search for: onlt

...mm0 # Vector Folded Reload [...] movaps %xmm0, 16(%rsp) # Vector Spill [...] unpcklps 32(%rsp), %xmm0 # Vector Folded Reload How is this possibly legal? First we spill %xmm0 (a 32-bit value) to a stack slot that's onlt 16 bits wide (the next $rsp offsets are 48 and 16). Then we load 64 bits from 32(%rsp) via unpcklps and consider it a reload of the spill. This seems really wrong. Can someone explain? -Dave

At 03:28 30/04/97, ihaka at stat.auckland.ac.nz wrote: >Bill Venables writes: > (As a complete side-issue, Brian Ripley and I have a kind of > convention: we refer to the language as "S" and the commercial > product as "S-PLUS". There is a useful distinction to be made.) > >This is generally what I try to do too. > >However, I suspect though that most

Hi, Firstly, system info: Linux mysystem 2.6.18-53.1.4.el5 #1 SMP Fri Nov 30 00:45:55 EST 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I am running ldap on Centos with packages openldap-2.3.27-8.el5_2.4 y openldap-2.3.27-8.el5_2.4 I'd want to perform a query that return one attribute. So I did something as follows: ldapsearch -W -f qbis.ldif -D "cn=Manager,dc=palermo,dc=edu" -b

...hows local machine groups and will not display the Domain groups, or give me the option to view domain users. However, if I manually type in a domain user or group e.g. \\DOMAIN1\bill.bloggs I am able to assign rights to that entity. Can anyone give me clues as to what might be amiss here, the onlt info I've found so far applies to Samba 2.something and was supposed to fixed a while ago. smb.conf is given below:- [global] unix charset = LOCALE workgroup = OURDOMAIN netbios name = STAFF_SAMBA interfaces = eth0, lo bind interfaces only = Yes ldap passwd sync = Yes passdb backend = ldap...

...vil. The client is now running OS-evil. When OS-evil is asked for a file by a clean program, it will produce the clean version, but will produce the evil version for most operations. Rsync-clean running on the client might ask for all the client files to deliver to the server, but OS-evil would onlt give rsync clean (although inactive) versions of the files to send out. Rsync would not report -evil versions of the files or executables because it could not find out about them. So any security checks based on what rsync delivers to the server would be unreliable. Granted, it would be a lot of...