search for: ol1

...86,21 @@ static int ptwr_emulated_update( if ( !okay ) { unmap_domain_page(pl1e); - put_page_from_l1e(gl1e_to_ml1e(d, nl1e), d); + put_page_from_l1e(nl1e, d); return X86EMUL_CMPXCHG_FAILED; } } else { ol1e = *pl1e; - if ( !UPDATE_ENTRY(l1, pl1e, ol1e, nl1e, page_to_mfn(page), v) ) + if ( !UPDATE_ENTRY(l1, pl1e, ol1e, nl1e, mfn, v) ) BUG(); } unmap_domain_page(pl1e); /* Finally, drop the old PTE. */ - put_page_from_l1e(gl1e_to_ml1e(d, ol1e), d); + p...

...pte_t *)(_p), \ + update_intpte(&_t ## e_get_intpte(*(_p)), \ _t ## e_get_intpte(_o), _t ## e_get_intpte(_n), \ (_m), (_v)) @@ -2498,7 +2498,7 @@ static int create_grant_pte_mapping( } ol1e = *(l1_pgentry_t *)va; - if ( !UPDATE_ENTRY(l1, va, ol1e, nl1e, mfn, v) ) + if ( !UPDATE_ENTRY(l1, (l1_pgentry_t *)va, ol1e, nl1e, mfn, v) ) { put_page_type(page); rc = GNTST_general_error; @@ -3278,7 +3278,7 @@ static int ptwr_emulated_update( intpte_t t = ol...

...l1_pgentry_t _nl1e, struct domain *d, struct exec_domain *ed) { @@ -1984,30 +1986,32 @@ int update_grant_va_mapping(unsigned lon */ int rc = 0; - l1_pgentry_t *pl1e; - unsigned long _ol1e; + l1_pgentry_t *pl1e; + l1_pgentry_t _ol1e; cleanup_writable_pagetable(d); pl1e = &linear_pg_table[l1_linear_offset(va)]; - if ( unlikely(__get_user(_ol1e, (unsigned long *)pl1e) != 0) ) + if ( unlikely(__copy_from_user(&_ol1e, pl1e, sizeof(_ol1e)) != 0)...

...ue "RowID". The second column contains the "Variable" of interest. The remaining 100 columns ("Overlap1" ... "Overlap100") each contain a row ID that overlaps this row (but if this row overlaps fewer than 100 other rows then the remainder of the columns "OL1...OL100" contain NA). Here's the problem: I need to select the subset of 500 independent rows that maximizes the mean and minimizes the stdev of "Variable". Clearly this requires iterative selection and comparison of rows, because each newly-selected row must be compared to row...

...OM0: (file=mm.c, line=1688) Bad type (saw 28000001 != exp e0000000) for mfn 96efe (pfn 573) (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=606) Error getting mfn 96efe (pfn 573) from L1 entry 0000000096efe027 for dom8 (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=1266) Bad get_page_from_l1e(): pl1e = fefa6a30, nl1e = 96efe027, ol1e = 0, gl1mfn = d8538 (XEN) DOM0: (file=mm.c, line=2283) Could not modify L1 entry: va == fefa6a30, l1e == 96efe027, mfn == d8538 (I''ve added the two MEM_LOG() calls at line 1266 and 2283.) Any ideas where I should begin looking? Or is PAE support languishing? -- Randy ______________...

...against, this way we can fully integrate it into out network with all the OS types we have. Does anyone have ny experience with this sort of set up? What do people recommend? -- Thanks, Andrew McCall Internet/Linux System Administrator I.C.T. Division Oldham MBC Civic Centre West Street Oldham OL1 1UU Tel : 0161 911 3990 Fax : 0161 911 3998 Email : it.andrew.mccall@oldham.gov.uk ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are add...

...oot wheel 15 Sep 5 09:25 libnss_wins.so -> ./nss_wins.so.1 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15 Sep 5 09:26 libnss_wins.so.1 -> ./nss_wins.so.1 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15 Sep 5 09:26 libnss_wins.so.2 -> ./nss_wins.so.1 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16696 Jul 14 14:29 nss_winbind.ol1 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18 Sep 5 09:30 nss_winbind.so -> ./nss_winbind.so.1 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18232 Sep 5 09:13 nss_winbind.so.1 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18 Sep 5 09:30 nss_winbind.so.2 -> ./nss_winbind.so.1 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18232 Aug 28 18:23 nss_winbind....

...oot wheel 15 Sep 5 09:25 libnss_wins.so -> ./nss_wins.so.1 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15 Sep 5 09:26 libnss_wins.so.1 -> ./nss_wins.so.1 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15 Sep 5 09:26 libnss_wins.so.2 -> ./nss_wins.so.1 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 16696 Jul 14 14:29 nss_winbind.ol1 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18 Sep 5 09:30 nss_winbind.so -> ./nss_winbind.so.1 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18232 Sep 5 09:13 nss_winbind.so.1 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18 Sep 5 09:30 nss_winbind.so.2 -> ./nss_winbind.so.1 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18232 Aug 28 18:23 nss_winbind....

