search for: optioncategory

Hi, Recently I started getting some weird errors from multiple tools (on Linux x86-64): λ lld lld: ../lib/Support/CommandLine.cpp:202: void (anonymous namespace)::CommandLineParser::registerCategory(llvm::cl::OptionCategory *): Assertion `std::count_if(RegisteredOptionCategories.begin(), RegisteredOptionCategories.end(), [cat](const OptionCategory *Category) { return cat->getName() == Category->getName(); }) == 0 && "Duplicate option categories"' failed. [1] 25383 abort (core dumped) ll...

...] that triggers the problem. Pass body is in [2]. The CMakeLists.txt file for the "root" directory is in [3] The CMakeLists.txt file for the "pass" directory is in [4] When I run opt --load=libTest.so I trigger the following assertion: opt: CommandLine.cpp:134: void llvm::cl::OptionCategory::registerCategory(): Assertion `std::count_if(RegisteredOptionCategories->begin(), RegisteredOptionCategories->end(), [this](const OptionCategory *Category) { return getName() == Category->getName(); }) == 0 && "Duplicate option categories"' failed. Note that my pass...

...t: CommandLine Error: Option 'debug-pass' registered more than once! I narrowed it down to the Core lib but without it I get this opt: /home/qwert/projects/ext/repos/llvm/6.0.0/lib/Support/CommandLine.cpp:281: void (anonymous namespace)::CommandLineParser::registerCategory(llvm::cl::OptionCategory *): Assertion `count_if(RegisteredOptionCategories, [cat](const OptionCategory *Category) { return cat->getName() == Category->getName(); }) == 0 && "Duplicate option categories"' failed. LLVMSymbolizer: error reading file: No such file or directory #0 0x0000000001...

..."root" directory is in [3] > > The CMakeLists.txt file for the "pass" directory is in [4] > > > > When I run opt --load=libTest.so > > I trigger the following assertion: > > > > opt: CommandLine.cpp:134: void > > llvm::cl::OptionCategory::registerCategory(): Assertion > > `std::count_if(RegisteredOptionCategories->begin(), > > RegisteredOptionCategories->end(), [this](const OptionCategory > *Category) > > { return getName() == Category->getName(); }) == 0 && "Duplicate > option...

...e than once! >> >> I narrowed it down to the Core lib but without it I get this >> >> opt: >> /home/qwert/projects/ext/repos/llvm/6.0.0/lib/Support/CommandLine.cpp:281: >> >> void (anonymous >> namespace)::CommandLineParser::registerCategory(llvm::cl::OptionCategory >> *): >> Assertion `count_if(RegisteredOptionCategories, [cat](const >> OptionCategory *Category) { return cat->getName() == >> Category->getName(); }) == 0 && "Duplicate option categories"' failed. >> LLVMSymbolizer: error reading file: No...

...g ideas (1) and (2) but I don't want to spend time implementing it if the idea won't be accepted and merged into LLVM so I wanted to discuss the idea first a little first before diving in. To implement idea (2) we could have something like this in LLVM command Line library class llvm::cl::OptionCategory { protected OptionCategory() { //code to register category with a global store, all heavy lifting work is done here! } virtual const char* getName()=0; //shown as option category header name in --help virtual const char* getHelpDescription()=0; //shown below the option category header name in...

...49 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/polly/Options.h b/include/polly/Options.h > index 62e0960..733edd0 100644 > --- a/include/polly/Options.h > +++ b/include/polly/Options.h > @@ -17,4 +17,7 @@ > #include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h" > > extern llvm::cl::OptionCategory PollyCategory; > +namespace polly { > + extern bool PollyViewMode; > +} > #endif > diff --git a/include/polly/ScopDetection.h b/include/polly/ScopDetection.h > index 6ee48ee..5a5d7d1 100755 > --- a/include/polly/ScopDetection.h > +++ b/include/polly/ScopDetection.h > @@...

Hi Tobias, I have attached a patch file to optimize string operations in Polly-Detect pass. In this patch file, I put most of long string operations in the condition variable of "PollyViewMode" or in the DEBUG mode. Bests, Star Tan At 2013-07-22 22:27:48,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 07/22/2013 01:46 AM, Star Tan wrote: >> At

On 07/22/2013 01:46 AM, Star Tan wrote: > At 2013-07-22 12:16:53,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> I propose two more patches: >> >> 1) Transform the INVALID macro into function calls, that format >> the text and that set LastFailure. > Translating the INVALID macro into function calls would complicate the operations for