search for: outgrown

Hello. We are looking for a new provider to host our Rails site -- we have outgrown our current provider (for the past 4 years) since our business is beginning to take off in a big way this year. Which provider (e.g. Rackspace, Engine Yard, Heroku, Serverbeach, etc.) would you recommend to run a highly scalable site? FYI, we currently have over 150,000 users that will likely gro...

I apologized ahead of time if this post shouldn''t go here but I having been knocking my heading for the last two days trying to get over the following error while trying to "clone" my primary puppetmasterd because we have outgrown one puppetmasterd setup. I have basically set up a 2nd instance of our primary puppetmasterd and rsync''ed over /var/lib/puppet/ssl/ from the primary to the secondary puppetmasterd. The client ran to completion (and recorded the log in /var/lib/puppet/report/) but the file copying stateme...

Hello, I'm planning to convert my phone system to Asterisk, as I've outgrown my TalkSwitch system. I have a few questions for experienced * users, most of which can be answered yes/no. Current Setup: - Talkswitch 48NLS (4CO/8Ext) phone system. - One CO line, two Vonage lines, one Voicepulse line connected to phone system - A third Vonage line directly connected to a fax m...

...re around the lab.llvm.org testing infrastructure, and perhaps even get llvm.org and the mailing lists hosted somewhere with more guarantees on uptime and service. I really like LLVM being on "neutral ground" given the wide range of organizations that contribute to and use it, and it has outgrown the University of Illinois. With these as the goal, there are a number of options. We could incorporate our own non-profit for the project, but that has a relatively high administrative overhead, and we'd all rather be writing code. :) Another option is to join an existing non-profit organi...

...end up in flame-wars. This is a serious request because my time frame is about 2 months to identify, select, acquire, install and setup our next PBX at a new office. I really would like it to be a VoIP solution.] Our small real estate firm is experiencing explosive growth lately and we've outgrown our Nortel ICS 4x12 PBX... I don't like the telco options and am VERY seriously considering VoIP. My requirements are: 6-8 fxo 25-50 multi-line hard/soft-phones mixed Windows/Linux office Initially, I only need simple telephony features in a pseudo call center where one/two agents are prime...

...> So for example, when a transformation pass invalidates > `(AssumptionAnalysis, function @bar)`, we need to walk > `(SomeModuleAnalysis, module TheModule)` and `(SomeFunctionAnalysis, > function @baz)` to invalidate them. > Compare this with the old PM (although like I said we have outgrown > this model). Essentially you take the previous mapping, and require > IRUnit to be a constant at any given point in time. Hence the > mapping is essentially > Analysis -> AnalysisResult > Since this is 1:1 there is no real distinction between the Analysis > and the AnalysisRe...

...perhaps ? Not sure if its intentional or not (or a bug) but it is a problem. Sorry if this is the wrong list, I could not find a samba-bugs mlist. Any responses please direct to oldirtychinaman@lycos.com, I am not on the list. Thank you ________________________________________________________ Outgrown your current e-mail service? Get a 25MB Inbox, POP3 Access, No Ads and No Taglines with LYCOS MAIL PLUS. http://login.mail.lycos.com/brandPage.shtml?pageId=plus

...king at a problem of scheduling the lifetime of analyses of the same IRUnit intermingled with transformation passes on that same IRUnit, so you only have the "analysis" part of the tuple above, making things much simpler (and handling dependencies is much simpler too). We've obviously outgrown this model with examples like LAA, AssumptionCacheTracker, etc. that hack around this in the old PM. We may want to have a fresh re-examination of what problems we are exactly trying to solve. For me, my main concern now is what changes need to be made in order to feel confident running a pipeline...

Hi Talin, On Feb 27, 2010, at 22:06, Talin wrote: > The main problem with shadow-stack is that it's not thread-safe. It sounds like you've outgrown it, then. > What about modifying the shadow-stack to use a thread-local linked list? > Another alternative is to add an additional parameter to every function containing the address of the head of the stack frame list. and have a good understanding of why. Many managed runtimes tackle th...

