search for: optinion

...s, notice and warning. But it I run puppet without the -l option, I see the entries in /var/ log/messages. But there puppet makes no distiction between errors, warnings etc....: Nov 19 10:26:12 puppetd[28676]: Starting catalog run Nov 19 10:26:24 puppetd[28676]: (//Node[default]...Failed In my optinion it should be: Nov 19 10:26:24 puppetd[28676]: err: (//Node[default]...Failed or something similar. Is this a bug? BR, Rene -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups...

Hai Rowland, Maybe i didnt understand your reply that well, but why would you change it. All (linux) users have minimum_uid=1000 and start at 1000. All (windows) users (samba) are above minimum_uid=1000 So in my optinion, you should not be needed to change this. Unless your users start below 1000. Also cat /etc/adduser.conf shows ( For Debian/Buster ) # FIRST_[GU]ID to LAST_[GU]ID inclusive is the range of UIDs of dynamically # allocated user accounts/groups. FIRST_UID=1000 LAST_UID=29999 FIRST_GID=1000 LAST_...

...omrpession in very good compression SW 7-zip, which is faster and have higher compression ratio then bzip2 or rar. Currently its probalby the best compressor in therms of compression and decompression speed / compression ratio. In linux there is GNU lzma SW which implements lzma algorithm. In my optinion it would be very useful if rsync could use this compressor optionaly as upgrade of old zlib. more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lempel%E2%80%93Ziv%E2%80%93Markov_chain_algorithm

...'t really > answer my question, as short and unnuanced as it was. > > Why does a multi-homed DC lead to those things as a matter of course? Why, because people configure these things wrong. > > What's the underlying issue in Samba that leads to these problems? None im my optinion. > > Why can't Samba workaround the underlying issue to allow multi-homed DCs to function correctly? It can, if you configure your server correctly. In the "old way" use iproute and routing tables. In the new way use systemd-networking and setup per interface. Per exampl...

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba-technical > [mailto:samba-technical-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Rowland penny via samba-technical > Verzonden: donderdag 14 mei 2020 21:20 > Aan: samba-technical at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: DNS problem ubuntu server 20.04 > > On 14/05/2020 18:57, RickJC1 via samba-technical wrote: > > Hello

in my optinion, yes, i use my own packages for years now, started with 4.1.x  ( still the same servers) started with debian wheezy and these are now debian stretch.   Start reading here, it wil help you ;-) https://github.com/thctlo/samba4/tree/master/howtos      Greetz,   Louis   Van: Taylor Hammerling [mail...

...ttps://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/4034314/smbv1-is-not-installed-by-default-in-windows Imo, the longer you wait with samba AD the harder it gets to get things running. You could better spend you time on settting up and migrating to AD the keep putting time in a dying product. But thats my optinion. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Marco Shmerykowsky PE via samba > Verzonden: donderdag 24 mei 2018 15:46 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Windows 10 Client - Samba 3...

...20.04 > >> and you get this: > >> > >> tcp??????? 0????? 0 127.0.0.53:53 0.0.0.0:*?????????????? LISTEN > >> 451/systemd-resolve > >> > >> This would interfere with the AD dns server. > >> > > No, that a wrong understanding in my optinion. > > > > Per example. The client requests. > > On a client that doesn't run a separate dns server it will > work, I can prove this, but you can only run one server on port 53 on a Samba AD DC > and that server has to be either the internal dns server or Bind9. If &gt...

...implementation which is essentail when you use more than one operating system > I am not abusing anybody, I am just voicing my opinion and my opinion > is that anything written by 'you know who' has a lot of problems and > should be avoided like the plague. that's just your optinion > Why ? I hear you saying, well for an instance, download Fedora 24, > remove network-manager and setup a fixed ip, just like you can on > Debian by altering the files, reboot. You will find > that /etc/resolv.conf has disappeared and when you try to recreate it, > you will find you...

...> > Hai Rowland, > > > > Maybe i didnt understand your reply that well, but why > would you change it. > > > > All (linux) users have minimum_uid=1000 and start at 1000. > > All (windows) users (samba) are above minimum_uid=1000 > > > > So in my optinion, you should not be needed to change this. > > Unless your users start below 1000. > > > > Also cat /etc/adduser.conf shows ( For Debian/Buster ) > > > > # FIRST_[GU]ID to LAST_[GU]ID inclusive is the range of > UIDs of dynamically > > # allocated user account...

