search for: oggpcm3

Hi all, The remaining issue to be decided for the OggPCM2 spec is the support of chunked vs interleaved data. Just so that everyone understands what we are talking about, consider a stereo file that gets stored as an OggPCM file. Within an OggPCM packet, the audio samples for the left and right channels can be stored as interleaved where the samples would be: l0, r0, l1, r1, ..... lN, rN

...PCM2 reflecting the latest discussions. Could everyone have a look at it and see if they agree. Otherwise, what do you feel should be changed? Anyone wants to speak in support of chunked PCM? For all those that are just tired of this mess like me, please express yourself in the new spec I created: OggPCM3 http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/OggPCM3 Jean-Marc P.S. So far, I think we have OggPCM2 5, OggPCM 0. Please vote for OggPCM3! :-) Le mardi 15 novembre 2005 ? 11:21 +0100, Michael Smith a ?crit : > On 11/15/05, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+xiph@mega-nerd.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > &gt...

On 10/19/07, Sampo Syreeni <decoy@iki.fi> wrote: > On 2007-10-19, Martin Leese wrote: > > OggPCM Draft3 > > Draft 3 is obviously a joke. Draft 2 is what most of the people agreed > upon the last time around, with the channel maps left unfinished. Draft > 1 was abandoned by most people in favour of draft 2. So what is "OggPCM"? I started this thread

...> changing a draft instead of the document > > itself. > > The original OggPCM was started by a person who really didn't > lnow what they were doing and wouldn't listen to or accept > input from anyone else. OggPCM2 was started to put and end to > the wiki edit war. OggPCM3 was purely a joke. >From the History of the "OggPCM" page, Draft2 was copied over to "OggPCM" in March 2006 and in October 2006 the "this is a draft" phrasing was removed. From that point, "OggPCM Draft2" was redundant and should have been deleted. &quo...