search for: optioncategori

Hi, Recently I started getting some weird errors from multiple tools (on Linux x86-64): λ lld lld: ../lib/Support/CommandLine.cpp:202: void (anonymous namespace)::CommandLineParser::registerCategory(llvm::cl::OptionCategory *): Assertion `std::count_if(RegisteredOptionCategories.begin(), RegisteredOptionCategories.end(), [cat](const OptionCategory *Category) { return cat->getName() == Category->getName(); }) == 0 && "Duplicate option categories"' failed. [1] 25383 abort (core dumped) lld λ lldb-server : CommandLine Error: Option 'deb...

...ile for the "root" directory is in [3] The CMakeLists.txt file for the "pass" directory is in [4] When I run opt --load=libTest.so I trigger the following assertion: opt: CommandLine.cpp:134: void llvm::cl::OptionCategory::registerCategory(): Assertion `std::count_if(RegisteredOptionCategories->begin(), RegisteredOptionCategories->end(), [this](const OptionCategory *Category) { return getName() == Category->getName(); }) == 0 && "Duplicate option categories"' failed. Note that my pass does not even define any command line option. I am using LLVM 3.5 git...

...egistered more than once! I narrowed it down to the Core lib but without it I get this opt: /home/qwert/projects/ext/repos/llvm/6.0.0/lib/Support/CommandLine.cpp:281: void (anonymous namespace)::CommandLineParser::registerCategory(llvm::cl::OptionCategory *): Assertion `count_if(RegisteredOptionCategories, [cat](const OptionCategory *Category) { return cat->getName() == Category->getName(); }) == 0 && "Duplicate option categories"' failed. LLVMSymbolizer: error reading file: No such file or directory #0 0x0000000001d8eea4 (opt+0x1d8eea4) #1 0x0000000001d8f206 (opt+0...

...uot;pass" directory is in [4] > > > > When I run opt --load=libTest.so > > I trigger the following assertion: > > > > opt: CommandLine.cpp:134: void > > llvm::cl::OptionCategory::registerCategory(): Assertion > > `std::count_if(RegisteredOptionCategories->begin(), > > RegisteredOptionCategories->end(), [this](const OptionCategory > *Category) > > { return getName() == Category->getName(); }) == 0 && "Duplicate > option > > categories"' failed. > > > > Note that my pass...

...ut without it I get this >> >> opt: >> /home/qwert/projects/ext/repos/llvm/6.0.0/lib/Support/CommandLine.cpp:281: >> >> void (anonymous >> namespace)::CommandLineParser::registerCategory(llvm::cl::OptionCategory >> *): >> Assertion `count_if(RegisteredOptionCategories, [cat](const >> OptionCategory *Category) { return cat->getName() == >> Category->getName(); }) == 0 && "Duplicate option categories"' failed. >> LLVMSymbolizer: error reading file: No such file or directory >> #0 0x0000000001d8eea4 (opt+0x1d8ee...

Hi, I'm a contributor to the KLEE project (based on LLVM) and I'm currently looking at trying to add the following functionality to KLEE... (1). Be able to iterate through registered command line options and programmatically hide them. We're interested in this because we wish to hide (unless -help-hidden is called) several LLVM options. (2). Be able to place an option into a category

On 07/22/2013 11:58 PM, Star Tan wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > > I have attached a patch file to optimize string operations in Polly-Detect pass. > In this patch file, I put most of long string operations in the condition variable of "PollyViewMode" or in the DEBUG mode. OK. > From 448482106e8d815afa40e4ce8543ba3f6f0237f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Star Tan

Hi Tobias, I have attached a patch file to optimize string operations in Polly-Detect pass. In this patch file, I put most of long string operations in the condition variable of "PollyViewMode" or in the DEBUG mode. Bests, Star Tan At 2013-07-22 22:27:48,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 07/22/2013 01:46 AM, Star Tan wrote: >> At

On 07/22/2013 01:46 AM, Star Tan wrote: > At 2013-07-22 12:16:53,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> I propose two more patches: >> >> 1) Transform the INVALID macro into function calls, that format >> the text and that set LastFailure. > Translating the INVALID macro into function calls would complicate the operations for