...Analysis, function @bar)`, we need to walk > > > `(SomeModuleAnalysis, module TheModule)` and > > > `(SomeFunctionAnalysis, > > > function @baz)` to invalidate them. > > > > > > Compare this with the old PM (although like I said we have > > > outgrown > > > this model). Essentially you take the previous mapping, and > > > require > > > IRUnit to be a constant at any given point in time. Hence the > > > mapping is essentially > > > > > > Analysis -> AnalysisResult > > > > &g...

http://rails-spinoffs.bombdiggity.net/index.php?title=Main_Page guys here is the wiki. Once you register let me know and I''ll give you full access to the site. Jon Jon Whitcraft Online Services (317) 492-8623 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...Analysis, function @bar)`, we need to walk > > > `(SomeModuleAnalysis, module TheModule)` and > > > `(SomeFunctionAnalysis, > > > function @baz)` to invalidate them. > > > > > > Compare this with the old PM (although like I said we have > > > outgrown > > > this model). Essentially you take the previous mapping, and > > > require > > > IRUnit to be a constant at any given point in time. Hence the > > > mapping is essentially > > > > > > Analysis -> AnalysisResult > > > > &g...

...formation pass invalidates >> `(AssumptionAnalysis, function @bar)`, we need to walk >> `(SomeModuleAnalysis, module TheModule)` and `(SomeFunctionAnalysis, >> function @baz)` to invalidate them. >> >> >> Compare this with the old PM (although like I said we have outgrown this >> model). Essentially you take the previous mapping, and require IRUnit to be >> a constant at any given point in time. Hence the mapping is essentially >> Analysis -> AnalysisResult >> Since this is 1:1 there is no real distinction between the Analysis and >>...

...es >>> `(AssumptionAnalysis, function @bar)`, we need to walk >>> `(SomeModuleAnalysis, module TheModule)` and `(SomeFunctionAnalysis, >>> function @baz)` to invalidate them. >>> >>> >>> Compare this with the old PM (although like I said we have outgrown this >>> model). Essentially you take the previous mapping, and require IRUnit to be >>> a constant at any given point in time. Hence the mapping is essentially >>> Analysis -> AnalysisResult >>> Since this is 1:1 there is no real distinction between the Analy...

Does Asterisk work with Lucent or any other PBX phone systems????

...ling the lifetime of analyses of the same IRUnit >> intermingled with transformation passes on that same IRUnit, so you only >> have the "analysis" part of the tuple above, making things much simpler >> (and handling dependencies is much simpler too). We've obviously outgrown >> this model with examples like LAA, AssumptionCacheTracker, etc. that hack >> around this in the old PM. We may want to have a fresh re-examination of >> what problems we are exactly trying to solve. >> >> For me, my main concern now is what changes need to be made i...

...ormation passes on that same IRUnit, so > > > > you > > > > only have the "analysis" part of the tuple above, making things > > > > much > > > > simpler (and handling dependencies is much simpler too). We've > > > > obviously outgrown this model with examples like LAA, > > > > AssumptionCacheTracker, etc. that hack around this in the old > > > > PM. > > > > We > > > > may want to have a fresh re-examination of what problems we are > > > > exactly trying to solve. > &...

LLVM's Attribute APIs need an overhaul. Current problems ================ First, testing for an attribute on an Argument is slow. llvm::AttributeSet::getAttributes(int) consumed 2% of cycles while optimizing llc during LTO. Our mid-level optimizations are constantly asking if a given argument has some attribute (nonnull, dereferencable, etc), and this is currently linear in the size of the

...lyses of the same IRUnit >>>> intermingled with transformation passes on that same IRUnit, so you only >>>> have the "analysis" part of the tuple above, making things much simpler >>>> (and handling dependencies is much simpler too). We've obviously outgrown >>>> this model with examples like LAA, AssumptionCacheTracker, etc. that hack >>>> around this in the old PM. We may want to have a fresh re-examination of >>>> what problems we are exactly trying to solve. >>>> >>>> For me, my main conce...

...>>>>>> intermingled with transformation passes on that same IRUnit, so you only >>>>>> have the "analysis" part of the tuple above, making things much simpler >>>>>> (and handling dependencies is much simpler too). We've obviously outgrown >>>>>> this model with examples like LAA, AssumptionCacheTracker, etc. that hack >>>>>> around this in the old PM. We may want to have a fresh re-examination of >>>>>> what problems we are exactly trying to solve. >>>>>> >&g...