search for: ominously

Hello, Yesterday I posted about how to email from a worker. I decided to be a bit piggy and just inhale all of rails. Sorted. I am noticing some rather ominous behavior though. The setup: My worker takes an uploaded image as a param and passes it (via system call) to a C++ image processing engine. Take a look at these memory consumption figures for successive runs uploading the identical image

I''m currently running snv_76 on my laptop to run a windows XP hvm domU. Everything has been working great until recently when I started getting the following messages during boot (from dmesg): Dec 11 16:31:19 pdlaptop xenstored: [ID 702911 daemon.error] Checking store ... Dec 11 16:31:19 pdlaptop xenstored: [ID 702911 daemon.error] Checking store complete. Dec 11 16:31:19 pdlaptop

Hi I have an ocfs2 volume (1.4.1) on lvm2, which is made available on 2 nodes via dual primary drbd that is on it. I wanted to backup my volume, so naturally I made a snapshot of it via the lvm2, and tried to mount it for backing up. However, I got the following error in dmesg : [319981.478168] (23483,0):ocfs2_fill_super:700 ERROR: Unable to create per-mount debugfs root. I then searched

On 26/09/2018 08:34, Aki Tuomi wrote: > # before current passbd > passdb { > driver = passwd-file > args = username_format=%Lu /etc/dovecot/aliases > } > > # into /etc/dovecot/aliases > alias at user:::::::user=real_username noauthenticate > > This hopefully works. > > Aki This does appear to work, thanks! As an optimization of the alias

I have recently acquired a new laptop. (My old one was giving me ominous messages on boot-up, about possible hard drive problems.) I want to get everything running "just as it was" on the old laptop (So that I can stay in my comfort zone). In particular, I would like to do command line editing with vi syntax, which is what I am used to. I cannot for the life of me remember how I told

I'm not sure if this has much significance or not -- but it sounds rather ominous. It doesn't appear to be new as it happens with 2.0.0 in Linux (but the formatting of the warning messages has improved). > contour(array(3e10, c(10,10), list(1:10, 11:20))) Warning: stack imbalance in 'contour', 20 then 24 Warning: stack imbalance in '.Internal', 19 then 23 Warning:

> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: roxygen-devel-bounces at lists.r-forge.r-project.org [mailto:roxygen- > devel-bounces at lists.r-forge.r-project.org] Im Auftrag von Vinh Nguyen > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 4. November 2010 04:04 > An: roxygen-devel at r-forge.wu-wien.ac.at > Betreff: Re: [Roxygen-devel] Roxygen: @example tag does not work for me > > Try @examples

Maybe https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6235034/vi-keybindings-for-r-command-line-like-in-bash ?? (tl;dr "set editing-mode vi" or "set keymap vi" in .inputrc ... ) On 11/25/24 20:09, Rolf Turner wrote: > > > I have recently acquired a new laptop. (My old one was giving me > ominous messages on boot-up, about possible hard drive problems.) > > I

Hi, LLVM provides basic graph traversal for its CFGs, but I need additional operations, such as iterating over the edges. I thought I would solve this problem using the Boost graph library. It should be relatively simple to walk an LLVM CFG and add the BasicBlock objects to a Boost graph declared as: typedef boost::directed_graph<llvm::BasicBlock> Graph; Once constructed, this

Hi developers, I would like to propose making a release soon from the current NUT trunk. There have been a lot of important changes since 2.0.5: new drivers added/refined (e.g. megatec_usb); the switch to Automake; the renaming of newhidups to usbhid-ups; automatic installation of hotplugging files; IPv6 support; improvements to the tripplite_usb driver; improvements to the gamatronic driver;

After changing from 2.x to 3.0 I get these messages: rpc_server/srv_util.c:get_domain_user_groups(376) get_domain_user_groups: primary gid of user [fred] is not a Domain group ! get_domain_user_groups: You should fix it, NT doesn't like that I understand why this is: fred's group needs to be mapped like so net groupmap modify ntgroup="Domain Users" unixgroup=<fred's

Dear R-devel friends: I'm back to bother you again about the conflict between mclapply and tcltk. I've been monitoring several packages that want to use mclapply to parallelize computations and need to figure out what should be done. It appears tcltk cannot be safely unloaded, so the best we can do is check for the presence of tcltk and stop if it is found before mclapply() is used. I

Hello list, I've been working on a package of my own. It works fine on the 32bit linux machines that I've tested it on. Someone using 64bit ubuntu wanted to try it, and surprising segfaults happened. My test code results in no segfault, errors, or leaks from my calls when run under valgrind (I recompiled R with the level 2 valgrind instruments). R and packages are compiled from source,

On the Bombings Noam Chomsky The terrorist attacks were major atrocities. In scale they may not reach the level of many others, for example, Clinton's bombing of the Sudan with no credible pretext, destroying half its pharmaceutical supplies and killing

It's going to be really hard to do something sane in the current infrastructure. Its possible, but it would also be slow. You would have to go looking at uses of variables compared in predicates in PropagateEquality and if the uses appear in a comparison that is dominated by the true or false edge of the existing predicate, see if it tells you something about the dominated one. On Mon, Jul

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69029 Priority: medium Bug ID: 69029 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: GT218 (NVA8): GPU lockup since kernel 3.11 upgrade QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: fred at

>>>>> PIKAL Petr <petr.pikal at precheza.cz> >>>>> on Fri, 20 Oct 2017 06:33:36 +0000 writes: > Hi > Keep your messages in the list, you increase your chance to get some answer. > I changed your data to groupedData object (see below), but I did not find any problem in it. > plot(wlg) > gives reasonable picture and I am

Sure On Mon, Jul 4, 2016, 9:40 AM Carlos Liam <carlos at aarzee.me> wrote: > It looks like there's already something similar in PropagateEquality which > eg X >= Y == true and replaces X < Y == false, which is somewhat similar - > could I base an addition off of that? > > > - CL > > On Jul 3, 2016, at 7:13 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org>

On 25 March 2010 20:04, Trevor Harmon <trevor.w.harmon at nasa.gov> wrote: > > So why exactly is BasicBlock's copy constructor private? The ominous > "Do not implement" warning leads me to think there is some sort of > design issue that is preventing a copy constructor here. Is there any > possibility of working around it? > I think the problem is that LLVM

On 01/16/2017 05:04 PM, Fam Zheng wrote: > This series implements the proposed fc_host feature of virtio-scsi. > > The first patch updates the data structure changes according to the spec > proposal; the second patch actually implements the operations. > > Fam Zheng (2): > virtio_scsi: Add fc_host definitions > virtio_scsi: Implement fc_host > >