search for: ornl

Nithya, I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is there any way we could possibly resolve it today? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:26 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov>, "gluster-users at gluster.org" <gluster-users at gluster.org>, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4 On 31 Ja...

Hi Eva, I'm sorry but I need to get in touch with another developer to check about the changes here and he will be available only tomorrow. Is there someone else I could work with while you are away? Regards, Nithya On 31 January 2018 at 22:00, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is there any > way we could possibly resolve it today? > > > > Thanks, > > Eva (865) 574-6894 > > > > *From: *Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat....

...uster.org/#/c/17618/9/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-utils.c . But even if we fix it today, I don't think we have a release planned immediately for shipping this. Are you planning to fix the code and re-compile? Regards, Amar On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > I will be out of the office for ~10 days starting tomorrow. Is there any > way we could possibly resolve it today? > > > > Thanks, > > Eva (865) 574-6894 > > > > *From: *Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat....

...rick-count are still the same. I did not re-start the volume after setting the cluster.min-free-inodes to 6%. Do I need to restart it? Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 11:14 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov>, "gluster-users at gluster.org" <gluster-users at gluster.org>, Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4 On 31 J...

...fixed with setting the shared-brick-count or some other option. Since this is a production system, we will wait until a fix is in a release. Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 12:15 PM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com>, "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov>, "gluster-users at gluster.org" <gluster-users at gluster.org> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4 Hi...

On 31 January 2018 at 21:50, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > The values for shared-brick-count are still the same. I did not re-start > the volume after setting the cluster.min-free-inodes to 6%. Do I need to > restart it? > > > That is not necessary. Let me get back to you on this tomorrow. Regards, Nithya > Thanks...

...Check the .vol files to see if the value has changed. It should now be 1.You do not need to restart the volume. See [1] for more details. Regards, Nithya [1] http://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/GlusterFS%20Filter/ On 31 January 2018 at 23:39, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Amar, > > > > Thanks for your prompt reply. No, I do not plan to fix the code and > re-compile. I was hoping it could be fixed with setting the > shared-brick-count or some other option. Since this is a production system, > we will wait until a fix is in a...

...ental block size: 4096 Blocks: Total: 15626471424 Free: 15626461604 Available: 15626461604 Inodes: Total: 1250159424 Free: 1250153857 Thanks, Eva (865) 574-6894 From: Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2018 at 10:46 AM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov>, "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov> Cc: Amar Tumballi <atumball at redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4 Thank you Eva. From the files you sent: dataeng.jacen.bricks-data_A1-dataeng.vol: op...

On 31 January 2018 at 21:34, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > Nithya, > > > > Responding to an earlier question: Before the upgrade, we were at 3.103 on > these servers, but some of the clients were 3.7.6. From below, does this > mean that ?shared-brick-count? needs to be set to 1 for all bricks. > > > > All...

This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. unknown user pushed a commit to branch master in repository centos/centos.org. The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push: new c10f929 ornl video c10f929 is described below commit c10f92988b176fab93f5f37f0f37f39c654c180f Author: rbowen <rbowen at rcbowen.com> AuthorDate: Mon May 20 09:09:43 2019 -0400 ornl video --- content/index.erb | 24 ++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --g...

...dev/sdd1 59T 39M 59T 1% /bricks/data_B4 /dev/sda1 59T 38T 22T 64% /bricks/data_B1 server-B:/dataeng 350T 83T 268T 24% /dataeng Eva Freer From: Sam McLeod <mailinglists at smcleod.net> Date: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 9:43 PM To: Eva Freer <freereb at ornl.gov> Cc: "gluster-users at gluster.org" <gluster-users at gluster.org>, "Greene, Tami McFarlin" <greenet at ornl.gov> Subject: Re: [Gluster-users] df does not show full volume capacity after update to 3.12.4 We noticed something similar. Out of interest, does du...

...the best way to get f(x,y) for each row of the matrix? I tried result<-f(m[,1],m[,2]) but it doesn't work. Thanks! Bing --------------------------------- 1060 Commerce Park Oak Ridge National Laboratory P.O. Box 2008, MS 6480 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6480 Phone: 865-241-0761 Email: zhangb at ornl.gov

...8 at 12:24 PM, <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Justin Bogner [mailto:justin at justinbogner.com] On Behalf Of Justin > > Bogner > > Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2018 12:16 PM > > To: llvm-dev > > Cc: jdenny.ornl at gmail.com; Robinson, Paul > > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] RFC: [FileCheck] CHECK-DAG for multiple > > occurrences of string > > > > Paul Robinson <paul.robinson at sony.com> writes: > > >> From: Joel E. Denny [mailto:jdenny.ornl at gmail.com] > > >&...

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 12:24 PM, <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > >> >> >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Justin Bogner [mailto:justin at justinbogner.com] On Behalf Of >> Justin >> > Bogner >> &...

...y inconvenient, so don't see that as a solution. Cheers. ________________________________ From: Mehdi AMINI <joker.eph at gmail.com> Sent: 19 June 2020 09:32 To: Sjoerd Meijer <Sjoerd.Meijer at arm.com> Cc: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com>; Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl at gmail.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] FileCheck On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 12:56 AM Sjoerd Meijer via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Sorry if I wasn't clear about my us...

...ondition. I tried using a for loop, however, it took me forever to get the result. Is there a fast way to do this? Thanks! Bing --------------------------------- 1060 Commerce Park Oak Ridge National Laboratory P.O. Box 2008, MS 6480 Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6480 Phone: 865-241-0761 Email: zhangb at ornl.gov

...rbose mode with: bin/llvm-lit -a ../llvm/test/CodeGen/my_test.ll In a terminal, the new default behaviour of FileCheck has become pretty unusable IMHO. ________________________________ From: Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> Sent: 18 June 2020 20:49 To: Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl at gmail.com> Cc: Sjoerd Meijer <Sjoerd.Meijer at arm.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: RE: [llvm-dev] FileCheck Sjoerd specifically said “in verbose mode”, which I interpret to mean “when passing -v or -vv”. If we’re discussing the default beha...

...r. Out of interest, does du -sh . show the same size? -- Sam McLeod (protoporpoise on IRC) https://smcleod.net https://twitter.com/s_mcleod Words are my own opinions and do not necessarily represent those of my employer or partners. > On 31 Jan 2018, at 12:47 pm, Freer, Eva B. <freereb at ornl.gov> wrote: > > After OS update to CentOS 7.4 or RedHat 6.9 and update to Gluster 3.12.4, the ?df? command shows only part of the available space on the mount point for multi-brick volumes. All nodes are at 3.12.4. This occurs on both servers and clients. > > We have 2 different...

After OS update to CentOS 7.4 or RedHat 6.9 and update to Gluster 3.12.4, the ?df? command shows only part of the available space on the mount point for multi-brick volumes. All nodes are at 3.12.4. This occurs on both servers and clients. We have 2 different server configurations. Configuration 1: A distributed volume of 8 bricks with 4 on each server. The initial configuration had 4 bricks of

...rtain the issue in this thread is just the verbosity of -dump-input=fail. Yes, -vv makes it even more verbose by annotating input lines with good matches, etc., but that's not part of the "new behaviour" Sjoerd meant, I believe. Joel > > > *From:* Joel E. Denny <jdenny.ornl at gmail.com> > *Sent:* Thursday, June 18, 2020 10:54 AM > *To:* Chris Tetreault <ctetreau at quicinc.com> > *Cc:* Sjoerd Meijer <Sjoerd.Meijer at arm.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > *Subject:* [EXT] Re: [llvm-dev] FileCheck > > > > Hi Chris, > > >...