search for: open_file_shar

...utables) the network trace (ethereal) shows up that oplocks are requested but not granted from linux servers I had a level 10 debug log on the samba server (the one below is a 2.0.10, the other is a 2.2.7) which shows (for what i'm able to read at this level :-] ) that an oplock is requested (open_file_shared ... oplock request = 3) but not granted (smb_flg = 136 - bit 5 (0x20) is not set) smb.conf includes the following lines for the given share oplocks = yes level2 oplocks = yes locking = yes is oplock a right clue ? can this problem come from somewhere else ? what ot...

T.D.Lee@durham.ac.uk wrote: > > > But we'd like to go one step further and have the return code from preexec > be used to continue or abort the connection being established. The script > above would be modified to generate this return code. > > Looking through the source code (smbd/service.c), it doesn't seem to check > the return code (calling smbrun to do the

...le.c:is_8_3(338) Checking Lab5Circuits.html for 8.3 [2002/05/13 15:40:24, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(113) unix_mode(Lab5Circuits.html) returning 0744 [2002/05/13 15:40:24, 5] smbd/files.c:file_new(107) allocated file structure 6273, fnum = 10369 (1 used) [2002/05/13 15:40:24, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared(656) open_file_shared: fname = Lab5Circuits.html, share_mode = 20041, ofun = 12, mode = 744, oplock request = 0 [2002/05/13 15:40:24, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1106) is_in_path: Lab5Circuits.html [2002/05/13 15:40:24, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1111) is_in_path: no name list. [2002/05/13 15:40...

...his 2 errors I found in the level 10 log when I try to copy a fresh copied file a second time on itself (permissions of test file are -r-xrw----, user and group match) Maybe the attribute mapping goes another path with acl support? 3.0.7 works fine. Daniel [2004/11/09 17:02:02, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(1038) open_file_shared: fname = bootfont.bin, dos_attrs = 27, share_mode = 41, ofun = 12, mode = 560, oplock request = 3 [2004/11/09 17:02:02, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode(283) dos_mode: bootfont.bin [2004/11/09 17:02:02, 8] smbd/dosmode.c:dos_mode_from_sbuf(151) dos_mode_from_sbuf returning...

...uest_oplock_break: no response received to oplock break request to pid 10448 on port 62848 for dev = 800008, inode = f56e 1998/09/09 16:29:11 request_oplock_break: broke oplock. get_share_modes Read share mode 0x20 pid=10448 get_share_modes: file with dev 8388616 inode 62830 -> 1 entries open_file_shared: breaking oplock (3) on file pdir/dvlp/products/Sales Tools/tlvns2.ppt, dev = 800008, inode = f56e 1998/09/09 16:29:11 request_oplock_break: sending a oplock break message to pid 10448 on port 62848 for dev = 800008, inode = f56e 1998/09/09 16:29:43 request_oplock_break: no response received...

...#39;ve experienced this problem on many different workstations. Looking at the logs, it seems to be a problem with oplocks; the part of the log that seems to apply is below. If anyone can help me with this problem, it would be greatly appreciated. log level 5: [1999/12/16 11:15:27, 5] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared(879) open_file_shared: breaking oplock (3) on file edi/install/status/status211.exe , dev = 341, inode = 1962023 [1999/12/16 11:15:27, 5] smbd/oplock.c:request_oplock_break(861) request_oplock_break: breaking our own oplock [1999/12/16 11:15:27, 3] smbd/oplock.c:oplock_break(583) oplock_b...

...ies: "The file Book1.xls already exists. Do you want to replace the existing file?". 5. Click "yes" and it works. So, in #3 above, it should have worked, but it didn't. No idea why. I ran a log level 10 on this and found these entries: [2003/10/20 15:51:16, 5] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(877) open_file_shared: create new requested for file test/Book1.xls and file already exists. [2003/10/20 15:51:16, 5] smbd/files.c:file_free(385) freed files structure 9281 (1 used) [2003/10/20 15:51:16, 10] smbd/trans2.c:set_bad_path_error(1785) set_bad_path_error: err = 17 bad_path = 0 [...

