search for: outranks

Hi all, I''m sitting on a home-brew rule-based authorization system that I''d like to release as open source. Its current interface is either the console or raw SQL though, which makes things pretty unfriendly, so I was wondering just what would be the most idiomatic interface to such a system. I was envisioning a "authorization console" in script/ that might

Hey, I''d start by saying that I know Btrfs is a still experimental, and so there''s no guarantee that one would be able to help me at all... But I thought I''ll try anyway :-) Few months ago I bought a new laptop and installed ArchLinux on it, with Btrfs on the root filesystem... I know, it''s not the smartest thing to do... After a few month I had issues with my

Try running "rake routes" to see if the URL you get is recognized as a resource url. Maybe the :controller/:action/:id route outranks your resources route. The resources route should be specified higher up in the file. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To...

...t, please use "Instruction" or "Instr" instead of "Insn" for consistency's sake. 9. You have types called "operandType_t", etc. We normally don't use the "_t" suffix for types. Perhaps renaming them. 10. In the "static inline bool outranks(instructionContext_t upper, instructionContext_t lower)", it would be good to assert that upper and lower are strictly less than IC_max. 11. In several places, you put 'default: assert(0 && "Badness happens here!");" at the end of a switch statement. When asse...

Dear mailing list: the attached diff implements a table-driven disassembler for the X86 architecture (16-, 32-, and 64-bit incarnations), integrated into the MC framework. The disassembler is table-driven, using a custom TableGen backend to generate hierarchical tables optimized for fast decode. The disassembler consumes MemoryObjects and produces arrays of MCInsts, adhering to the

Hi, Jarkko: Thanks for the quick reply. I understand I can use ActiveRecord to specify the relation between the table as you have suggested, The part that I have trouble to understand is 1. Since I have a third table ProvWorkAtDept, do I need to specify this table somewhere when I define Provider or Dept? 2. If the provider view has both the provider name and several depts the provider

> > > > Show us this "no way to update system properly" to get a clear big picture > that is allowing us to provide you with potentially better solutions. > Thanks really Leon very much w/ a very resourceful info. esp release notes helps across minor versions. So, this is for a friend of mine, and I have been told that they will not currently consider updating their

...'s sake. Fixed. Thanks for the heads-up. > 9. You have types called "operandType_t", etc. We normally don't use > the "_t" suffix for types. Perhaps renaming them. Fixed. Now for example operandType_t is OperandType. > 10. In the "static inline bool outranks(instructionContext_t upper, > instructionContext_t lower)", it would be good to assert that upper > and lower are strictly less than IC_max. Asserted. > 11. In several places, you put 'default: assert(0 && "Badness > happens here!");" at the end o...