search for: openpgp_signature

...the Microsoft Interoperability Track on day 2. Looking forward to meet you there! -slow -- Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/ SerNet Samba Team Lead https://sernet.de/en/team-samba -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20230327/b6bca4e9/OpenPGP_signature.sig>

...https://samba.org/ SerNet Samba Team Lead https://sernet.de/en/ SAMBA+ Samba packages https://samba.plus/ SAMBA+ AIX Webinar https://samba.plus/samba-webinars -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20230714/1557cb60/OpenPGP_signature.sig>

...e are ready to assist and make your Samba eXPerience as smooth as possible. Looking forward to see you in G?ttingen! -Ralph -- SerNet Samba Team Lead https://sernet.de/ Samba Team Member https://samba.org/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20241001/bbf90609/OpenPGP_signature.sig>

...not after. I tried kdb5_util stash and it says it's using an existing key in the stash file, but I still get this same error. Help? Samba is 4.13.0 with mit-krb5 1.18.2 Thanks! -- Dan Egli On my Test server -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20201028/bad44e66/OpenPGP_signature.sig>

...l -bR) and retry. > I posted the getfacl output a minute or two ago. I tried killing any ACLs with setfacl -bR and the result was identical. NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED Next idea? :) -- Dan Egli On my Test server -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20201028/df4b9862/OpenPGP_signature.sig>

...dan //localhost/dan > cd test1 > put test.txt (SUCCESS) Why on earth would samba even CARE about group permissions when user permissions are perfectly fine? Help me fix this? -- Dan Egli On my Test server -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20201027/4a89becd/OpenPGP_signature.sig>

Hello, since we install the most recent windows updates from 07/2023 Test-ComputerSecureChannel -Verbose show False [4]. Moved the machine to local workgroup, deleted machine account on the ad controller and rejoined it (which works), but Test-ComputerSecureChannel -Verbose show again False. I'm not sure this is an issue on the samba or on the windows side. Affected samba versions so far:

...rmissions = no [printers] ??????? comment = All Printers ??????? path = /var/spool/samba ??????? browseable = no ??????? guest ok = no ??????? writable = no ??????? printable = yes -- Dan Egli On my Test server -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20201027/46f51e32/OpenPGP_signature.sig>

Hm, samba 4.11.2-13 is running on CentOS? 8. Im not really into CentOS/RH im more Debian/Ubuntu.. But I suggest you try this. Remove [homes] ( or keep it but add a new one. ) Setup [users] Path = /home browseable = yes read only = no Test again against that new share, but not with smbclient alone, setup a cifs mount and test and/or use a windows client pc. Preffered W10 or

...ch ? 26 BGB, einzelvertretungsberechtigt|Executive Board: Alexander Mauz, Sonja Wiekenberg-Mlalandle, Jens von Bargen VR 17651 Amtsgericht K?ln Spenden|Donations: IBAN DE90 4306 0967 4103 7264 00 BIC GENODEM1GLS -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 665 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20240709/f8e31504/OpenPGP_signature.sig>

...an't download daily.cvd from database.clamav.net why on earth could it not create a directory? The only share on this samba box is [HOMES], so I don't know what to do. Help? -- Dan Egli On my Test server -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20201026/d436f84c/OpenPGP_signature.sig>

...sks I set, but that's just a kludge. It shouldn't matter that the GROUP permissions are if the USER permissions allow access and the file is owned by the current user. Help? -- Dan Egli On my Test server -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20201028/fb5ffb3e/OpenPGP_signature.sig>

...nix and > Samba users ? > > Rowland > > Well excuse me! And to answer your question, the user dan exist in both the /etc/passwd file and in samba's user database. -- Dan Egli On my Test server -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 495 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20201028/d23dd196/OpenPGP_signature.sig>

On 16/01/2023 19:55, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Ah, ok, just saw it. Sorry, I missed that. > > I can only add then, all three DC's in my little net are installed with > bind 9.18 and working all the same without errors. That would tend to dispel my worries, so it is possible that it is some misconfiguration on Stefan's machine. I know I once joined a DC and forgot the

...tion on Stefan's machine. > > I know I once joined a DC and forgot the '--dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ' > option and then wondered why dns didn't work correctly. > > Rowland > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 203 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20230116/8c9e98f8/OpenPGP_signature.sig>

Hi, tanks for the answer. Since /proc/<PID>/stack is a stack the topmost element should be the task where it got stuck which is: rwsem_down_write_slowpath which waits for getting a write lock semaphore: cat /proc/10193/stack [<0>] rwsem_down_write_slowpath+0x2e2/0x620 [<0>] nfs_rmdir+0x117/0x1b0 [nfs] [<0>] vfs_rmdir+0x7c/0x1b0 [<0>] do_rmdir+0x216/0x230

Hi, all, I set smb2 max credits = 70 in smb.conf, but I find more than 200 read requests were sent to server in 3 seconds, and has no response during this period. Each read request's read len is 2MB, and they share the same "credit charge: 32". I want to restrict the read request number outstanding at the same time, i.e. client only send read request max to {max credits} before

...ow_bug.cgi?id=15261#c1 -slow -- Ralph Boehme, Samba Team https://samba.org/ SerNet Samba Team Lead https://sernet.de/en/team-samba SAMBA+ Samba packages https://samba.plus/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 840 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.samba.org/pipermail/samba/attachments/20230307/bbe8c978/OpenPGP_signature.sig>

On Sat, 2023-03-11 at 07:38 +0100, Ralph Boehme wrote: > On 3/11/23 04:33, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 2023-03-10 at 13:06 -0800, Ray Klassen via samba wrote: > > > I'm very interested in this. Can one of the devs elaborate on what has been > > > accomplished with this? Specifically, I'd like to know if the support is > > > bidirectional

Hi! Is it possible for windows to actually see and use symlinks on samba server? Windows NTFS does have notion of junctions and symbolic links, so when one open file A (which is a symbolic link), windows actually opens file B. Can such mechanism be used when A is on samba share? This is probably a protocol question more than samba question. Thanks, /mjt