search for: omin

Hello, Yesterday I posted about how to email from a worker. I decided to be a bit piggy and just inhale all of rails. Sorted. I am noticing some rather ominous behavior though. The setup: My worker takes an uploaded image as a param and passes it (via system call) to a C++ image processing engine. Take a look at these memory consumption figures for successive runs uploading the identical image each time: All figures in megabytes 343 C++ image proces...

I''m currently running snv_76 on my laptop to run a windows XP hvm domU. Everything has been working great until recently when I started getting the following messages during boot (from dmesg): Dec 11 16:31:19 pdlaptop xenstored: [ID 702911 daemon.error] Checking store ... Dec 11 16:31:19 pdlaptop xenstored: [ID 702911 daemon.error] Checking store complete. Dec 11 16:31:19 pdlaptop

...ocking down the cluster So I searched a bit and found that there was a patch suggestion for ?--force option to tunefs, http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2008-July/002447.html and that it was rejected, http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2008-July/002449.html and some ominous warnings, http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/ocfs2-devel/2008-July/002450.html o well... now how am I supposed to backup my live ocfs2 volume? Make a virtual machine that will have just that snapshot device? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:...

...set the "noauthenticate" flag. Does override_fields only override fields that have already been set? Finally, the dovecot debug log logs the statement "Allowing any password" before logging "Not performing authentication (noauthenticate set)" which sounds somewhat ominous, but this may just be a product of the way "noauthenticate" is implemented? -- Eirik

I'm not sure if this has much significance or not -- but it sounds rather ominous. It doesn't appear to be new as it happens with 2.0.0 in Linux (but the formatting of the warning messages has improved). > contour(array(3e10, c(10,10), list(1:10, 11:20))) Warning: stack imbalance in 'contour', 20 then 24 Warning: stack imbalance in '.Internal', 19 th...

...code > #' my R code Hi Vinh, thanks for the reply. What you suggest works just fine. It's not the thing I'm looking for, though, since it means I have to "hard code" my examples to the actual script. That's exactly what I'm trying to get around. And there is this ominous "@example" tag that should get the job done, I just don't get how ;-) Thanks for your comment though! Regards, Janko > > I'm not sure if placing a relative path (tests/foo.R) would work...try > placing the actual code in the documentation chunk. > ______________...

...id operator=(const BasicBlock &); // Do not implement ... } This causes a slew of errors related to Boost trying to call the copy constructor and failing. Making the copy constructor public causes the errors to disappear. So why exactly is BasicBlock's copy constructor private? The ominous "Do not implement" warning leads me to think there is some sort of design issue that is preventing a copy constructor here. Is there any possibility of working around it? Thanks, Trevor

...ke; the renaming of newhidups to usbhid-ups; automatic installation of hotplugging files; IPv6 support; improvements to the tripplite_usb driver; improvements to the gamatronic driver; memory leaks and other bugs fixed; improvements to the powerpanel driver; etc. I know we are all waiting for the ominous 2.2.0 mega-super-rewrite, but the loftier the goal, the less likely it is to happen soon. Meanwhile, I propose that we should make unstable releases (such as 2.0.6) more frequently, at least every 3 months or so. With Automake, this is a matter of a few simple steps: * editing NEWS * updating t...

...r are now the wrong group. My questions are: Is there a clean solution using the smbpasswd file password backend and keeping the group-per-user plan? If I bite the bullet and go to ldapsam or tdbsam does that help? Do I even need to worry about this? "NT doesn't like that" sounds ominous, but everything seems to work. My clients are mainly W2K if that matters. Thanks.

...(!require(parallel)) stop ("parallel wouldn't load") checkForTcltk() example(mclapply) } ## test that: checkForTcltk() MCLApply() library(tcltk) checkForTcltk() ## Why can't tcltk just be unloaded? I don't understand, but it is a deep ## problem. ## Consider the ominous warnings in R detach's help: ## ## "Unloading some namespaces has undesirable side effects: e.g. ## unloading ?grid? closes all graphics devices, and on most systems ## ?tcltk? cannot be reloaded once it has been unloaded and may crash ## R if this is attempted." (Note: section...