...rt(319) New file projects.INF [2004/10/15 10:24:52, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(Zwischenablage/Jaeger/pipe/projects.INF) returning 0777 [2004/10/15 10:24:52, 5] smbd/files.c:file_new(123) allocated file structure 9547, fnum = 13643 (3 used) [2004/10/15 10:24:52, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(808) open_file_shared: fname = Zwischenablage/Jaeger/pipe/projects.INF, share_mode = 40, ofun = 1, mode = 777, oplock request = 0 [2004/10/15 10:24:52, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1145) is_in_path: Zwischenablage/Jaeger/pipe/projects.INF [2004/10/15 10:24:52, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1150) is...

...x_mode(67) unix_mode(STS107/DEBUG10) inherit mode 40770 [2003/02/11 10:19:47, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(STS107/DEBUG10) returning 0760 [2003/02/11 10:19:47, 5] smbd/files.c:file_new(123) allocated file structure 4662, fnum = 8758 (1 used) [2003/02/11 10:19:47, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(782) open_file_shared: fname = STS107/DEBUG10, share_mode = 42, ofun = 12, mode = 760, oplock request = 0 [2003/02/11 10:19:47, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1145) is_in_path: STS107/DEBUG10 [2003/02/11 10:19:47, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1150) is_in_path: no name list. [2003/02/11 10:19:47, 3]...

...30 second delay and "Server exit (oplock break failure)" in the log.smbd. Here are some interesting bits from the logs and dump so you don't have to download the whole log if you don't want to. Here is the initial request in the log.smbd: [2002/06/12 17:15:40, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared(650) open_file_shared: fname = marketing/Slicks/Components/servericon.cdr, share_mode = 8040, ofun = 1, mode = 664, oplock request = 3 [2002/06/12 17:15:40, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1115) is_in_path: marketing/Slicks/Components/servericon.cdr [2002/06/12 17:15:40, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_pat...

...; drivers -> add and tries to add the above mentioned driver. Some files are then being copied to the samba server, but then copying stops with a message "Access Denied". The (reproducible) problem is a file which is tried to be copied to W32X86/: [2005/09/07 13:12:28, 5] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(1148) open_file_shared: read/write access requested for file W32X86/SET12.tmp on read only file [2005/09/07 13:12:28, 5] smbd/files.c:file_free(439) freed files structure 9190 (0 used) [2005/09/07 13:12:28, 10] smbd/trans2.c:set_bad_path_error(2191) set_bad_path_error: err = 13 bad_path =...

...plock_break: no fsp found for our own oplock [2005/03/04 12:25:05, 0] lib/util.c:smb_panic2(1490) BACKTRACE: 14 stack frames: #0 smbd(smb_panic2+0x1b6) [0x81cdf1a] #1 smbd(smb_panic+0x19) [0x81cdd62] #2 smbd(request_oplock_break+0x1d5) [0x81fca07] #3 smbd [0x80bf613] #4 smbd(open_file_shared1+0x801) [0x80c08ce] #5 smbd(open_file_shared+0x51) [0x80c00cb] #6 smbd(reply_open_and_X+0x2bc) [0x80a14c4] #7 smbd [0x80d04c4] #8 smbd [0x80d0574] #9 smbd(process_smb+0x1eb) [0x80d08b9] #10 smbd(smbd_process+0x170) [0x80d149c] #11 smbd(main+0x7d4) [0x8240f8c] #12 /...

Prior to upgrading from RH7.0 to RH7.3 our Samba filserver worked perfectly. Now we are having locking problems. Initially Iused the same samba binaries built on RH70, I tried rebuilding Samba and reinstalling but it had no effect. If user bon opens an M$-Office file they frequently get a 'file is already in use by bob'. Sure enough smbstatus -L shows the file locked by bob, but bob

.../02/24 15:53:42, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(111) unix_mode(Saranes_Documents/NJC/Invoices/NJC Invoice25 R001.xls) returning 0744 [2003/02/24 15:53:42, 3] lib/util.c:unix_clean_name(387) unix_clean_name [Saranes_Documents/NJC/Invoices/NJC Invoice25 R001.xls] [2003/02/24 15:53:42, 4] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared(778) calling open_file with flags=0x0 flags2=0x0 mode=0744 [2003/02/24 15:53:42, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(213) brigitte opened file Saranes_Documents/NJC/Invoices/NJC Invoice25 R001.xls read=Yes write=No (numopen=2) [2003/02/24 15:53:42, 3] smbd/oplock_linux.c:linux_set_kernel_oplock(182) s...