On 5/23/06, Michael Kiermaier <michael.kiermaier@gmx.net> wrote: > > > Another great thing would be a cuesheet-aware FLAC-plugin for XMMS. > > > > I agree. The difficulty in doing this is that you have to fight the > > one-file-one-track assumption that's built into xmms. There appears to > > be no clean solution, which is probably why it hasn't been

...ce is a good > > choice. > > > > Or not?! Better Not.. It may give some problems in the long run. Because if a "something" is using kerberos auth and it uses localhost, it may fail. Just prevent this, by setting the ip of dc, it really helps in the long run. So in my optinion, dont use localhost, use the ip of the DC itself for any regular DC of Member setup. I like to do it as followed. At install time, 2+ DC.s DC1 nameserver IP_OF_DC_FSMO. DC2 nameserver IP_OF_DC_FSMO. nameserver IP_OF_DC2 DC3 nameserver IP_OF_DC_FSMO. nameserver IP_OF_D3 When finished instal...

On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 1:43 PM Rowland penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 17/05/2020 19:30, Johannes Engel via samba wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > as I am currently planning a network with Samba AD DC I was wondering if > > you can recommend any best practice for a multi-homed AD DC. > > Best practise is: do not multi-home a DC. >

...e: > > Hai Rowland, > > > > Maybe i didnt understand your reply that well, but why > would you change it. > > > > All (linux) users have minimum_uid=1000 and start at 1000. > > All (windows) users (samba) are above minimum_uid=1000 > > > > So in my optinion, you should not be needed to change this. > > Unless your users start below 1000. > > > > Also cat /etc/adduser.conf shows ( For Debian/Buster ) > > > > # FIRST_[GU]ID to LAST_[GU]ID inclusive is the range of > UIDs of dynamically > > # allocated user accounts...

...s compaired with a client (remote) test. Again , localhost =! Hostname smbclient -L //hostname.fdqn smbclient -L //hostname Thats a test... Again what did i say in the previous mail. It all begins with correct resolving.. smbclient -L //localhost << works yes.. But correct, in my optinion not. > > Didn't notice that until after my first email, since it just so happened > that the user /accounts/ affected were all using Windows PCs when they > noticed the problem. > > > Now, last question, on the pc with the "unable to authenticate", any window...

...installed-by-default-in-windows > > > > Imo, the longer you wait with samba AD the harder it gets > to get things running. > > You could better spend you time on settting up and > migrating to AD the keep putting time in a dying product. > > > > But thats my optinion. > > > > Greetz, > > > > Louis > > > > > > > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > >> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > >> Marco Shmerykowsky PE via samba > >> Verzonden: donderdag 24 me...

Hi all, I am trying to detect association between a covariate and a disease outcome using R. This covariate shows time-varying effect, I add a time-covariate interaction item to build Cox model as follows: COX <- coxph(as.formula("Surv(TIME,outcome)~eGFR_BASE+eGFR_BASE:TIME"),ori.data); coef exp(coef) e(coef) z p eGFR_BASE

Am 06.08.2016 um 10:47 schrieb Rowland Penny: > On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 10:09:01 +0200 > Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: > >> Am 06.08.2016 um 08:53 schrieb Rowland Penny: >>> On Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:42:32 +0200 >>> Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Am 05.08.2016 um 14:18 schrieb

Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba In chel di` si favelave... > Try reading this: > http://www.itgeared.com/articles/1046-dns-client-settings-for-active/ I try to summarize. ''To be a DC'', servers have to add/update some DNS record. If you have a single DC, there's no choice. ;-) If you have more than a DC, you have to pay attention to have as DNS not the DC itself

I have an old setup that serves my purposes, but which I'll move over to a more modern Samba4 setup at some point. I know it's old, deprecated etc. In any case, at the moment I'm having a problem with two Windows 10 machines connecting to the domain I set up. The network is a mix of XP, Windows 7 and Windows 10 machines. Four (4) windows 10 machines connect to the domain after the