...om source, so this is hopefully not a debian/ubuntu issue. I'm totally stumped and hoping that this is a silly / common 32 to 64 bit transition issue. The problem seems to come when I attempt to access a function registered by the Matrix package. During compilation (on 64 bit only) I get the ominous: -------------- slim_stolen_from_matrix.c: In function ?R_as_cholmod_sparse?: slim_stolen_from_matrix.c:36: warning: implicit declaration of function ?R_GetCCallable? slim_stolen_from_matrix.c:36: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size -------------- The function in question i...

...In short, the crime is a gift to the hard jingoist right, those who hope to use force to control their domains. That is even putting aside the likely US actions, and what they will trigger -- possibly more attacks like this one, or worse. The prospects ahead are even more ominous than they appeared to be before the latest atrocities. As to how to react, we have a choice. We can express justified horror; we can seek to understand what may have led to the crimes, which means making an effort to enter the minds of the likely perpetrators. If we choose...

It's going to be really hard to do something sane in the current infrastructure. Its possible, but it would also be slow. You would have to go looking at uses of variables compared in predicates in PropagateEquality and if the uses appear in a comparison that is dominated by the true or false edge of the existing predicate, see if it tells you something about the dominated one. On Mon, Jul 4, 2016, 8:23 AM Carlos Liam <carlos at aarzee.me> wrote: > That seems ominous; should I not bother? > > - CL > > On Jul 3, 2016, at 5:58 PM, Daniel B...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69029 Priority: medium Bug ID: 69029 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: GT218 (NVA8): GPU lockup since kernel 3.11 upgrade QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: Linux (All) Reporter: fred at

..., -1e-7) which may be best for pure back compatibility, but I really don't like it either : The famous logit - transform log( z / (1-z)) is really anti-symmetric around z = 1/2 , in particular should treat 0 and 1 "symmetrically" and I find it ugly that the previous fixup (our two ominous lines) is not at all symmetric wrt 1/2, notably the 2nd transformation is made unconditionally but the first one not. Fortunately, the same source file, <R>/src/library/stats/R/zzzModels.R also defines the SSfpl() == 4-parameter logistic model and there, the 'init' function ne...

...> > It's going to be really hard to do something sane in the current > infrastructure. > Its possible, but it would also be slow. You would have to go looking at > uses of variables compared in predicates in PropagateEquality and if the > uses appear in a comparison that is dominated by the true or false edge of > the existing predicate, see if it tells you something about the dominated > one. > > > On Mon, Jul 4, 2016, 8:23 AM Carlos Liam <carlos at aarzee.me> wrote: > >> That seems ominous; should I not bother? >> >> - CL >&gt...

On 25 March 2010 20:04, Trevor Harmon <trevor.w.harmon at nasa.gov> wrote: > > So why exactly is BasicBlock's copy constructor private? The ominous > "Do not implement" warning leads me to think there is some sort of > design issue that is preventing a copy constructor here. Is there any > possibility of working around it? > I think the problem is that LLVM deals largely in pointer types, so things like BasicBlock are...

...ts on the guest each having the _same_ WWPN/WWNN), or a single host presenting all LUNs, making the WWPN setting ... interesting. Overall, I'm not overly happy with this approach. You already added WWPN ids to the virtio transport, so why didn't you update the LUN field, too, to avoid this ominous LUN remapping? And we really should make sure to have a single FC host in the guest presenting all LUNs. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare at suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild,...

...86_64) bits in epel-testing, so you could get it from there and update to the fully tested version when it is released. In general I think it is most important to keep your signatures current. I don't get the sense that the changes between [sub-]point-releases are earth shattering (despite the ominous warning that you will see in your logs).

I'm seeing these with latest 1.0-stable : Feb 27 16:48:12 zamok dovecot: POP3(****): mbox sync: UID inserted in the middle of mailbox /var/mail/**** (176 > 150) Feb 27 16:49:58 zamok dovecot: POP3(****): mbox sync: UID inserted in the middle of mailbox /var/mail/**** (4409 > 4237) Feb 27 16:50:04 zamok dovecot: IMAP(****): mbox sync: UID inserted in the middle of mailbox