...node1.X.rd run.node2.X.rd ( X ranging from 0000 to infinite ) Curiously stor1data and stor2data maintain similar ratios in bytes: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sdc1 52737613824 17079174264 35658439560 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 -> stor1data /dev/sdc1 52737613824 17118810848 35618802976 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 -> stor2data However the ratio on som3data differs too much (1TB): Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sdc1 52737613824 154791...

...anging from 0000 to infinite ) > > Curiously stor1data and stor2data maintain similar ratios in bytes: > > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available > Use% Mounted on > /dev/sdc1 52737613824 17079174264 35658439560 33% > /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 -> stor1data > /dev/sdc1 52737613824 17118810848 35618802976 33% > /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 -> stor2data > > However the ratio on som3data differs too much (1TB): > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available > Use% Mounted on > /dev/s...

...ously stor1data and stor2data maintain similar ratios in bytes: >> >> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available >> Use% Mounted on >> /dev/sdc1 52737613824 17079174264 <(707)%20917-4264> >> 35658439560 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 -> stor1data >> /dev/sdc1 52737613824 17118810848 35618802976 33% >> /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 -> stor2data >> >> However the ratio on som3data differs too much (1TB): >> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available >> Use...

Hi Keir: These two patches remove the need for netloop by performing the copying in netback and only if it is necessary. The rationale is that most packets will be processed without delay allowing them to be freed without copying at all. So instead of copying every packet destined to dom0 we''ll only copy those that linger longer than a specified amount of time (currently 0.5s). As it

...sequence of commands to add the new node was: gluster peer probe stor3data gluster volume add-brick volumedisk0 stor3data:/mnt/disk_b1/glusterfs/vol0 gluster volume add-brick volumedisk0 stor3data:/mnt/disk_b2/glusterfs/vol0 gluster volume add-brick volumedisk1 stor3data:/mnt/disk_c/glusterfs/vol1 gluster volume add-brick volumedisk1 stor3data:/mnt/disk_d/glusterfs/vol1 gluster volume rebalance volumedisk0 start force gluster volume rebalance volumedisk1 start force For some reason , could be unbalanced the assigned range of DHT for stor3data bricks ? Could be minor than stor1data and st...

...ol_pitch_coef=0; } /*Compute "real" excitation*/ fir_mem2(st->frame, st->interp_lpc, st->exc, st->frameSize, st->lpcSize, st->mem_exc); /* Compute open-loop excitation gain */ #ifdef EPIC_48K if (st->lbr_48k) { float ol1=0,ol2=0; float ol_gain2; ol1 = compute_rms(st->exc, st->frameSize>>1); ol2 = compute_rms(st->exc+(st->frameSize>>1), st->frameSize>>1); ol1 *= ol1*(st->frameSize>>1); ol2 *= ol2*(st->frameSize>>1);...

...his bug and now df shows the right size: > > That is good to hear. > [root at stor1 ~]# df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 > /dev/sdc1 50T 16T 34T 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 > stor1data:/volumedisk0 > 101T 3,3T 97T 4% /volumedisk0 > stor1data:/volumedisk1 > 197T 61T 136T 31% /volumedisk1 > > > [root at stor2 ~]# df -h > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/sdb1...

Hi Nithya, I applied the workarround for this bug and now df shows the right size: [root at stor1 ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterfs/vol0 /dev/sdc1 50T 16T 34T 33% /mnt/glusterfs/vol1 stor1data:/volumedisk0 101T 3,3T 97T 4% /volumedisk0 stor1data:/volumedisk1 197T 61T 136T 31% /volumedisk1 [root at stor2 ~]# df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sdb1 26T 1,1T 25T 4% /mnt/glusterf...

...7065 7273 6f6e xAccount..person 0x0310: 0414 6f72 6761 6e69 7a61 7469 6f6e 616c ..organizational 0x0320: 5065 7273 6f6e 0404 7573 6572 301b 0412 Person..user0... 0x0330: 7573 6572 4163 636f 756e 7443 6f6e 7472 userAccountContr 0x0340: 6f6c 3105 0403 3531 3230 2204 0a70 7764 ol1...5120"..pwd 0x0350: 4c61 7374 5365 7431 1404 1231 3331 3234 LastSet1...13124 0x0360: 3139 3936 3137 3030 3030 3030 3030 1304 19961700000000.. 0x0370: 0975 6964 4e75 6d62 6572 3106 0404 3230 .uidNumber1...20 0x0380: 3032 3039 0408 6d65 6d62 6572 4f66 312d 0209..memberOf...

Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking