search for: opties

On Tue, 21 May 2024, Opty wrote: > Hello, > > can anyone confirm that OpenSSH server doesn't log client disconnect > without SSH_MSG_DISCONNECT? OpenSSH logs the disconnection regardless of whether the client sends SSH_MSG_DISCONNECT or just drops the connection. A little more information may be logged from the disconnect packet if it was sent, but there should always be a

On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 6:29?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > OpenSSH logs the disconnection regardless of whether the client sends > SSH_MSG_DISCONNECT or just drops the connection. > > A little more information may be logged from the disconnect packet > if it was sent, but there should always be a "Connection closed by ..." > message regardless. I

On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 1:24?PM Opty <opty77 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 3:14?PM Opty <opty77 at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 6:03?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > > We need to decide whether to promote these log messages to INFO. > > > > > > [...] > > > > I will wait for the final

On Fri, 14 Jun 2024, Opty wrote: > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 1:24?PM Opty <opty77 at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 3:14?PM Opty <opty77 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 6:03?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > > > We need to decide whether to promote these log messages to INFO. > > > > > >

On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 3:14?PM Opty <opty77 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 6:03?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Jun 2024, Opty wrote: > > > Indeed I am. > > > > > > What now? > > > > We need to decide whether to promote these log messages to INFO. > > > > > Should PuTTY change its

* Florian Bruhin <me at the-compiler.org> [2013-09-17 15:35:01 +0200]: > Heya, > > I recently bought an Opti-UPS[1] ValueSeries 575C and now I'm trying > to write a NUT driver for it. > [...] I started reading through all drivers using the same baudrate, and the powercom protocol and driver looked really familiar! I then got it to work by doing some minimal changes to

Hello, Some time ago i bought 2 OPTI UPS devices, but was really sad to see the page about the OPTI protocol on the nut page. But i don't wanted to give up :) So i sniffed the serial communication using the windows application/driver and found out that these PS (PowerSeries) devices are different than the ES series mentioned on the Nut page. They use some kind of ASCII protocol, with the

On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 10:50?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > On Fri, 14 Jun 2024, Opty wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2024 at 1:24?PM Opty <opty77 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 3:14?PM Opty <opty77 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 6:03?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > >

On Sun, 26 May 2024, Opty wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 6:29?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 21 May 2024, Opty wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > can anyone confirm that OpenSSH server doesn't log client disconnect > > > without SSH_MSG_DISCONNECT? > > > > OpenSSH logs the disconnection regardless of

On Wed, Jun 5, 2024 at 6:03?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > On Sat, 1 Jun 2024, Opty wrote: > > Indeed I am. > > > > What now? > > We need to decide whether to promote these log messages to INFO. > > > Should PuTTY change its 'perfectly OK to unceremoniously > > slam the connection shut when you're done' attitude? > >

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 3:03?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > On Wed, 29 May 2024, Opty wrote: > > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 4:18?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > > Yeah, you're adding a new thing that will be logged. IMO you should > > > try to figure out why the "Connection closed" message that is present > >

Heya, after I bought an OptiUPS VS 575C and discovering it won't work with Linux (silly me) I sniffed the protocol, found out it's very similiar to the protocol in the powercom driver, so I ended up adding support for that UPS to that driver. The patch is against the current git HEAD and works fine for me since weeks now. The shutdown sequence also works fine (on Archlinux). This is my

* Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> [2013-08-27 19:53:38 -0400]: > On Aug 26, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Florian Bruhin wrote: > > Also, what does the red color mean in the compability table? Anything > > that's not supported, or is it just "you have to solder your own cable > > but then you should be okay"? > > Technically, one star is "protocol

Hi! (first of all, FAQ tells me I should mention "queequeg" :P) I recently bought the UPS mentioned in the subject, assuming it'd work with Linux somehow, and the protocol will soon be something common -- turns out I was wrong. Website of the UPS: http://www.opti-ups.com/ -> USA -> Click on the big banner when it turns up (turns out I can't like to it directly, probably

On Aug 26, 2013, at 3:10 PM, Florian Bruhin wrote: > queequeg Subtlety is key :-) > It came with some "Sentinel" software for Windows. Hmm, not sure if this is similar to software we have seen before. > Also, what does the red color mean in the compability table? Anything > that's not supported, or is it just "you have to solder your own cable > but then you

On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 6:02?PM Opty <opty77 at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 3:03?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 29 May 2024, Opty wrote: > > > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 4:18?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > > > Yeah, you're adding a new thing that will be logged. IMO you should > >

Hi Jan, > I've been looking into how to make llvm bitcode files smaller. There is one > simple change that appears to shrink linked bitcode files by about 15%. See > this spreadsheet for some rough data: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjRrJHQc4_bddEtJdjdIek5fMDdIdFFIZldZXzdWa0E the improvement is wonderful! ... > In any case, the patch is attached if

On 18 July 2011 15:23, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > Looks like that break came > from http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=135154 > Judging by this ArrayRef ctor you should be able to simplify those calls by > changing the last two arguments from "&foo, 1" to, simply, "foo". I've done this in r135472. Jay.

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 10:12:47AM +0100, Jay Foad wrote: > On 18 July 2011 15:23, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > Looks like that break came > > from http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=rev&revision=135154 > > Judging by this ArrayRef ctor you should be able to simplify those calls by > > changing the last two arguments from

On Wed, 29 May 2024, Opty wrote: > On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 4:18?AM Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> wrote: > > Yeah, you're adding a new thing that will be logged. IMO you should > > try to figure out why the "Connection closed" message that is present > > in the debug log you sent is not making to to your syslog. > > If I change LogLevel in