...422) Share violation on file (4,1,2,28171,Brigittes Documents/Work/Invoices/A13C0000,fcbopen = 0, flags = 0) = 0 [2003/02/24 09:30:06, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(213) brigitte opened file Brigittes Documents/Work/Invoices/A13C0000 read=Yes write=No (numopen=3) [2003/02/24 09:30:06, 4] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared(762) open_file_shared : share_mode deny - calling open_file with flags=0x0 flags2=0x0 mode=0744 returned 1 [2003/02/24 09:30:06, 5] smbd/files.c:file_free(338) freed files structure 7206 (2 used) [2003/02/24 09:30:06, 3] smbd/error.c:error_packet(91) error string = Operation not permitted [...

Sorry, My mistake it didn't fix the problem. (I was running the application from the c:\ drive rather than the share). I am getting exactly the same errors in the log: unix_clean_name [common/config/.root.passwords] [2002/02/21 11:15:44, 4] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared(779) calling open_file with flags=0x0 flags2=0x0 mode=0644 [2002/02/21 11:15:44, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(216) INSTALL opened file common/config/.root.passwords read=Yes write=No (numopen=1 0) [2002/02/21 11:15:44, 3] smbd/posix_acls.c:unpack_nt_owners(443) unpack_nt_owners: unable to valid...

...) [1999/04/20 14:52:23, 8] ../source/lib/util.c:(2432) is_in_path: notes/data [1999/04/20 14:52:23, 8] ../source/lib/util.c:(2437) is_in_path: no name list. [1999/04/20 14:52:23, 3] ../source/lib/util.c:(609) unix_clean_name [notes/data] [1999/04/20 14:52:23, 10] ../source/smbd/open.c:(784) open_file_shared: fname = notes/data, share_mode = 42, ofun = 1, mode = 640, oplock request = 3 [1999/04/20 14:52:23, 4] ../source/smbd/open.c:(954) calling open_file with flags=0x2 flags2=0x0 mode=0640 [1999/04/20 14:52:23, 5] ../source/smbd/files.c:(173) allocated fd_ptr structure (4 used) [1999/04/20 14:52...

...me.c:unix_convert(388) conversion finished inoupd -> inoupd [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 3] smbd/dosmode.c:unix_mode(110) unix_mode(inoupd) returning 0660 [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 5] smbd/files.c:file_new(122) allocated file structure 9316, fnum = 13412 (1 used) [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 10] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared1(838) open_file_shared: fname = inoupd, share_mode = 8040, ofun = 1, mode = 660, oplock request = 3 [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1474) is_in_path: inoupd [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 8] lib/util.c:is_in_path(1478) is_in_path: no name list. [2004/03/05 19:23:33, 3] lib/util.c:unix...

.../smbd(smb_panic+0xfc) [0x81806f0] #1 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd [0x8171fc3] #2 /lib/libc.so.6 [0x402254f8] #3 /usr/local/samba/lib/vfs/vscan-mksd.so [0x40737c00] #4 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd [0x80a9e95] #5 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd [0x80aa165] #6 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd(open_file_shared1+0x3f6) [0x80ab69a] #7 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd(open_file_shared+0x28) [0x80ab2a0] #8 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd(reply_open_and_X+0x162) [0x80964ce] #9 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd [0x80b8161] #10 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd [0x80b82c1] #11 /usr/local/samba/sbin/smbd(process...

...ns. If I drag-and-drop a file in Windows Explorer from a directory on the NT box to a share on the Linux box, I intermittantly receive the error message "Cannot copy [file]: Access is denied." If I check the Samba logfile (log level 4), I see this: [2001/12/04 04:58:29, 4] smbd/open.c:open_file_shared(784) calling open_file with flags=0x1 flags2=0x240 mode=0764 [2001/12/04 04:58:29, 2] smbd/open.c:open_file(214) kasper opened file tmp/schiff16.bin read=No write=Yes (numopen=2) [2001/12/04 04:58:29, 2] smbd/close.c:close_normal_file(206) kasper closed file tmp/schiff16.bin (numopen=1) [20...