScale > ARMv6   -> ARM1136J(F)-S > ARMv6ZK -> ARM1176JZ(F)-S > ARMv7A  -> Cortex-A8 >            Cortex-A9 > ARMv7M  -> Cortex-M3 Does the LLVM code generator generate Thumb code in addition to

...The ARM-based Raspberry Pi is very close to shipping. The entry-level unit will retail for just $25 with a higher-end model for $35. I don't recall who makes it, but there is an ARM desktop computer that retails for $149, with the same company making an ARM Netbook for $199. I have a Gumstix Overo Fire COM which I'm using mostly to experiment with ARM assembly code and ARM-specific optimizations in C, C++ and Objective-C. When I get it configured reliably I'd be happy to dedicate it as a test machine most of the time. https://www.gumstix.com/store/product_info.php?products_id=227...

...on '@vector_select' Aborted $ llvm-as < test/CodeGen/X86/dagcombine-buildvector.ll | llc Formal argument #1 has unhandled type i64 Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: llc 1. Running pass 'ARM Instruction Selection' on function '@test' Aborted I have tested this on a overo-earth ti omap3 hardware Linux overo 2.6.28-omap1 #1 Mon Mar 2 08:40:39 PST 2009 armv7l unknown Cheers, and have a great day! Xerxes Sandeep Patel skrev: > After wasting an inordinate amount of time trying to get test-suite to > run on arm-apple-darwin so I could reproduce your results, atta...

...The ARM-based Raspberry Pi is very close to shipping. The entry-level unit will retail for just $25 with a higher-end model for $35. I don't recall who makes it, but there is an ARM desktop computer that retails for $149, with the same company making an ARM Netbook for $199. I have a Gumstix Overo Fire COM which I'm using mostly to experiment with ARM assembly code and ARM-specific optimizations in C, C++ and Objective-C. When I get it configured reliably I'd be happy to dedicate it as a test machine most of the time. https://www.gumstix.com/store/product_info.php?products_id=227...

I'm working on a couple of Yocto Project based embedded projects, one using a Gumstix Overo board and the other using an Intel Atom motherboard. Both need a simple Samba server, which isn't included in the standard build. The only existing Yocto-compatible recipe for Samba is an OpenEmbedded one for version 3.6.8. I was quite surprised to find that adding Samba almost tripled the size...

...The ARM-based Raspberry Pi is very close to shipping. The entry-level unit will retail for just $25 with a higher-end model for $35. I don't recall who makes it, but there is an ARM desktop computer that retails for $149, with the same company making an ARM Netbook for $199. I have a Gumstix Overo Fire COM which I'm using mostly to experiment with ARM assembly code and ARM-specific optimizations in C, C++ and Objective-C. When I get it configured reliably I'd be happy to dedicate it as a test machine most of the time. https://www.gumstix.com/store/product_info.php?products_id=227...

Admittedly we're very interested in becoming ARM backend maintainers as our product heavily relies on LLVM. However, we don't have testing resources to test both our product and LLVM on a host of target boards. We have some chumbys, beagleboards, iPhones, iPod Touches, tables, Android Phones, etc. And most of those are already booked solid with our own regression tests (most of which

...very close to shipping. The entry-level > unit will retail for just $25 with a higher-end model for $35. I > don't recall who makes it, but there is an ARM desktop computer that > retails for $149, with the same company making an ARM Netbook for > $199. > > I have a Gumstix Overo Fire COM which I'm using mostly to experiment > with ARM assembly code and ARM-specific optimizations in C, C++ and > Objective-C. When I get it configured reliably I'd be happy to > dedicate it as a test machine most of the time. Pawel

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 06:20:17PM -0500, David A. Greene wrote: > This seems excessive and unrealistic. We're never going to come up with > a testsuite that satisfies everyone's needs and doing so could well be > counter-productive. If no one can commit anything unless it passes > every test (including performance) for every target under multiple > option combinations,

I'm not currently setup to be able to run the A/B comparison tests that test-suite relies upon. Fhourstones-3.1 looks to be the simplest. If you can send me the two .o files from either EABI or Darwin, I can dig into why this went wrong for you. deep On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Evan Cheng <echeng at apple.com> wrote: > Sorry I haven't gotten back to you earlier. I have

After wasting an inordinate amount of time trying to get test-suite to run on arm-apple-darwin so I could reproduce your results, attached is a patch that fixes the small copy&paste error of having 8-byte alignment for stack-allocated f64s instead of the proper 4-byte. I've updated the patch to the top of trunk changes as well. deep On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Sandeep Patel