Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "outrank".
Did you mean:
outranks
2006 Jul 25
1
Best place for authorization management tool?
...rom bob with priority 1
>> allow vendors/destroy for bob with priority 10
>> flush
Above, rules are controller/action pairs (permitting wildcards), and
each rule is assigned a priority (so above bob could do everything
except destroy anything other than vendors). Denials outrank
allowances of the same priority. To see if a certain action is
allowed for the current ruleset, one could query a controller/action
pair, or list out all the current rules:
>> query employees/destroy for bob
Denied
>> query vendors/destroy for bob
Allowed...
2011 Mar 06
4
Recovering "parent transid verify failed"
Hey,
I''d start by saying that I know Btrfs is a still experimental, and so
there''s no guarantee that one would be able to help me at all... But I
thought I''ll try anyway :-)
Few months ago I bought a new laptop and installed ArchLinux on it,
with Btrfs on the root filesystem... I know, it''s not the smartest
thing to do...
After a few month I had issues with my
2008 Oct 15
1
Re: Problem with new action
Try running "rake routes" to see if the URL you get is recognized as a
resource url. Maybe the :controller/:action/:id route outranks your
resources route. The resources route should be specified higher up in
the file.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To...
2009 Aug 18
0
[LLVMdev] X86 Disassembler
...t, please use "Instruction" or "Instr" instead of
"Insn" for consistency's sake.
9. You have types called "operandType_t", etc. We normally don't use
the "_t" suffix for types. Perhaps renaming them.
10. In the "static inline bool outranks(instructionContext_t upper,
instructionContext_t lower)", it would be good to assert that upper
and lower are strictly less than IC_max.
11. In several places, you put 'default: assert(0 && "Badness happens
here!");" at the end of a switch statement. When ass...
2009 Aug 18
2
[LLVMdev] X86 Disassembler
Dear mailing list:
the attached diff implements a table-driven disassembler for the X86
architecture (16-, 32-, and 64-bit incarnations), integrated into the
MC framework. The disassembler is table-driven, using a custom
TableGen backend to generate hierarchical tables optimized for fast
decode. The disassembler consumes MemoryObjects and produces arrays
of MCInsts, adhering to the
2004 Nov 30
1
RE: question about rails regarding handling more than onetable in one view
Hi, Jarkko:
Thanks for the quick reply.
I understand I can use ActiveRecord to specify the relation between the
table as you have suggested,
The part that I have trouble to understand is
1. Since I have a third table ProvWorkAtDept, do I need to specify this
table somewhere when I define Provider or Dept?
2. If the provider view has both the provider name and several depts the
provider
2016 Nov 08
5
CentOS 6.3 packages updates options without upgrading.
>
>
>
> Show us this "no way to update system properly" to get a clear big picture
> that is allowing us to provide you with potentially better solutions.
>
Thanks really Leon very much w/ a very resourceful info. esp release notes
helps across minor versions. So, this is for a friend of mine, and I have
been told that they will not currently consider updating their
2009 Aug 19
3
[LLVMdev] X86 Disassembler
...'s sake.
Fixed. Thanks for the heads-up.
> 9. You have types called "operandType_t", etc. We normally don't use
> the "_t" suffix for types. Perhaps renaming them.
Fixed. Now for example operandType_t is OperandType.
> 10. In the "static inline bool outranks(instructionContext_t upper,
> instructionContext_t lower)", it would be good to assert that upper
> and lower are strictly less than IC_max.
Asserted.
> 11. In several places, you put 'default: assert(0 && "Badness
> happens here!");" at the end...