search for: only_prefix

...nm+awk+sed to pick out the symbols starting with LLVM * build LLVM-C.so using a -reexport_library linker option I'm thinking that maybe we could make this not-darwin-specific by making use of utils/extract_symbols.py: * edit extract_symbols.py to add a --only_unmangled option (or maybe --only_prefix=LLVM or something like that) * on non-darwin use that instead of the existing command to get the symbols to export (or: make extract_symbols.py work on Darwin) * instead of building LLVM-C.so from LLVM.so using this -reexport_library option, instead build LLVM-C.so from the same libraries t...

...> * build LLVM-C.so using a -reexport_library linker option > > > > I'm thinking that maybe we could make this not-darwin-specific by making > > use of utils/extract_symbols.py: > > * edit extract_symbols.py to add a --only_unmangled option (or maybe > > --only_prefix=LLVM or something like that) > > * on non-darwin use that instead of the existing command to get the > > symbols to export (or: make extract_symbols.py work on Darwin) > > * instead of building LLVM-C.so from LLVM.so using this > -reexport_library > > option, inst...

...> >>> > I'm thinking that maybe we could make this not-darwin-specific by > >>> > making > >>> > use of utils/extract_symbols.py: > >>> > * edit extract_symbols.py to add a --only_unmangled option (or maybe > >>> > --only_prefix=LLVM or something like that) > >>> > * on non-darwin use that instead of the existing command to get the > >>> > symbols to export (or: make extract_symbols.py work on Darwin) > >>> > * instead of building LLVM-C.so from LLVM.so using this > >...

...option >>> > >>> > I'm thinking that maybe we could make this not-darwin-specific by >>> > making >>> > use of utils/extract_symbols.py: >>> > * edit extract_symbols.py to add a --only_unmangled option (or maybe >>> > --only_prefix=LLVM or something like that) >>> > * on non-darwin use that instead of the existing command to get the >>> > symbols to export (or: make extract_symbols.py work on Darwin) >>> > * instead of building LLVM-C.so from LLVM.so using this >>> > -reexp...

...#39;m thinking that maybe we could make this not-darwin-specific by >> >>> > making >> >>> > use of utils/extract_symbols.py: >> >>> > * edit extract_symbols.py to add a --only_unmangled option (or >> maybe >> >>> > --only_prefix=LLVM or something like that) >> >>> > * on non-darwin use that instead of the existing command to get the >> >>> > symbols to export (or: make extract_symbols.py work on Darwin) >> >>> > * instead of building LLVM-C.so from LLVM.so using th...

Hello list! So I'm wondering if there is a will to ship a DLL with the C API exported? LLVM currently ships with LTO.dll which has some C api functions exported, made from the export file tools/lto/lto.exports, so it would not be the first DLL LLVM shipped. Currently I (and the users of my project[1]) are building it ourselves using this script[2] derived from the LLVMSharp script[3]. Which