search for: operation_

...orked with 'Base R'. As a point of reference and comparison, I set up a benchmarking and comparison package _well over half a decade ago_ and while it never get fully finished to the point of a submitted paper the vignette still stands---and demonstrates that _dropping in MKL is a one-line operation_. And always has been. There may have been some license arbitrage: Intel was an early investor in Revo, so MKL was pushed hard. With GotoBLAS and later OpenBLAS I cared less, but IIRC the license of MKL is a little simpler for "mere use" now. See https://cloud.r-project.org/web/packag...

...with 'Base R'. As a point of reference and comparison, I set up a benchmarking and comparison package _well over half a decade ago_ and while it never get fully finished to the point of a submitted paper the vignette still stands---and demonstrates that _dropping in MKL is a one-line operation_. And always has been. There may have been some license arbitrage: Intel was an early investor in Revo, so MKL was pushed hard. With GotoBLAS and later OpenBLAS I cared less, but IIRC the license of MKL is a little simpler for "mere use" now. See https://cloud.r-project.org/web...

On Mar 1, 2018, at 10:07 AM, Kaylor, Andrew <andrew.kaylor at intel.com> wrote: > So you don’t think sNaNs can just be treated as if they were qNaNs? I understand why we would want to ignore the signaling part of things, but the rules for operating on NaNs are pretty clear and reasonable to implement. The signaling aspect can, I think, be safely ignored when we are in the mode of assuming

Dear R Developers, First of all, I would like to thank you Jeroen Ooms for taking the binary Window Builds from Duncan. I firmly believe that the R Community will benefit a lot from his work. However, the debate I would like to open is about if some of Microsoft R Open Code shall be ported from R Open to Mainstream R. There are some beneficts in R Open such as multithreaded performance:

So you don’t think sNaNs can just be treated as if they were qNaNs? I understand why we would want to ignore the signaling part of things, but the rules for operating on NaNs are pretty clear and reasonable to implement. The signaling aspect can, I think, be safely ignored when we are in the mode of assuming the default FP environment. As for the distinction between IEEE and LLVM IR, I would